RESUMO
Lymphoma is a group of complex malignant tumors of the lymphohematopoietic system, and its incidence rate is increasing year by year, but the etiology is still unknown. It is generally believed that it is the result of synergistic effect of genetic factors, physical and chemical factors (including radiation, air pollution, lifestyles, eating habits, etc.), biological factors (bacteria and virus infection) and so on. This article reviews the research progress on the relationship between some lifestyles and eating habits and the risk of lymphoma, in order to improve the attention and change of unhealthy lifestyles and eating habits.
RESUMO
Objective:To compare the clinical utility of 18F-fibroblast activating protein inhibitor (FAPI)-42 and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT imaging in newly diagnosed lung cancer patients. Methods:From May 2020 to September 2021, the images of 43 lung cancer patients (32 males, 11 females, age: 37-80 years) who pathologically confirmed and received 18F-FDG and 18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT within 2 weeks in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University were prospectively analyzed. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max) of 18F-FDG and 18F-FAPI-42 and the number of lesions detected by 2 imaging methods were compared by using paired t test and Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results:The 43 newly diagnosed lung cancer patients included 35 adenocarcinoma, 2 squamous cell carcinoma, 4 small cell lung cancer, and 2 high-grade neuroendocrine tumors. 18F-FAPI-42 had a very high tumor uptake (SUV max: 12.24±3.97) and lesion detection rate (positive rate: 100%(37/37)) in primary lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. The uptake of 18F-FAPI-42 in lymph node (10.13±5.43), pleura (6.75(4.96, 8.58)) and bone lesion (7.18(4.33, 9.66)) were significantly higher than those of 18F-FDG (6.35±3.30, 2.69(1.81, 5.00), 4.38(2.96, 6.36); t=12.19, z values: 5.47, 5.79, all P<0.001). In lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, although the uptake of 18F-FAPI-42 in brain metastases was significantly lower than that of 18F-FDG (0.72(0.15, 1.82) vs 6.53(4.65, 9.34); z=6.42, P<0.001), the tumor/background (T/B) ratio was significantly higher than that of 18F-FDG (3.54(1.15, 14.88) vs 0.96(0.77, 1.04); z=6.05, P<0.001). In lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, the number of lesions detected by 18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT was significantly more than that of 18F-FDG (lymph node: 6.0(2.3, 11.5) vs 4.5(2.0, 10.8); brain: 2.0(1.0, 3.0) vs 0.0(0.0, 0.0); pleura: 6.0(2.8, 10.0) vs 4.0(0.8, 5.5); z values: 2.16, 3.10, 2.04, all P<0.05). However, in high-grade neuroendocrine tumors and small cell lung cancer, the SUV max of 18F-FAPI-42 in primary lesions (8.05±2.60), lymph node lesions (5.98±2.21) and brain lesions (0.44(0.13, 0.82)) were lower than those of 18F-FDG (16.28±5.17, 12.30±5.47, 4.94(4.84, 6.25); t values: 3.58, 7.52, z=3.06, all P<0.05). Conclusions:In lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, 18F-FAPI-42 has a very high tumor uptake and lesion detection rate in primary tumor. In addition, compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT, 18F-FAPI-42 PET/CT shows clearer tumor contours and more lesions. Therefore, 18F-FAPI-42 is more suitable for preliminary staging of lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma than 18F-FDG, while the opposite is true in small cell lung cancer and high-grade neuroendocrine tumors.
RESUMO
Objective To analyze the relationship of clinicopathologic Features and prognosis of triple negative breast cancer. Methods A total of 196 cases with operable breast cancer received in our hospital between January 2002 and February 2007 were analyzed. We used immunohistochemistry to determine Her2, ER, and PR status. The patients were divided into the triple negative breast cancer group (ER negative,PR negative, and Her-2 negative)and the non-triple negative breast cancer group. The clinicopathologic features of the two groups were compared. The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) was analyzed. Results Of the 196 patients, 13.27% (26/196) had triple negative breast cancer. The percentage of cases with tumor exceeded 5 cm or grade Ⅲ was higher in the triple negative group than in the non-triple negative group (P ＜ 0.05 ). No significant difference was found in other clinicopathologic features between the two groups.The 3-year DFS was 84.62% (22/26) in the triple negative group and 92.94% ( 158/170)in the non-triple negative group. Conclusion Compared with non triple negative breast cancer, triple negative breast cancer has an increased possibility of local recurrence or distant metastasis,leading to a poorer prognosis.