RESUMO
Objective To evaluate the role of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) in non-medullary andmedullary cells in lung ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury in mice.Methods Ten healthy male TLR4+/+ in non-medullary cells/TLR4+/+ in medullary cells (WT/WT) mice,10 TLR4-/-in non-medullary cells/ TLR4-/-in medullary cells (KO/KO) homozygote mice,10 TLR4+/+ in non-medullary cells/TLR4-/-in medullary cells (WT/KO) mice,and 10 TLR4-/-in non-medullary cells/TLR4+/+ in medullary cells (KO/WT) heterozygote mice,aged 6-8 weeks,weighing 20-25 g,were used in the study.Lung I/R was induced by occlusion of the left hilum for 60 min followed by 240 min of reperfusion in anesthetized mice.Blood samples were obtained from the femoral artery at 240 min of reperfusion for blood gas analysis,and the oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) was calculated.The animals were then sacrificed and lung tissues were immediately removed for determination of wet/dry weight ratio,myeloperoxidase activity and contents of tumor necrosis factor-alpha,interleukin-1beta (IL-1β) and IL-6 (by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) and for microscopic examination of the pathological changes of lungs which were scored.Results Compared with WT/WT mice,the oxygenation index was significantly increased in sequence,and lung injury scores,wet/dry weight ratio,myeloperoxidase activity and contents of tumor necrosis factor-alpha,IL-1β and IL-6 were decreased in sequence in WT/KO,KO/WT and KO/KO mice (P＜0.05).Conclusion TLR4 in non-medullary cells plays a rnore important role in lung I/R injury than that in medullary cells of mice.
RESUMO
Objective The aim of this study was to determine the effects of ulinastatin, a broad spectrum proteinase inhibitor, on fibrinolytic system and platelet function during open heart surgery performed with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) .Methods Twenty ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱpatients of both sexes undergoing cardiac surgery under CPB were randomly divided into two groups of ten patients: control group(C) and ulinastatin group (U). In group U patients received ulinastatin 12 000 U?2kg-1 . Half of the dose was given iv 10 min before CPB and the other half was added to the priming solution. In group C patients received normal saline instead of ulinastatin. Blood samples were taken before CPB (T1 ) , 30 min after CPB was started (T2), at the end of CPB (T3), 2 h and 4 h after CPB(T4 , T5) for determination of plasma levels of D-Dimer, ?-granule membrane protein-140 (GMP-140), thromboxane B2 (TXB2) and 6-Keto-prostaglandin F1? (6-Keto-PGF1?) .Results The demographic data, aortic cross-clamping time, CPB time and duration of operation were comparable between the two groups. The plasma levels of D-Dimer, GMP-140, TXB2 and TXB2/6-Keto-PGFl? were significantly increased at T2 , T3 and T4 as compared with the baseline (T1 ) in both groups, but the increase was significantly larger in group C than in group U(P
RESUMO
Objective To compare the effects of sedation induced with midazolam and propofol on blood pressure(BP), heart rate(HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) during operation on lower extremity preformed under continuous epidural anesthesia in patients with the type Ⅱ diabetes. Methods Forty patients with type Ⅱ diabetes scheduled for lower limb surgery were randomized to receive either midazolam (group M n - 20) for propofol (group P n = 20) for sedation during operation, all patients were classified as ASA physical status Ⅱ or Ⅲ . The patients were unpremeditated. Epidural catheter was inserted at L2-3 or L3-4 . The local anesthetic used was 2% lidocaine. MAP,HR,HRV and SpO2 were monitored during anesthesia and operation. After onset of epidural analgesia a loading dose of midazolam(0.03 mg?kg-1 ) or propofol (0.7 mg?kg-1 ) was given i.v. followed by intermittent i.v. boluses of 1 /4-1 /2 loading dose to maintain the depth of sedation at OAA/S score of 3 (respond to name outer if called repeatedly) . Changes in HRV before and during sedation were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results The demographic data including sex, age and body weight were comparable between the two groups. LF and TP decreased significantly during sedation as compared with baseline in both groups ( P