RESUMO
Background@#The increasing number of young survivors after cancer treatment and of patients with non-malignant conditions who are at risk for subfertility has resulted in a demand for fertility preservation services, including the Philippines.@*Objective@#The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the history, indications, and management principles of fertility preservation. Also, the available strategies in the Philippines in both pre-pubertal and post-pubertal men and women and future directions of the field in the country will be discussed.@* Materials and methods@#Literature review, historical accounts@*Results and conclusions@#Fertility preservation should be a priority when treating children and adults of reproductive age with agents that have deleterious effects on the gonads. If harmful treatment will be used, the options of fertility preservation should be discussed, as early as possible by the primary physician in collaboration with the oncologist and the reproductive medicine specialist. Most of the known options for fertility preservation are available in the Philippines and are being implemented in the local IVF centers. Recent developments hint of a potentially faster progress in the field with the establishment of the Philippine Society for Fertility Preservation in collaboration with other professional societies and a linkage with the Department of Health with the signing into law of the National Integrated Cancer Control Act of 2019.
Assuntos
Preservação da Fertilidade , Criopreservação , Oócitos , Ovário , FertilidadeRESUMO
Background@#Treatments for cancer have negative impact on fertility. Presently, there are technologies available to preserve the fertility of cancer patients even before gonadotoxic treatment is given. Several clinical practice guidelines on fertility preservation interventions for cancer patients have already been released. Among developed countries, Oncofertility is already an established field of clinical practice.@*Objectives@#This study aims to determine the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Filipino clinical practitioners on fertility preservation in cancer patients.@*Methodology@#This was a cross-sectional study carried out between June and September 2019 using a self- administered questionnaire. The questionnaires were sent to clinicians (medical oncologists, hematologists, surgical oncologists, and radiation oncologists) who were directly involved in the treatment patients with cancer.@*Results@#There were 213 respondents composed of 91 surgical oncologists (varied subspecialties), 81 medical oncologists, and 41 radiation oncologists. Most of the clinical practitioners, 58-85%, have not encountered patients who have availed of any fertility preservation method. In terms of knowledge, 53-73% of respondents were aware about some fertility preservation options, but had minimal knowledge. Ninety five percent of study participants acknowledged the need for more information on fertility preservation. Majority of clinicians (57%) have never referred to a fertility specialist; and only 38% have referred a patient for fertility preservation. The following factors were cited as barriers to discussion of fertility preservation: lack of knowledge of clinicians, poor success rates of fertility preservation, poor prognosis of patients, and prohibitive costs of treatment.@*Conclusion@#There is an acute need to increase knowledge and awareness about fertility preservation methods and international fertility preservation guidelines among Filipino health practitioners treating cancer patients.