Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Chinese Journal of Hypertension ; (12)2006.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-552177

RESUMO

Objective To study the target organ damage in patients of hypertension with metabolic disorder. Methods 1033 patients were divided into five groups: hypertension without complications(102 cases), hypertension with dyslipidemia (117 cases), hypertension with abdominal obesity(119 cases), hypertension with type 2 diabetes mellitus(135 cases), hypertension with metabolic syndrome (560 cases). The structure and the function of heart and blood vessel were examined by color Doppler. Urinary microalbuminuria was determined. Results (1)Only 9.9% patients of hypertension were without metabolic disorder, 90.1% hypertensives complicated with the metabolic disorder; (2)Compared with hypertension with dyslipidemia, hypertension with type 2 diabetes mellitus (P90%) complicated with the metabolic disturbance. Hypertension complicated with abdominal obesity accentuate left ventricular hypertrophy. Hypertension with diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome accentuated the vascular and renal lesion.

2.
Journal of Third Military Medical University ; (24)2003.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-564001

RESUMO

Objective To observe the effect of atorvastatin on intraabdominal fat and microalbuminuria (MAU) in patients with metabolic syndrome (MS). Methods Forty-four MS patients were divided into the atorvastatin group and the control group. Blood pressure and blood glucose were controlled in both groups, in addition, atorvastatin was administered to the patients in the atorvastatin group. Blood pressure, blood glucose, body weight, abdominal wall fat, intraabdominal fat and MAU were compared before and after 12 weeks’ treatment. Results Obvious decrease of the intraabdominal fat and MAU was found in the atorvastatin group compared with those before the treatment Intraabdominal fat: non-ACE1/ARB (41.76?3.61) mm vs (33.23?2.47) mm, P

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA