RESUMO
@#Abstract: Leprosy, as an important neglected tropical disease (NTDs), has a tremendous impact on the patients’body and psychology, families and society. In this paper, we reviewed the progress of epidemiology, genetic factors, immune mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment of leprosy, and introduced the changes of national prevention and control policies and the prevention and control process of Hainan Province, so as to improve the clinical understanding among healthcare professionals. According to the World Health Organization's (WHO) global annual leprosy situation report data, the number of new cases and the incidence rate of leprosy have been showing a downward trend worldwide. In China, the epidemic situation of leprosy remains in an overall low-endemic state. However, the long-standing low-endemic status of leprosy and its wide and uneven distribution pose challenges to the prevention and control of leprosy. The pathogenesis of leprosy is mainly related to skin barrier, immune deficiency, and related signaling pathways. Serological testing, cytokines, and microRNA markers can all be used to assist in the early diagnosis of leprosy, while also helping to distinguish different types of leprosy, predict leprosy reactions, evaluate efficacy, and monitor family contacts. The main treatment plan for leprosy involves combination chemotherapy with drugs recommended by the WHO, such as rifampicin, dapsone, clofazimine and other drugs. Currently, the main prevention and treatment strategies for leprosy are early detection, early diagnosis and early treatment, controlling the source of infection, protecting the healthy population, preventing the occurrence of deformity, and improving the quality of life after recovery. At present, Hainan Province as well as the whole country is in a low-epidemic state, but healthcare professionals still need to improve their awareness of prevention, reduce their incidence rate, and strive to achieve the goal of "zero leprosy" as soon as possible.
RESUMO
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the role of multidetector row spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of popliteal artery entrapment syndrome (PAES).</p><p><b>METHOD</b>Ten patients (13 limbs) were diagnosed as PAES through open surgery in Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2006 to December 2009, among whom three (30.0%) had both limbs involved.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Eleven limbs (84.6%) had occlusions in popliteal artery at admission. While only 15.4% of the patients were diagnosed as PAES by positional stress test, Doppler ultrasound, and arterial angiography, the disease was confirmed in all 10 patients by spiral computed tomography. As shown by inter-operative exploration, the PAES types included type 1 (n=2, 15.4%), 2(n=5, 38.5%),3 (n=4, 30.8%), and 5 (n=2, 15.4%). Two limbs underwent popliteal artery release only, 8 limbs underwent politeal artery release, thromboendarterectomy, and angioplasty with a venous or prosthetic patch, and 3 patients underwent catheter-based thrombolysis and popliteal artery release subsequently. During the follow-up (mean: 22 months; range: 4-33 months), the primary patency rate was 92.3% (12/13), the total patency rate was 100% (13/13), and the limb salvage rate was 100%.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Positional stress test, Doppler ultrasound, and arterial angiography play limited roles in the diagnosis of PAES with popliteal artery occlusion, while multidetector row spiral computed tomography is much helpful in diagnosing and typing PAES.</p>