RESUMO
A avaliação da qualidade de vida (QV) vem se tornando cada vez mais utilizada para medir o impacto geral de doenças na vida dos indivíduos. O diabetes melito (DM) é uma doença crônica associada com morbimortalidade elevada e prejuízo na QV. Em estudos longitudinais, o impacto psicossocial da DM prediz a mortalidade nessa doença. Esta revisão busca descrever e analisar os principais instrumentos de avaliação da QV em pacientes com DM. Foram analisados instrumentos genéricos, como Quality of Well-Being Scale (QWB), The Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) e EuroQol (EQ-5D), e instrumentos específicos, como Diabetes Care Profile (DCP), Diabetes Quality of Life Measure (DQOL), Diabetes Impact Measurement Scales (DIMS), Appraisal of Diabetes Scale (ADS), Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality of Life (ADDQoL), Diabetes Health Profile (DHP-1 e DHP-18), Questionnaire on Stress in Patients with Diabetes-Revised (QSD-R), Well-Being Enquiry for Diabetics (WED), Diabetes-Specific Quality-of-life Scale (DSQOLS), Diabetes 39 (D-39) e Problems Areas in Diabetes (PAID). O PAID é o único instrumento traduzido e validado para uso no Brasil. Tanto os instrumentos genéricos quanto os específicos têm vantagens e desvantagens na aferição da QV de pacientes com DM. O uso combinado de instrumentos genéricos (como o SF-36) e específicos (como o PAID) parece ser uma forma consistente de avaliação da QV em pacientes diabéticos no Brasil. O presente artigo revisa os vários instrumentos e enfatiza a necessidade urgente de estudos para validação desses instrumentos em pacientes diabéticos brasileiros.
The assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) has been increasingly used to measure the overall impact of diseases in people's life. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic disease associated with high morbidity, mortality, and HRQoL impairment in patients. In longitudinal studies, the psychosocial impact of DM predicts mortality. The objective of this review is to describe and to analyze the main instruments used for the HRQoL evaluation in patients with DM. Generic instruments such, as the Quality of Well-Being Scale (QWB), Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), EuroQol (EQ-5D) and specific instruments as the Diabetes Care Profile (DCP), Diabetes Quality of Life Measure (DQOL), Diabetes Impact Measurement Scales (DIMS), Appraisal of Diabetes Scale (ADS), Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality of Life (ADDQoL), Diabetes Health Profile (DHP-1 and DHP-18), Questionnaire on Stress in Patients with Diabetes-Revised (QSD-R), Well-Being Enquiry goes Diabetics (WED), Diabetes-Specific Quality-of-life Scale (DSQOLS), Diabetes 39 (D-39) Problems Areas in Diabetes (PAID) were analyzed. PAID is the only translated and validated instrument available in Brazil. The generic and specific instruments have their stregths and shortcomings for evaluation of HRQL in patients with DM. The combined use of both generic (such as the SF-36) and specific (such as the PAID) appears to be a consistent way to evaluate HRQoL as a construct in Brazilian patients with DM. The present article reviews a variety of instruments and emphasizes the urgent need for validation studies of such instruments to be used in Brazilian subjects with DM.