RESUMO
Introduction: urticaria has a high impact on the quality of life of patients with this condition. While there are multiple evidence-based guidelines, these tend to be aimed at providing management recommendations for specialists rather than primary care physicians, who are usually the first to care for patients with urticaria. Objective: to develop a consensus document aimed at presenting evidence-based recommendations to help general practitioners, family doctors, pediatricians, internists and emergency physicians provide timely care for patients with urticaria, facilitating its diagnosis and timely care, and thus avoiding delays for the patients. Methods: international urticaria guidelines with recommendations based on the GRADE system were used as the source of information. Delegates of the interested scientific societies were convened, and, through structured meetings, treatment barriers and possible solutions for the application of the recommendations in primary care were identified. Results: the main barriers for primary care physicians in applying the guidelines were identified: confusion in the diagnosis, proper timing of treatment, first-line medications, and management of special situations. Possible consensus solutions were proposed for each identified barrier. Conclusion: this consensus document contains recommendations for the management and treatment of acute and chronic urticaria which help primary care physicians provide timely and effective treatment for patients with this disease. (Acta Med Colomb 2022; 48. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36104/amc.2023.2722).
RESUMO
Propósito de la revisión: revisar la literatura actual sobre el síndrome hipereosinofílico y establecercuáles son las diferencias y semejanzas con el síndrome de Churg-Strauss. Fuente de datos: revisión estructurada de la literatura médica, en las bases de datos Pubmed, Medline y Cochrane. Selección de estudios: se limitó la búsqueda a los artículos de revisión, guías de manejo y meta-análisis, sin límites en idioma ni fecha de publicación, utilizando los términos MESH: hypereosinophilic síndrome, eosinophilic, Churg-Strauss sindrome. Se acoplaron a términos como: update, review, associations. Extracción de datos: se hizo la lectura del resumen de 232 trabajos de los cuales se seleccionaron 111 que eran representativos para el tema de esta revisión, después de una clasificación y ordenamiento, se procedió a la redacción del texto. Conclusiones: el síndrome hipereosinofílico comprende un grupo heterogéneo de enfermedades con presentaciones clínicas muy variadas, para algunos autores el síndrome de Churg-Strauss o más recientemente conocido como granulomatosis eosinofílica con poliangiítis hace parte de este gran síndrome pero para otros, deben considerarse como entidades aparte. (Acta Med Colomb 2014; 39: 174-184).
Purpose of review: to review the current literature on the hypereosinophilic syndrome and establish which are the differences and similarities with Churg-Strauss syndrome. Source of data: structured review of the medical literature in databases Pubmed, Medline and Cochrane. Study selection: the search was limited to review articles, management guidelines and meta-analysis with no limits on language or publication date, using the MESH terms: hypereosinophilic syndrome, eosinophilic, Churg-Strauss syndrome. These were coupled to terms like:update, review, association. Data extraction: reading of the summary of 232 studies was made. Of these, 111 that were representative for the subject of this review, were selected, and after an ordered classification system, the wording was performed. Conclusions: The hypereosinophilic syndrome comprises a heterogeneous group of diseases with varied clinical presentations; for some authors, Churg-Strauss, more recently known as eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, is part of this great syndrome, but for others these should be considered as separate entities. (Acta Med Colomb 2014; 39: 174-184).