Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Chinese Journal of Oncology ; (12): 38-42, 2013.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-284243

RESUMO

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To analyze the factors affecting pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A retrospective cohort study was carried out to analyze the clinical data of 141 breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The factors affecting pCR and the changes of tumor receptor status before and after treatment were analyzed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Among all the 141 patients, 21 patients (14.9%) achieved pCR. The rate of pCR achieved by regimens of anthracycline combined with taxane was higher (16.8%, 19/113) than that by anthracycline-containing regimens (7.1%, 1/14). The dose intensity of anthracycline had a significant correlation with pCR rate (P < 0.05). The pCR rate in the relative dose intensity of taxane ≥ 0.85 arm was higher than that of < 0.85 arm (P = 0.02). Eighty patients (56.7%) had completed more than 4 cycles of chemotherapy and the median time to achieve pCR was 6 (3 to 10) cycles. The pCR rate had a significant difference between patients < 6 and ≥ 6 cycles (7.1% vs. 22.5%,P = 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor size measured by palpation ≤ 5 cm and ≥ 6 chemotherapy cycles were significantly related with pCR rate (P < 0.05). In all the 21 pCR patients, the pre-treatment ER(-), PR(-), HER-2(-) statuses were in 14, 14 and 17 patients, respectively. The status of ER, PR, HER-2 of most patients (74.2%, 69.7% and 87.7%, respectively) was not changed after treatment. Among the patients with changes in receptor status, ER changed from negative to positive was in the majority (37.1%, 13/35 vs. 12.9%, 4/31, P < 0.05), and the percentage of changes in PR and HER-2 status had no significant differences.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>The regimens of anthracycline combined with taxane can achieve a higher pCR rate. The lymph node and receptor status before therapy have no significant correlation with pCR. Patients who have primary tumor size ≤ 5 cm, ≥ 6 chemotherapy cycles and enough dose intensity are easier to achieve pCR. The receptor status before and after therapy should be determined, and according to any positive results, physicians can chose HER-2 targeted therapy and/or endocrine therapy after surgery to benefit the patients.</p>


Assuntos
Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antraciclinas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Usos Terapêuticos , Neoplasias da Mama , Tratamento Farmacológico , Metabolismo , Patologia , Hidrocarbonetos Aromáticos com Pontes , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Metástase Linfática , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Métodos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Receptor ErbB-2 , Metabolismo , Receptores de Estrogênio , Metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona , Metabolismo , Indução de Remissão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxoides , Carga Tumoral
2.
Chinese Journal of Oncology ; (12): 764-769, 2012.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-307298

RESUMO

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the correlation of clinical effects and reasonable doses of docetaxel salvage therapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>We reviewed retrospectively the clinical records of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with docetaxel and statistically analyzed the correlation between clinical effects and reasonable doses of docetaxel.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The objective response rate and clinical benefit rate of docetaxol in patients with metastatic breast cancer were 27.0% and 35.0%, respectively, and the median progression free survival (PFS) was 5.0 (3.8 - 6.3) months. In the analysis at a single dose level, the clinical benefit rate and PFS of the ≥ 90.0 mg/m(2) docetaxel group were superior to that of the < 90.0 mg/m(2) group (P = 0.008, P = 0.045). Multi-dose level group stratified analysis showed that the docetaxel < 75.0 mg/m(2) group was better than the 75.0 - 84.9 mg/m(2) PFS group (P = 0.018), and the ≥ 95.0 mg/m(2) group was better than the 75.0 - 84.9 mg/m(2) group (P = 0.048). In patients who received >third line treatment or previously received paclitaxel adjuvant therapy, the PFS of the ≥ 94.9 mg/m(2) docetaxel group was 6.0 months, better than the 3.0 months of the 75.0 ∼ 84.9 mg/m(2) group (P = 0.031; P = 0.021).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>There is a clear correlation between clinical effects and reasonable doses of docetaxel salvage therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer.</p>


Assuntos
Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Antineoplásicos , Usos Terapêuticos , Neoplasias Ósseas , Tratamento Farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama , Tratamento Farmacológico , Patologia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Seguimentos , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Tratamento Farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Tratamento Farmacológico , Indução de Remissão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Terapia de Salvação , Taxoides , Usos Terapêuticos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA