RESUMO
With the continuous progress of diagnosis and treatment technology on knee osteoarthrosis,the concept of"stepwise treatment" and "keeping meniscus as much as possible" has been deeply rooted in people's minds.As an important anatomical structure for maintaining the annular tension of the medial meniscus of the knee,more and more attention has been paid to the posterior root.After the root tear of the medial meniscus,the annular tension loss,leading to the meniscus bearing load function partial or complete loss,and secondary knee medial space narrow,cartilage degeneration and genu varus deformity.In the treatment of root tear of the medial meniscus different scholars hold different views.The treatment of the medial meniscus posterior root tear of the knee is mainly conservative treatment and operative treatment,and the conservative treatment mainly includes non-steroidal drugs,functional exercise,physical therapy,and so on.The surgical treatment mainly included the medial meniscus partial resection of the medial meniscus under the arthroscope,the medial meniscus posterior root repair under the arthroscopy,and osteotomy with medial meniscus posterior root repair under the arthroscopy.Despite the short-term curative effect of conservative therapy and resection is satisfied,long-term follow-up has no obvious improvement with knee pain,function and activity levels,and causes secondary biomechanical change of knee.For patients of age ＜65,genu varus ＜5°,Outerbridge cartilage classification ＜ grade Ⅲ and grade of Kellgren-Lawrence ＜ level Ⅲ,the curative effect of medial meniscus posterior root repair under the arthroscopy is satisfied,with good healing rate,and can delay the process of osteoarthritis in certain degree.For patients with joint deformities (medial proximal tibial angle ＜ 85°/lateral distal femur angle ＞90°) genu varus ＞5°,osteotomy can effectively improve the clinical curative effect.However,whether to repair the medial meniscus posterior root together is still controversial.
RESUMO
Objective To explore the correlation between old anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury with medial menis-cal tears and posterior slope of tibial plateau. Methods Between July 2014 and February 2016, retrospective analyzed 177 pa-tients diagnosed with old ACL injury (injured to surgery time>3 months) who has been underwent arthroscopic treatment. 93 pa-tients included in this study contained 65 male and 28 female,the average age was (32.36±4.50) years old (ranged from 21 to 44 years). All patients were diagnosed with ACL rupture and no associated medial meniscus tear by MR examination at the time of in-jury and before operation. Posterior slope angle of tibial plateau was measured via MR. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of medial meniscus tear by preoperative MR examination. Statistical analysis was employed to analyze the difference between the two groups of patients's age, body mass index (BMI), posterior slope angle of tibial plateau, gender and side. The patients were divided into group of posterior slope of tibial plateau ≥10° and posterior slope of tibial plateau<10° re-spectively. Statistical analysis was employed to analyze the incidence of concomitant medial meniscus tear between the two groups. Result All 93 patients in this study were followed up for the average of 8.63 ± 3.74 months. 51(51/93, 55%) patients were com-firmed of concomitant medial meniscus tear and 42 (42/93, 45%) patients without medial meniscus tear through MR and arthro-scope. There was no statistical difference between two groups in age (t=0.843, P=0.843), gender (χ2=1.027, P=0.338), BMI (t=0.568, P=0.571) and side (χ2=0.110, P=0.438). There was a certain correlation between the medial meniscal tears and posterior slope angle of tibial plateau in this group and the values were considered statistically significant ( r=0.602, P=0.000). Posterior slope angle of tibial plateau of medial meniscus tear group (10.51°±2.83°) was significantly higher than that in non medial menis-cus tear group (7.39°±4.62°). Values were considered statistically significant .71.15%(37/51) of the patients showed medial meniscus tear in the group of posterior slope of tibial plateau ≥10° , however, only 34.14%(14/42) patients indicated medial meniscus tear in group of posterior slope of tibial plateau<10°, and the difference was statistically significant(χ2=12.677,P=0.000). Con-clusion There is a certain correlation between old ACL injury with medial meniscal tears and posterior slope angle of tibial pla-teau. With the continuous increase of ACL injury time, high posterior slope angle of tibial plateau (≥10°) is more likely to increase the incidence of medial meniscus tear.
RESUMO
Objective To explore the correlation between old anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury with medial menis-cal tears and posterior slope of tibial plateau. Methods Between July 2014 and February 2016, retrospective analyzed 177 pa-tients diagnosed with old ACL injury (injured to surgery time>3 months) who has been underwent arthroscopic treatment. 93 pa-tients included in this study contained 65 male and 28 female,the average age was (32.36±4.50) years old (ranged from 21 to 44 years). All patients were diagnosed with ACL rupture and no associated medial meniscus tear by MR examination at the time of in-jury and before operation. Posterior slope angle of tibial plateau was measured via MR. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of medial meniscus tear by preoperative MR examination. Statistical analysis was employed to analyze the difference between the two groups of patients's age, body mass index (BMI), posterior slope angle of tibial plateau, gender and side. The patients were divided into group of posterior slope of tibial plateau ≥10° and posterior slope of tibial plateau<10° re-spectively. Statistical analysis was employed to analyze the incidence of concomitant medial meniscus tear between the two groups. Result All 93 patients in this study were followed up for the average of 8.63 ± 3.74 months. 51(51/93, 55%) patients were com-firmed of concomitant medial meniscus tear and 42 (42/93, 45%) patients without medial meniscus tear through MR and arthro-scope. There was no statistical difference between two groups in age (t=0.843, P=0.843), gender (χ2=1.027, P=0.338), BMI (t=0.568, P=0.571) and side (χ2=0.110, P=0.438). There was a certain correlation between the medial meniscal tears and posterior slope angle of tibial plateau in this group and the values were considered statistically significant ( r=0.602, P=0.000). Posterior slope angle of tibial plateau of medial meniscus tear group (10.51°±2.83°) was significantly higher than that in non medial menis-cus tear group (7.39°±4.62°). Values were considered statistically significant .71.15%(37/51) of the patients showed medial meniscus tear in the group of posterior slope of tibial plateau ≥10° , however, only 34.14%(14/42) patients indicated medial meniscus tear in group of posterior slope of tibial plateau<10°, and the difference was statistically significant(χ2=12.677,P=0.000). Con-clusion There is a certain correlation between old ACL injury with medial meniscal tears and posterior slope angle of tibial pla-teau. With the continuous increase of ACL injury time, high posterior slope angle of tibial plateau (≥10°) is more likely to increase the incidence of medial meniscus tear.
RESUMO
Objective To investigate the correlation of medial meniscus extrusion with meniscus injury location, type and genu varum. Methods From March 2014 to March 2015, a total of 97 patients with injury of medial meniscus undergoing ar?throscopy and surgery were selected as subjects, including 40 males and 57 females, aged 32-66 years, with a mean age of 51.2± 10.71 years. Based on the MRI of knee, there were 38 cases with medial meniscus extrusion≥3 mm (extrusion group) and 59 cases without medial meniscus extrusion (non?extrusion group). Genu varus was measured on X?ray (Femur?Tibia?Angle<182°). The me?dial meniscus tear type was observed under arthroscopy (longitudinal tear, horizontal tear, oblique tear, radial tear, complex tear), as well as the meniscus tear location (anterior tear, body tear, posterior tear, root tear). The age, gender, BMI and involved side were compared between two groups. Multifactor unconditioned Logistic regression analysis was employed to analyze risk factors of medial meniscus extrusion. Results Two groups of patient showed no statistically significant difference in age (t=-1.511, P=0.135), gender (χ2=0.208, P=0.648), BMI (t=0.249, P=0.650) and side (χ2=0.052, P=0.820). The incidence of meniscus extru?sion in patients with genu varum was 89% (25/28), and the incidence of meniscus extrusion in patients with meniscus root tear was 78% (18/23). Significant difference could be spotted in the analysis of meniscal root tear (χ2=19.329, P=0.000), complex tear (χ2=5.111, P=0.024), genu varus (χ2=41.481, P=0.000) between patients with medial meniscus extrusion or without medial meniscus extrusion. Meanwhile, meniscus anterior tear (χ2=0.044, P=1.000), body tear (χ2=0.261, P=0.661), posterior tear (χ2=3.722, P=0.086), longitudinal tear (χ2=0.054, P=0.816), horizontal tear (χ2=0.317, P=0.790), oblique tear (χ2=0.198, P=0.819), radial tear (χ2=1.188, P=0.385) no statistical significance. By multifactor analysis, OR values of genu varus and root tear were 101.976 (95%CI:15.973, 651.041, P=0.000) and 35.517 (95%CI:6.804, 185.399, P=0.000), respectively. Conclusion Menis?cal root tear and genu varum were risk factors of medial meniscus extrusion.