An open randomized clinical trial of Artekin vs artesunate-mefloquine in the treatment of acute uncomplicated falciparum malaria.

Malaria remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in tropical countries and subtropical regions in the world. Southeast Asia has the most resistant malaria parasites in the world, which has limited treatment options in this region. In response to this situation, short-course artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) have been developed. The combination of dihydroartemisinin (DHA) and piperaquine (PQP) in the form of Artekin has been developed as an alternative to established combinations, such as artesunate-mefloquine, primarily to reduce treatment costs and toxicity. We conducted a study comparing a standard treatment for acute uncomplicated falciparum malaria (artesunate 4 mg/kg/day together with mefloquine 8 mg/kg/day oral route once a day for 3 days) (Group A) and a combination of dihydroartemisinin 40 mg and piperaquine 320 mg in the form of Artekin given once a day for 3 days (Group B) to determine safety, efficacy, and tolerability. One hundred and eighty patients were randomly enrolled at the ratio of 1:2 into groups A:B. All patients had rapid initial clinical and parasitological responses. There were no significant differences in fever clearance time or parasite clearance time between both groups. The 28-day cure rates were high, at 100% and 99%, in groups A and B, respectively. We conclude that Artekin was as effective and well-tolerated as artesunate-mefloquine, and can be used alternatively as the current treatment for multidrug-resistant P. falciparum malaria.

An open, randomized trial of three-day treatment with artesunate combined with a standard dose of mefloquine divided over either two or three days, for acute, uncomplicated falciparum malaria.

The combination of artesunate and mefloquine is currently one of the most effective treatments for multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Simultaneous, rather than sequential treatment with the two drugs, would allow better patient compliance. We therefore evaluated three-day treatment with artesunate combined with either 2 or 3 days of mefloquine co-administered once a day with artesunate. The study was an open, randomized trial for acute, uncomplicated falciparum malaria and was conducted at the Bangkok Hospital for Tropical Diseases. One hundred and twenty adult patients were randomized to two treatment groups. Group 1 patients received 4 mg/kg/day of artesunate for 3 days and 3 daily doses of 8.0 mg/kg/day mefloquine given with artesunate. Group 2 patients received the same dose of artesunate and the same total dose of mefloquine (25 mg/kg). However, the mefloquine was given as 15 mg/kg on the first day and 10 mg/kg/ on the second day, again with artesunate. The baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients in the two groups were similar. The cure rates for the 3-day and 2-day mefloquine regimens were 100% and 99%, respectively. There were no significant differences in either median fever clearance times (group 1=32 hours; group 2=33 hours) or mean parasite clearance times (group 1=42.3 hours; group 2=43.3 hours). Both regimens were well tolerated and there were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse effects. Nausea or vomiting occurred in 3.8% of patients in both groups and transient dizziness occurred in 4% of group 1 and 9% of group 2 patients. These results suggest that a 3-day regimen of mefloquine administered with artesunate is effective and well tolerated. This practical regimen could improve patient compliance.

The pharmacokinetics of oral dihydroartemisinin and artesunate in healthy Thai volunteers.

The pharmacokinetics of oral dihydroartemisinin (DHA) following the dose of 2 and 4 mg/ kg body weight dihydroartemisinin (Twisinin, T-2 Program, Thailand) and 4 mg/kg body weight oral artesunate (AS; Guilin Pharmaceutical Works, Guangxi, China) were investigated in 20 healthy Thai volunteers (10 males, 10 females). All formulations were generally well tolerated. Oral DHA was rapidly absorbed from gastrointestinal tract with marked inter-individual variation. The pharmacokinetics of DHA following the two dose levels were similar and linearity in its kinetics was observed. Based on the model-independent pharmacokinetic analysis, median (95% CI) values for Cmax of 181 (120-306) and 360 (181-658) ng/ml were achieved at 1.5 hours following 2 and 4 mg/kg body weight dose, respectively. The corresponding values for AUC0-infinity, t1/2z, CL/f and Vz/f were 377 (199-1,128) vs 907 (324-2,289) ng.h/ml, 0.96 (0.70-1.81) vs 1.2 (0.75-1.44) hours, 7.7 (4.3-12.3) vs 6.6 (3.1-10.1) l/kg, and 90.5 (28.6-178.2) vs 6.6 (3.1-10.1) ml/min/kg, respectively (2 vs 4 mg/kg dose). Oral AS was rapidly biotransformed to DHA, which was detectable in plasma as early as 15 minutes of AS dosing. Following 4 mg/kg dose, median (95% CI) value for Cmax of 519 (236-284) ng/ml was achieved at 0.7 (0.25-1.5) hours. AUC0-infinity, and t1/2z were 657 (362-2,079) ng.h/ml, 0.74 (0.34-1.42) hours, respectively. Cmax of DHA following oral AS were significantly higher, but total systemic exposure was greater following oral DHA at the same dose level (4 mg/kg body weight). There was no significant sex difference in pharmacokinetics of DHA.