Neuropad test for sudomotor function to predict the risk of diabetic foot ulceration / 南方医科大学学报

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To assess the predictive value of Neuropad test on occurrence of diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) among type 2 diabetic patients.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>We divided 725 cases of type 2 diabetic patients into the high-risk and the non-high-risk groups of DFU based on the results of vibration perception thresholds(VPT) examination, which was widely used as a criteria for predicting DFU. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to compare the effectiveness of Neuropad with 10 g Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (10 g SWMF) testing in predicting the risk of DFU.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Among 725 patients of type 2 diabetes, 6.1% were at a high risk of DFU. Compared to non-high-risk group, patients in high-risk group had older age, longer diabetes duration, higher values of complete colour change time (CCC time) of Neuropad and higher abnormal rate of 10 g SWMF (P<0.01). CCC time of Neuropad was shown to be better in predicting the risk of DFU than 10 g SWMF, and the area under the ROC curve was about 0.8, and the best cut-off value was 22.25 min.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Neuropad is an effective means for predicting of the risk of DFU, and can be used to prevent diabetic foot ulceration.</p>

Value appraisal of the application of continuous glucose monitoring system in patients with advanced gestational diabetes mellitus / 中国实用护理杂志

Objective We aimed to describe the application value of continuous glucose monitoring system in patients with advanced gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods Pregant women in the medium and late pregant phases (24～35 weeks) underwent GDM screen test from January 2006 to April 2007. They first received 50 g glucose challenge test and 100g OGTT was performed 3 days later when the blood glucose was higher than or equal to 7.8mmol/L. According to the diagnostic criteria from American Diabetes Mellitus (ADA) 47 women were diagnosed to possess GDM and they were further divided into the test group (25 cases) and the control group (22 cases). The test group received 72 hours continuous glucose monitoring (CGMS). The control group adopted peripheral blood glucose monitoring using blood from the fingertip, 7 times per day. Results There were no records of consciousness hypoglycemic symptoms and hypoglycemia during monitoring. The CGMS data suggested that the record of the percent of high blood glucose was (17.5±3.1)%, percent of low blood glucose was (2.4±0.9)%, which were higher than those of the control group, which were (14.3±2.2)% and 0. Conclusions We recommend pregant women with GDM to undergo CGMS while using peripheral blood glucose monitoring with blood from the fingertip. It could systemicly evaluate the real control condition of blood glucose and ensure the safety of both mothers and babies.