RESUMO
Objective:To study the relationship between pancreaticobiliary maljunction (PBM) with cholangiopancreatic diseases, and to evaluate the efficacy and safety using endoscopic therapy for PBM.Methods:The clinical data of 734 patients treated with ERCP at the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University from May 2016 to April 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Of 31 PBM patients who were finally included in this study, there were 23 patients with benign diseases and 8 patients with malignant diseases. Using the diameter of bile duct, these patients were divided into two groups: dilated bile duct group and the non-dilated bile duct group. The general characteristics of patients, incidences of cholangiopancreatic disease, endoscopic treatment, therapeutic efficacy and follow-up data were analyzed.Results:Of the 31 patients with PBM, 11 were males and 20 were females, aged (56.7±16.2) years. There were 4 patients with choledochal cyst (12.9%) and 6 patients with biliary cancer (19.4%). The incidences were significantly higher than those in non-PBM patients (0.9% and 5.3%, respectively, P<0.05). All 31 patients with PBM underwent endoscopic EST treatment, including 15 patients (48.4%) treated with endoscopic naso-biliary drainage (ENBD), 9 patients (29.0%) with endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD), 4 patients (12.9%) with endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation (EPBD)+ ENBD, 1 patient (3.2%) with endoscopic metal biliary endoprothesis (EMBE)+ ENBD, 1 patient with ERBD+ endoscopic retrograde pancreatic drainage (3.2%), and 1 patient with EPBD+ ERBD+ EMBE (3.2%). The operative success rate was 100%. Serum AST, ALT, ALP, GGT, TBil and DBil levels of patients in the benign group and malignant group were significantly decreased postoperatively when compared with the preoperative levels (all P<0.05). One patient (3.2%) developed post ERCP pancreatitis. The preoperative and postoperative NRS scores of the patients in the benign group were 7(6, 8) points compared to 0 (0, 1) points, respectively ( P<0.05). All the 23 patients in the benign group were followed up for (25.13±12.90) months. There were no patients who were loss to follow-up. There was no malignant transformation. Three PMB patients with dilated bile ducts still had attacks of abdominal pain or jaundice. The symptoms of the remaining 20 patients were completely relieved, giving a treatment efficacious rate of 87.0% (20/23). Conclusions:PBM was closely related to choledochal cysts, biliary cancer and other diseases. Endoscopic treatment was efficacious and safe, and provided a safe and feasible treatment in preventing future cholangiopancreatic attacks.
RESUMO
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) versus endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with large balloon dilation (ESBD) in the treatment of large common bile duct stones (≥10 mm). MethodsPubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and VIP were searched for related articles published up to March 2020. Two reviewers independently performed article screening, data extraction, and quality assessment, and RevMan 5.3 software was used for statistical analysis. ResultsA total of 11 studies (6 randomized controlled trials and 5 non-randomized controlled trials) were included, with 1282 patients in total. The meta-analysis showed that in the 6 randomized controlled trials, there were no significant differences between the EPLBD group and the ESBD group in initial stone clearance rate (odds ratio ［OR］=0.71, 95% confidence interval ［CI］: 0.45-1.12, P=0.14), overall stone clearance rate (OR=1.39, 95%CI: 0.65-2.96, P=0.39), rate of use of mechanical lithotripsy (OR=1.19, 95%CI: 0.75-1.89, P=0.46), and incidence rate of early complications (OR=1.10, 95%CI: 0.60-2.03, P=075); in the 5 non-randomized controlled trials, there were no significant differences between the EPLBD group and the ESBD group in initial stone clearance rate (OR=0.64, 95%CI: 0.35-1.15, P=0.13), overall stone clearance rate (OR=0.46, 95%CI: 0.19-112, P=009), and incidence rate of early complications (OR=1.20, 95%CI: 0.65-2.21, P=0.56), but the EPLBD group had a significantly higher rate of use of mechanical lithotripsy than the ESBD group (OR=1.96, 95%CI: 1.26-3.05, P=0.003). ConclusionEPLBD and ESBD have similar efficacy and safety in the treatment of large common bile duct stones, while EPLBD may increase the risk of the use of mechanical lithotripsy. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this conclusion.
RESUMO
Objective:To study the effectiveness and safety of perioperative lactated Ringer solution (LRS) in prevention and alleviation of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) under different fluid replacement regimens to arrive at the most precise quantitative fluid replacement regimen.Methods:Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library Database, Wanfang Database, CNKI, and VIP were searched from inception to February 2020. Randomized controlled trials on LRS in prevention and alleviation of PEP under different fluid replacement regimens were collected. The experiment group was actively rehydrated with LRS during the perioperative period, and the amount of rehydration was significantly higher than that of the control group. The control group was given standard dose of LRS or normal saline. Two researchers independently selected the articles based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and evaluated the risk of bias. RevMan 5.3 software was used for statistical analysis.Results:Ten studies with 2 261 patients were included, with 1 140 patients in the experiment group, and 1 121 patients in the control group. Meta-analysis showed that when the experiment group was given LRS at a rate of 5.0 ml·kg -1·h -1 during the perioperative period for about 9 hours and compared with the control group, the incidence of PEP in the experiment group was significantly reduced ( OR=0.32, 95% CI: 0.21-0.48, P<0.05). The incidence of moderate to severe PEP was also significantly reduced ( OR=0.28, 95% CI: 0.09-0.84, P<0.05). There was no increase in the incidence of adverse reactions related to fluid replacement. However, there were no significant differences in the incidence of PEP, and in moderate to severe PEP between the two groups when LRS was given at a rate of 4.0~4.5 ml·kg -1·h -1 within 9 hours, and less than 4.0 ml·kg -1·h -1 within 24 hours of total rehydration time (all P>0.05). Conclusion:During the perioperative period, the current evidence showed that it is most reasonable to give the fluid replacement regimen with aggressive hydration using LRS at a rate of 5.0 ml·kg -1·h -1 in about 9 hours to prevent and alleviate PEP. This is recommended for clinical practice and is worthy of further future studies.
RESUMO
Objective To discuss the significance of the application of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR)combined with prostate specific antigen (PSA)in early diagnosis of prostate carcinoma.Methods 120 cases with surgery treatment of prostate carcinoma were selected as study group,and 120 healthy people were selected as control groups.The NLR and PSA were tested to diagnose the prostate carcinoma.The critical value of NLR in diagnosing prostate carcinoma was evaluated by ROC curves,and the advantages of combination of NLR and PSA were judged. Results By using ROC curves to evaluate the NLR in diagnosis,the critical value was 2.75.The susceptibility, specificity,Youden index,correct index were 0.79,0.85,0.65,0.72.The susceptibility,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value,correct index of NLR combined with PSA in diagnosing the prostate carcinoma were 0.85,0.83,5.00,0.18,0.68.Conclusion The application of NLR has higher susceptibility and specificity to diagnose prostate carcinoma.NLR combined with PSA can improve the susceptibility and specificity of early diagnosis of prostate carcinoma.