Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Chinese Journal of Oncology ; (12): 783-786, 2011.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-320139

RESUMO

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors in patients with cancer of unknown primary site (CUP).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The clinical and follow-up data of 68 CUP patients (46 adenocarcinoma patients, 22 squamous cell carcinoma patients), were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analysis were conducted to determine the correlation of survival with clinical features, tumor markers, blood test, liver function and so on.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The median survival time of the 68 CUP patients was 123 days. The results from univariate Cox regression analysis showed that the prognostic factors were related to a performance status, presence or absence of liver metastases, the number of metastatic sites, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), hypoalbuminemia, hypohemoglobinemia and lymphocyte count. Multivariate Cox regression analysis of the clinical factors identified that a performance status (PS) ≥ 2, liver metastasis, elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, hypoalbuminemia (< 35 g/L) and lymphopenia (≤ 0.7 × 10(9)/L) were significant independent unfavorable predictive factors. Based on the number of the unfavorable predictive factors, we divided all the patients into three subgroups: subgroup involving 0-1 unfavorable factor, subgroup involving 2 - 3 unfavorable factors and subgroup involving 4 - 6 unfavorable factors. The median survival time was 390 days, 138 days and 77 days, respectively, in the 3 subgroups. Compared with the other two groups, the survival of the subgroup involving 0 - 1 unfavorable factor was significantly longer (P < 0.05), the survival between the subgroup involving 2 - 3 unfavorable factors and subgroup involving 4 - 6 unfavorable factors was not significantly different (P > 0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>A performance status ≥ 2, liver metastasis, elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen and lactate dehydrogenase levels, hypoalbuminemia and lymphopenia are independent unfavorable prognostic factors in patients with cancer of unknown primary site. The patients who had more than 2 unfavorable prognostic factors have a worse prognosis.</p>


Assuntos
Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Adenocarcinoma , Sangue , Patologia , Terapêutica , Antígeno Carcinoembrionário , Sangue , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Sangue , Patologia , Terapêutica , Seguimentos , L-Lactato Desidrogenase , Sangue , Contagem de Leucócitos , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Metástase Linfática , Neoplasias Primárias Desconhecidas , Sangue , Patologia , Terapêutica , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Albumina Sérica , Metabolismo , Análise de Sobrevida
2.
Chinese journal of integrative medicine ; (12): 175-179, 2006.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-314064

RESUMO

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To explore the effect and possible mechanism of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) on survival and quality of life (QOL) in patients with esophageal carcinoma after esophagectomy.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Adopting prospective controlled method of study, the authors had 128 post-esophagectomy patients, hospitalized from February 2001 to February 2002, randomly divided into 3 groups: the TCM group, treated with TCM drugs alone; the chemotherapy group, with chemotherapy alone applied; and the synthetic group, treated with chemotherapy combined with Chinese medicine. Their survival rate and QOL were compared.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>In the TCM group, the chemotherapy group and the synthetic group, the respective 3-year relapse and remote metastasis rate were 71.4%, 76.7%, 53.4%, respectively (chi(2) = 6.53, P < 0.05); the 1-year survival rate 42.9%, 46.5%, 72.1%; 2-year survival rate 28.6%, 27.9%, 55.8%, and 3-year survival rate 26.2%, 23.1%, 37.2%, respectively. And the QOL improving rate was 69.0%, 37.2%, 58.1%, respectively, all showing significant difference among them (chi(2) = 6.10, all P < 0.05). Moreover, immune function was increased in the TCM and the synthetic groups.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Integrative Chinese and Western medicinal treatment was the beneficial choice for post-operational patients with esophageal carcinoma. However, long time use of simple Chinese medicine was also advisable, especially for those in poverty.</p>


Assuntos
Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medicamentos de Ervas Chinesas , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Tratamento Farmacológico , Mortalidade , Cirurgia Geral , Esofagectomia , Seguimentos , Sistema Imunitário , Imunoglobulinas , Sangue , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Mortalidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Taxa de Sobrevida , Subpopulações de Linfócitos T
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA