RESUMO
Background: In country like India, therapy with rosuvastatin recommended dose may cost between Rs. 400.00 and Rs. 800.00/month. The lower and middle income groups of Indian society are rapidly becoming major sufferers of cardiovascular disease, among all non-communicable diseases, the economic burden of rosuvastatin therapy may be substantial for this large section of population. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was to study the cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin on alternate day versus daily dosing regimen in hyperlipidemia patients. Materials and Methods: The research was carried out at MNR Medical College and Hospital’s department of pharmacology in association with general medicine. According to the inclusion criteria, 50 patients aged 30–60 years of both sexes were included in this prospective open label trial. The research lasted 6 weeks. All the participants were included in study after obtaining the informed consent and approval of the Institutional Ethics Committee was obtained before enrolment of participants. All patient data were obtained using a pre-designed proforma and put into an excel spreadsheet. Results: A total of 42 patients are included with 16 females (38%) and 26 men (62%). Cost of daily rosuvastatin for 6 weeks is Rs. 1087.80 (yearly daily dosing expenses 9453.50%) accounting for mean reduction of LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) of 33.50% and for alternate day rosuvastatin for 6 weeks is 543.90% (yearly alternate day dosing expense 4713.80%) accounting for mean reduction of LDL-C of 31%. Conclusion: Treatment with alternate day dose of rosuvastatin is comparably cost-effective when compared to currently practicing daily dose rosuvastatin therapy.
RESUMO
Background: The common cause of mortality in India is related to complications of cardiovascular disease which has direct relation with the hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. Rosuvastatin more efficacious than other statins in lesser dosage and having good safety profile. Aim and Objective: The present study was undertaken to evaluate the safety, efficacy of rosuvastatin 10 mg daily dose versus alternate day dose in hyperlipidemia patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 50 individuals with hyperlipidemia were selected in this prospective open label research. Patients were grouped as Group D with rosuvastatin daily dose and Group A with alternate day dose. Fasting plasma lipid profile was assessed in both groups on the 1st, 4th, and 6th weeks. Results: There is significant reduction in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides (TG), and elevation of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) after 4 weeks and 6 weeks of the treatment in both the groups compared to baseline. The mean percentage reduction of total cholesterol was by 24% and 21.60% (P < 0.05) in Group D and Group A, respectively. The mean percentage reduction of LDL-C was by 33.50% and 31% (P < 0.05) Group D and Group A, respectively. The mean percentage improvement of HDL-cholesterol was by 19.89% and 17.09% (P < 0.05) in Group D and Group A, respectively. The mean percentage of reduction of TG was by 36.70% and 41.33% (P < 0.05) Group D and Group A. Conclusion: Rosuvastatin 10 mg on alternate days had the same efficacy in lowering cholesterol levels as taking it every day, also it may be a cost-effective alternative without sacrificing therapeutic benefits or side effects.