RESUMO
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of distal tibiofibular screw fixation combined with ligament repair for the treatment of ankle fracture accompanied with distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries.Methods:A retrospective cohort analysis was made on clinical data of 72 patients with ankle fracture accompanied with distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries admitted to 909th Hospital of Joint Service Support Force of PLA from September 2017 to September 2020, including 38 males and 34 females, aged 19-65 years [(42.5±12.2)years]. The fracture was type B in 30 patients, type C 1 in 29 and type C2 in 13 according to Danis-Weber classification. A total of 36 patients were treated by distal tibiofibular screw fixation combined with ligament repair (fixation+repair group) and 24 patients by distal tibiofibular screw fixation (fixation group). Operation time, intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay were recorded. Visual analogue scale (VAS), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle hindfoot score and ankle range of motion (ROM) were determined at 1, 3 months postoperatively and at the final follow-up. Complications were documented. Results:All patients were followed up for 12-22 months [(15.9±2.2)months]. There were no significant differences in operation time, intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay between the two groups (all P>0.05). VAS in fixation+repair group was (3.1±1.0)points and (2.1±0.6)points at 1, 3 months postoperatively, significantly lower than (3.9±0.8)points and (2.6±0.8)points in fixation group (all P<0.05), but the score showed no significant difference between the two groups at the final follow-up ( P>0.05). AOFAS score in fixation+repair group was (64.7±4.0)points, (73.2±3.4)points and (87.2±3.4)points at 1, 3 months postoperatively and at the final follow-up, significantly higher than (60.1±4.9)points, (70.2±1.9)points and (84.1±2.6)points in fixation group (all P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the ROM between the two groups at 1 month postoperatively ( P>0.05), but the ROM at 3 months postoperatively and at the final follow-up in fixation+repair group [(44.4±2.9)° and (52.3±2.5)°, respectively] was significantly higher than that in fixation group [(41.4±2.7)° and (50.1±2.7)°, respectively] (all P<0.05). There was 1 patient with internal fixation loosening in fixation+repair group, with the incidence of complications of 3% (1/36). While the incidence of complications was significantly lhigher in fixation group [17%(6/36)], including 2 patients with re-separation of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis, 2 with internal fixation loosening and 2 with internal fixation breakage ( P<0.05). Conclusion:Compared with distal tibiofibular screw fixation, distal tibiofibular screw fixation combined with ligament repair for the treatment of ankle fracture accompanied with distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries is effective to early relieve ankle pain, improve ankle function and ROM, and reduce occurrence of complications.
RESUMO
Objective:To compare our self-designed elastic syndesmosis hook plate (ESHP) and suture-button technique in treatment of injury to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted of the 53 patients who had been treated at Military Orthopaedic Center, 909 Hospital of Joint Service Support Force of PLA for ankle fractures complicated with syndesmosis injury by ESHP or suture-button technique from March 2013 to March 2017. Of them, 28 were treated by ESHP (ESHP group: 15 males and 13 females aged from 26 to 60 years) and 25 by suture-button technique (suture-button group: 14 males and 11 females aged from 24 to 59 years). The 2 groups were compared in terms of syndesmosis fixation time, postoperative incision bleeding, hospital stay, and ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion and ankle function by Baird-Jackson scoring at 3, 6, 12 months after surgery. Postoperative complications were observed.Results:The 2 groups were comparable because there was no statistically significant deference in general data between the 2 groups ( P>0.05). Surgery went on uneventfully in all the patients. The syndesmosis fixation time [(9.7±2.2) min] and postoperative incision bleeding [(49.3±10.4) mL] in the ESHP group were significantly less than in the suture-button group [(16.2±1.4) min and (62.4±6.3) mL] ( P<0.05); the maximum plantar flexion (29.9°±1.3°) and Baird-Jackson scores (87.2±2.9) at 3 months after surgery in the ESHP group were significantly greater than in the suture-button group (22.8°±1.3° and 78.7±4.1) ( P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in hospital stay, maximum plantar flexion at postoperative 6 or 12 months, maximum dorsiflexion at postoperative 3, 6 or 12 months, or Baird-Jackson scores at postoperative 6 or 12 months (all P>0.05). This cohort was followed up for 12 to 14 months (average, 12.5 months). All fractures united during follow-up and all the implants were removed around postoperative 12 months. Follow-up within 12 months observed internal fixation failure caused by metal fatigue in one case in the ESHP group, and internal fixation irritation in one case, internal fixation failure in 2 cases and internal fixation sinking and osteolysis in one case in the suture-button group. Conclusion:Compared with the suture-button technique, treatment of injury to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis with ESHP may lead to shorter fixation time, less postoperative bleeding and complications, and faster functional recovery of the ankle.