RESUMO
Objective:To investigate the accuracy and postoperative efficacy of fluoroscopy and CT in measuring the mounting parameters of Taylor Spatial Frame.Methods:Data of patients with peripheral knee deformities who were treated by Taylor Spatial Frame from June 2006 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different measurement methods of mounting parameters, they were divided into fluoroscopy group (mounting parameters were obtained by intraoperative fluoroscopy) and CT group (mounting parameters were obtained by postoperative CT). There were 33 patients (35 segments) in the fluoroscopy group, 23 males (23 segments) and 10 females (12 segments), with an average age of 36.4±11.6 years old. In CT group, there were 30 patients, 19 males and 11 females, with an average age of 36.9±13.8 years. There were 22 cases (24 segments) of high tibial osteotomy, 5 cases (5 segments) of distal femur osteotomy, and 6 cases (6 segments) of both distal femur and high tibial osteotomy. Operation time, external fixation time, the number of electronic prescription and deformity correction time, mechanical axis deviation (MAD), medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), range of motion (ROM) andhospital for special surgery (HSS) knee functional scores were compared between the two groups.Results:All the 63 patients were followed up for 21.9 months (range, 12-60 months). In fluoroscopy group, operating time was 100.9±9.1 min, electronic prescription number 1.4±0.6, and deformity correction time was 19.4±3.6 days. In CT group, operating time was 79.2±10.8 min, electronic prescription number 1.2±0.4, and deformity correction time was 16.0±4.4 days. The difference of the above indexes between the two groups was statistically significant ( t=8.803, 2.042, 3.440, all P < 0.05). In the fluoroscopy group, the external fixation time was 4.8±0.9 months; MAD was 4.3±2.1 mm; MPTA was 88.5°±1.9°; mLDFA was knee 89.2°; ROM was 122.4°±3.9° and HSS score was 90.0±3.6. In CT group, the external fixation time was 4.6±0.9 months; MAD was 4.0±1.9 mm; MPTA was 87.8°±1.7°; mLDFA was knee 88.6°; ROM was 122.7°±3.4° and HSS score was 91.1±2.9. There was no statistically significant difference in the above indexes between the two groups (all P >0.05). In the fluoroscopy group, 22 segmental deformities were corrected by one electronic prescription, and 13 segmental deformities were corrected by two or more electronic prescriptions. In CT group, 25 segmental deformities were corrected by one electronic prescription, and 5 segmental deformities were corrected by two electronic prescriptions. There was no incision infection and no neurovascular injury in the two groups. Conclusion:Both fluoroscopy and CT scan can obtain the mounting parameters of the Taylor Spatial Frame, and the results of correction of the peripheral deformities of the knee joint are satisfactory. However, CT measurement of the mounting parameters is more accurate which could achieve shorter operation time, and less times of electronic prescriptions.
RESUMO
Objective:To compare the clinical effect of Ilizarov frame and unilateral frame in the treatment of tibial segmental bone defect combined with soft tissue defect by open bone transport.Methods:A retrospective case-control study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 32 patients with tibial segmental bone defect and soft tissue defect-up who underwent open bone transport technique in Tianjin Hospital from August 2008 to August 2016 and obtained complete followed-up. There were 22 males and 10 females, aged 22-64 years (mean, 36.8 years). Nineteen patients in the Ilizarov group showed the mean bone defect length of 7.9 cm and mean soft tissue defect area of 41.4 cm 2. Thirteen patients in the unilateral group showed the mean bone defect length of 7.8 cm and the mean soft tissue defect area of 39.2 cm 2. The results of fracture healing, wound healing time, radiological consolidation index, external fixation index, Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) bone and lower-limb function score and incidence of complications were compared between the groups. Results:All patients were followed up for 24 to 60 months [(32.6±1.3)months]. Bone healing was achieved in all patients. The wound healing time was (2.7±2.3)days in Ilizarov group and (2.4±1.8)days in unilateral group ( P>0.05). The consolidation index was (43.4±8.7)d/cm in Ilizarov group and (45.8±10.3)d/cm in unilateral group ( P>0.05). The external fixation index was (52.6±8.9)d/cm in Ilizarov group and (58.7±12.9)d/cm in unilateral group ( P<0.05). The results of ASAMI bone score was excellent in 10 patients, good in 6, fair in 2 and poor in 1 in Ilizarov group, with the excellent rate of 84%; and excellent in 6 patients, good in 4, fair in 2, and poor in 1 in unilateral group, with the excellent rate of 77%, with insignificant difference between two groups ( P>0.05). The results of ASAMI lower-limb function score was excellent in 8 patients, good in 7, fair in 3, poor in 1 in Ilizarov group, with the excellent rate of 79%; and excellent in 6, good in 3, fair in 3, poor in 1 in unilateral group, with the excellent rate of 69%, with insignificant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05). Incidence of axial deviation was zero in Ilizarov group versus 23% in unilateral group ( P<0.05). After operation, Ilizarov group had refracture in 1 patient and pin site infection in 5, and unilateral group had refracture in 1 patient and pin site infection in 1, showing no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Tibial segmental bone defect with soft tissue defect can be effectively treated by open bone transport with Ilizarov and unilateral frame. Ilizarov frame has better biomechanical properties and is more convenient for correction of poor postoperative axial alignment.
RESUMO
Objective To evaluate the clinical outcomes and correction accuracy of deformities around the knee joint using external fixator-assisted internal fixation (FAIF).Methods From January 2014 to March 2018,data of 15 patients (17 bone segments) with deformities around the knee joint who had been corrected with external fixator-assisted internal fixation were retrospectively analyzed.There were 6 males and 9 females,with an average age of 39 years (range,21-60 years).There were 9 patients with genu varus and 6 with genu valgus.All the 15 patients had shortening ranging from 5 to 22 mm,with an average of 12 mm.Unilateral external fixator was used to stabilize the osteotomy site intraoperatively until the satisfied mechanical axis was acquired.Then the plate or Intramedullary nail was inserted and fixed,the external fixator was removed after internal fixation.Results Femur osteotomy was done in 7 patients and tibia osteotomy was done in 6 patients,while 2 patients had osteotomy in both tibia and femur.Intramedullary nailing was used in 2 bone segments,and plate was used in 15 bone segments.The correction of angle ranged from 7° to 22°,with an average of 12.5°.The correction of the 9 cases of genua varus ranged from 10° to 22°,with an average of 17.6°.The correction of the 6 cases of genu valgum ranged from 7° to 13°,with an average of 10.4°.The mean time to achieve union of the osteotomy sites was 3.5 months (range,2.5-5.0 months).All the 15 patients were followed up for 8-48 months (average,23 months).The mechanical axis deviation (MAD) was 5.93 mm (range,0-15 mm) after operation which was 34.8 mm (range,8-55 mm) before operation.The mean post-operative mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) was 87.5° (range,84°-90°) which was 76.1° (range,66°-82°) before operation.The mean medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA) was 87.8° (range,86°-89°) which was 76.8° (range,68°-80°) before operation.There were no deep infection and neurovascular injury.Conclusion The FAIF not only has the advantage of minimal invasiveness and easy adjustment,but also can avoid uncomfortableness and complications of long-term of wearing the external fixator.It is an accurate and safe method to correct the deformities around the knee joint.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND:It is crucial to determine the location of the rotation center of the hip joint using X-ray.Ranawat's triangle is commonly used to define the hip rotational center in bilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip and revision hip surgery especialy in cases with bone stock deficiency,but there are rare articles about its value in normal hip.OBJECTIVE:To compare the difference between Ranawat's triangle method and Mose circle method in determining the healthy hip joint rotational center.METHODS: We selected 30 patients with normal traumatic femoral neck fracture,who underwent unilateral total hip arthroplasty.Ranawat's triangle method and Mose circle method were applied to measure the anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis after arthroplasty and to compare the distance between the hip rotational center and the reference lines (X-axis: teardrop line; Y-axis: a line perpendicular to the X-axis,drawn from the intersection of theKohler line and the teardrop line.The distance from the hip joint rotational center to X-axis is dx1,dx2 and the distance to Y-axis is dy1,dy2 in Ranawat's triangle and Mose circle respectively.).We also compared the ratios (dx1/H,dy1/W; dx2/H,dy2/W) in the pelvic height (H: the distance between the highest point on the iliac wing and the lowest point on the ischial tuberosity) and width (W: the distance between the most lateral points on the iliac crests).RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:When the values were compared with both methods,highly significant differences were observed for both X and Y,Ranawat's triangle method dx1=(19.52±3.03) mm,dy1=(24.43±2.26) mm; and Mose circle method dx2=(11.90±3.55) mm,dy2=(34.29±3.79) mm (P＜0.001) and these ratios (dx1/H=0.0992±0.0133,dy1/W=0.0855±0.0069; dx2/H=0.0611±0.0194,dy2/W=0.1201±0.0178) in pelvic height and width (P＜ 0.001).Scatterplot results demonstrated that the hip rotational center identified by Ranawat's triangle method is near to the proximal end and medial end,which may affect mechanical environment surrounding the joint.For cases of bilateral hip dysplasia and joint revision,because of the changes in structure surrounding the acetabulum,Ranawat's triangle method can be a feasible method to identify the hip rotational center.For cases of unilateral lesion,Mose circle method can exactly identify the hip rotational center taking healthy side as a control.