RESUMO
OBJECTIVE@#To investigate the clinical effect of One-stage posterior debridement combined with lumbar-ilium fixation and bone graft fusion for the treatment of lumbosacral tuberculosis.@*METHODS@#The clinical data of 31 patients with lumbosacral tuberculosis treated by one-stage posterior debridement combined with lumbar-ilium fixation and bone graft fusion from January 2013 to February 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 18 males and 13 females, aged from 18 to 77 years old with an average of (45.9±9.1) years. The lesion segment was form L to S. The preoperative ASIA grading showed that 2 cases were grade B, 17 cases were grade C, 12 were grade D. Pre- and post-operative C reactive protein (CRP), visual analogue scale (VAS), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), ASIA grade, lumbosacral angle and intervertebral space height were analyzed, the surgery complications, stability of internal fixation, bone fusion were observed.@*RESULTS@#All the 31 patients were followed up for 10 to 24 months with an average of (16.0±3.1) months. One patient with local infection and subcutaneous hydrops was cured by dressing change. Other 30 cases got primary healing without sinus formation and no recurrence of spinal tuberculosis. All the patients were cured, no internal fixation loosening and breakage were found. All bone fusion was successful with an average fusion time of (4.7±1.1) months. At the final follow-up, ESR and CRP were normal, the VAS was decreased from (6.13±1.21) points preoperatively to (1.92±0.57) pioints, the ASIA grading showed that 2 cases were grade C, 6 cases were grade D, and 23 cases were grade E. The lumbosacral angle and intervertebral space height was increased from preoperative (21.42±3.75) °, (7.84±0.41) mm to (27.21±3.12) °, (9.80±0.38) mm at the final follow-up, respectively.@*CONCLUSION@#One-stage posterior debridement combined with lumbar-ilium fixation and bone graft fusion is a practicable, effective and safe method for the treatment of lumbosacral tuberculosis. It can be recommended in clinical application.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE@#To compare clinical effect of movable external fixation and fusion fixation for the treatment of elbow tuberculosis.@*METHODS@#From October 2013 to June 2019, 52 patients with elbow tuberculosis treated with standard antituberculosis therapy were divided into movable external fixation group and fusion fixation group according to treatment methods. In group A, there were 25 patients, including 11 males and 14 females, aged from 24 to 75 years old with an average of (42.81± 9.01) years old; the courses of diseases ranged from 2 to 9 months with an average of (3.96±1.45) months. In group B, there were 27 patients, including 15 males and 12 females, aged from 23 to 77 years old with an averageof (44.08±7.44) years old; the courses of diseases ranged from 2 to 7 months with an average of (3.88±1.67) months. All patients were performed focus debridement. Intraoperative blood loss, operative time were compared between two groups. VAS score before operation, 2 weeks and 12 months after operation were applied to evaluate pain relieve;Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) before operation, 1 and 12 months after operation were used to evaluate clinical effect;changes of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and Creactive protein, CRP) before operation, 3 weeks after antituberculosis therapy, 1 week and 6 months after operation were compared between two groups.@*RESULTS@#All patients were followed up from 12 to 20 months with an average of (13.50±4.85) months. No mixed infection and recurrence of tuberculosis occurred. There were no statistical differences in intraoperative blood loss and operative time(@*CONCLUSION@#For elbow tuberculosis, movable external fixation and fusion fixation have equal effect in operative time, amount of bleeding and control of tuberculosis infection indicator. Movable external fixation need earlier functional exercise, not conducive to pain relief at early stage, which may be better than fusion fixation, it is worth clinical promoting.