Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae ; (6): 706-709, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-277917

RESUMO

Objective To evaluate the sensitivities of various biopsy methods for the diagnosis of systematic amyloidosis (SA). Methods The clinical data and biopsy results of 194 SA patients who were treated in Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2009 to June 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Results The highest sensitivity was achieved by biopsy of affected organs,with renal biopsy 97.4%,heart biopsy 95.0% and liver biopsy 87.5%. Among non-invasive biopsy methods,tongue biopsy was found to be 75% sensitive,followed by gingiva biopsy at 57%,abdominal fat pad aspiration at 57%,rectum biopsy at 16%,and bone marrow examination at 8%. Combination of tongue and abdominal fat pad biopsy yielded a detection rate of 93.1%. Conclusions Biopsy of the involved organ has the highest sensitivity. However,combination of multiple non-invasive biopsy methods may has sensitivity comparable to organ biopsy and is safer and more convenient.


Assuntos
Humanos , Tecido Adiposo , Patologia , Amiloidose , Diagnóstico , Biópsia , Métodos , Biópsia por Agulha , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Língua , Patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA