Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Artigo em Inglês | IMSEAR | ID: sea-44440

RESUMO

This prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was performed to evaluate the antiemetic effectiveness and side effects of adding droperidol to morphine delivered via a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device in 94 women undergoing transabdominal hysterectomy with a standardized anesthetic regimen. They were randomly allocated to receive postoperative PCA as either bolus doses of morphine I mg or a combination of morphine 1 mg and 0.0625 mg droperidol with a lockout interval of 5 minutes and no continuous infusion. The incidence of nausea 6-18 hours postoperatively and 18-24 hours postoperatively was significantly lower in the morphine and droperidol group than in the morphine only group and its severity 2-6 hours, 6-18 hours, and 18-24 hours postoperatively was significantly lower. The number needed to treat to prevent nausea comparing the morphine only group at 6-18 and at 18-24 hours postoperatively were 4 and 4 (95% CI 2-27 and 2-11, respectively). The amount of morphine used 6-18 hours postoperatively in the droperidol group was lower than in the morphine only group. Although the incidence of vomiting and the amount of rescue antiemetics were lower in the morphine and droperidol group, the difference was not statistically significant. Postoperative pain scores were not different between the groups. No patients were oversedated. A series of extrapyramidal reactions were observed in one patient in the morphine and droperidol group. The drug and consumable item cost was not different between the groups. We conclude that droperidol added to morphine in PCA reduces nausea. The appropriate dose of droperidol should be further investigated to reduce the incidence of vomiting.


Assuntos
Adulto , Analgesia Controlada pelo Paciente/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Antieméticos/uso terapêutico , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Método Duplo-Cego , Droperidol/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morfina/efeitos adversos , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Artigo em Inglês | IMSEAR | ID: sea-45225

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence, causes, management and outcome of desaturation occurring in the perioperative peroids (induction, maintence, emergence and recovery room) at Siriraj Hospital from June 2001-December 2001. METHOD: Perioperative incident reports were collected and analyzed. Patients were catergorized as having desaturation if the SPO2 was below 90 per cent for more than 3 minutes. The incidence, causes, management, and outcomes of these patients were examined in detail. RESULTS: 62 out of 16,716 cases (0.37%) experienced desaturation. Elective patients (0.41%) experienced desaturation more frequently than emergency patients (0.14%). The causes were airway obstruction, hypoventilation, endotracheal tube problems, aspiration, atelectasis, and pulmonary edema. These patients were treated with higher FiO2, airway management, and ventilatory support which led to unplanned ICU admission. 4 patients developed cardiac arrest with successful resuscitation although 2 patients had cerebral infarction. CONCLUSION: Perioperative desaturation is an important sign of respiratory complications that should be recognized and treated immediately to prevent mortality and serious morbidity.


Assuntos
Adolescente , Adulto , Anestesia/efeitos adversos , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oxigênio/sangue , Assistência Perioperatória , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA