Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery ; (12): 258-262, 2023.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-993319

RESUMO

Objective:To compare the safety and efficacy of the " step-up approach" versus the " step-jump approach" in treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN).Method:The clinical data of IPN patients who underwent step-up strategy or step-jump strategy treatment at the Department of Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from December 2018 to November 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) was done based on the nearest neighbor matching method (1: 1 ratio). After matching the baseline data (the caliper value was 0.01), a total of 62 patients with IPN were included, including 41 males and 21 females, aged (41.1±13.1) years old. Patients who were treated with the step-up strategy were included in the step-up group, while patients who were treated with the step-jump strategy were included in the step-jump group. There were 31 patients in each group after PSM, and the treatment effect of the two groups were compared.Results:Of the 62 patients with IPN, 43 received surgical intervention, and 19 were managed successfully using symptomatic anti-inflammatory treatment or percutaneous catheter drainage. The total hospitalization cost of patients in the step-jump group was significantly higher than that in the step-up group [122 000 (73 000, 179 000) yuan vs. 88 000 (46 000, 144 000) yuan, P=0.034]. The overall cure rate of IPN patients in the step-jump group was 93.5%(29/31). The 2 patients who died had type Ⅲ IPN. In the IPN patients in the step-up group were all cured, and the overall cure rate was 100%(31/31), with no death. There were no statistical differences between the two groups in the rates of death, postoperative complications, residual infection, debridement ≥2 times, and positive bacterial culture in blood or drainage fluid (all P>0.05). A total of 19.4% (12/62) patients had postoperative complications, including 4 patients with abdominal bleeding, 3 patients with new organ dysfunction, 2 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding, 2 patients with gastrointestinal fistula, and 1 patient with venous thrombosis in both lower limbs. Conclusion:Both the step-up treatment strategy and the step-jump treatment strategy were safe and effective for treatment of IPN patients.

2.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery ; (12): 593-598, 2023.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-990677

RESUMO

The step-up approach is the most important modality in the treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) and has been recommended by several national and international guidelines. Screening patients with low success rates of percutaneous drainage for timely treatment using the step-up approach and selecting appropriate escalation approach based on IPN staging are expected to improve the overall cure rate of IPN. The open debridement in the step-up approach should be carried out under reasonable indications and timing. When the patient's overall condition is poor and the condition of disease is complex, it is not necessary to adhere to a fixed treatment mode and choose a leapfrogging treatment strategy in a timely manner after thorough evaluation.When following the step-up approach in the treatment of IPN, endoscopic and surgical interventions are advocated in parallel, and escalating and leapfrogging strategies are promoted to establish an integrated, disease-centric, multidisciplinary treatment platform, with the aim of improving clinical prognosis. The authors review relevant literature and combine with team's treatment experience to explore the escalating strategies of surgical intervention for IPN, with a view to further improving the overall cure rate of IPN patients.

3.
Chinese Journal of Endocrine Surgery ; (6): 257-260, 2023.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-989937

RESUMO

In recent years, the risk of perioperative concurrent venous thromboembolism (venous thromboembolism, VTE) has been significantly increased in patients with pancreatic cancer. Early prediction of VTE and strengthening the quality evaluation and clinical management of pancreatic surgery are the key to promote the prevention and treatment of VTE in pancreatic cancer patients. In view of the particularity of pancreatic surgery and the risk of related complications, clinicians should not only focus on the prevention of VTE, but also take into account the occurrence of serious complications such as postoperative bleeding, and strive to balance the two. Based on the relevant guidelines and the clinical experience of the center, the author's team elaborated on the early prediction of VTE in patients with pancreatic cancer, the indication and timing of perioperative VTE prevention and treatment in pancreatic surgery, in order to provide beneficial reference for the clinicians of VTE prevention and treatment in such patients.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA