Olecranon osteotomy vs. triceps-sparing for open reduction and internal fixation in treatment of distal humerus intercondylar fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

BACKGROUND@#The open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) was a standard treatment approach for fracture at distal humerus intercondylar, whereas the optimal way before ORIF remains inconclusive. We, therefore, performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of olecranon osteotomy vs. triceps-sparing approach for patients with distal humerus intercondylar fracture.@*METHODS@#The electronic searches were systematically performed in PubMed, EmBase, Cochrane library, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure from initial inception till December 2019. The primary endpoint was the incidence of excellent/good elbow function, and the secondary endpoints included Mayo elbow performance score, duration of operation, blood loss, and complications.@*RESULTS@#Nine studies involving a total of 637 patients were selected for meta-analysis. There were no significant differences between olecranon osteotomy and triceps-sparing approach for the incidence of excellent/good elbow function (odds ratio [OR]: 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-2.75; P = 0.371), Mayo elbow performance score (weight mean difference [WMD]: 0.17; 95% CI: -2.56 to 2.89; P = 0.904), duration of operation (WMD: 4.04; 95% CI: -28.60 to 36.69; P = 0.808), blood loss (WMD: 33.61; 95% CI: -18.35 to 85.58; P = 0.205), and complications (OR: 1.93; 95% CI: 0.49-7.60; P = 0.349). Sensitivity analyses found olecranon osteotomy might be associated with higher incidence of excellent/good elbow function, longer duration of operation, greater blood loss, and higher incidence of complications as compared with triceps-sparing approach.@*CONCLUSIONS@#This study found olecranon osteotomy did not yield additional benefit on the incidence of excellent/good elbow function, while the duration of operation, blood loss, and complications in patients treated with olecranon osteotomy might be inferior than triceps-sparing approach.

Progress on diagnosis and treatment of low transcondylar fractures of distal humerus / 中国骨伤

Low transcondylar fractures of the distal humerus in adults is rarely seen and reported in literatures. It has a bimodal distribution in terms of age, affecting the elderly and younger patients. The fracture is characterized by a very low transverse intra-capsular and extra-articular fracture lines extending from the level of lateral epicondyle to medial epicondyle. Standard elbow plain films and CT scans are crucial and indispensable for diagnosis. Conservative treatment is suitable for undisplaced fractures, patients who are intolerant of anesthesia, or people with advanced dementia. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is preferred. Parallel and orthogonal plate fixation are widely adopted while some researchers preferred crisscross-type screw fixation or bicolumnar 90-90 plating. In addition, some customized posterolateral plates are specially designed to be able to insert a transverse screw, functioning as lateral support. However, most of the recent researches conducted on low transcondylar fractures of the distal humerus are retrospective studies with relatively lower level of evidence compared to prospective and randomized controlled ones which remain a vacancy in this field. Therefore, further studies comparing the biomechanical properties and clinical prognosis of different configurations of internal fixation or total elbow arthroplasty for the treatment of low transcondylar fractures are needed in the future.