Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
International Journal of Surgery ; (12): 655-659,F3, 2021.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-907499

RESUMO

Objective:To introduce the usefulness and advantages of needle-type choledochotomy in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.Methods:A retrospective analysis for the data of 1 107 patients who successfully implemented laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in Subei People′s Hospital of Jiangsu Province from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2020 were applied. All cases were divided into the study group 662 cases with needle-type choledochotomy) and the control group (445 cases with non-needle-type choledochotomy) according to the manipulation of common bile duct incision. The time-cost, incidences of bleeding and bile leakage, as well as the recurrence rate of bile duct stone and the incidence of bile duct stenosis were observed and compared between the two groups. Normally distributed data were expressed as mean±standard deviation ( Mean± SD) and compared by t test while count data were expressed as frequency or percentage and compared by chi-square test or Fisher′s exact test. Results:The bile duct incision time and bleeding rate were (14.45±2.46) s and 25.1% in the study group, (104.48±15.32) s and 68.1% in the control group, respectively. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant ( P<0.001). The incidence of stone recurrence, biliary leakage, and bile duct stricture were 3.0%, 3.6% and 0.3% in the study group, 4.9%, 5.6% and 0.4% in the control group, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion:Needle-type bile duct incision can be used as a routine manipulation in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for its time-saving, less bleeding, safe and easy to handling.

2.
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery ; (12): 632-635, 2020.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-868877

RESUMO

The proportion of boardline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) is relatively high in patients with pancreatic cancer. At present, the main therapeutic treatment of BRPC is surgical resection after neoadjuvant therapy. Therefore, the neoadjuvant therapy of BRPC has drawn more and more attention in recent years. Once making a breakthroug in the treatment plan, it can greatly improve the overall prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer. In this study, the development process, specific programs, advantages and disadvantages of each plan and the current research progress of BRPC neoadjuvant therapy are discussed.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA