Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-743766

RESUMO

Objective To analyze driver genes status and its clinical characteristics of advanced lung adenocarcinoma, then evaluate the status of first-line treatment in a single centric real-world. Methods EGFR, ALK, ROS-1 gene in 204 advanced lung adenocarcinoma tissue were tested by ARMS-PCR method. And the relationship between driver genes status and clinical characteristics was analyzed as the first line treatment in real clinical practice. Results The positive rate of driver genes status in 204 advanced lung adenocarcinoma was 53.9% (110/204) , including EGFR mutation 46.1% (94/204) , ALK positive 6.4% (13/204) and ROS1 positive 1.5% (3/204). The driving genes status was significantly correlated with gender, smoking history, tumor staging and serosal invasion (P < 0.05). There were significantly differences among the proportion of first-line standard treatment in different subgroup (P = 0.000) , the first-line standard treatment rate of EGFR mutation, ALK/ROS1 positive and drive gene negative were 77.7%, 37.5%, and 46.8% respectively. And the ratio of using 1 st generation EGFR-TKIs in all patients is 70.6% (60/85). Conclusion More than half of advanced lung adenocarcinoma have driver genes changes, and EGFR-TKI first-line treatment has higher acceptability in real-word.

2.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-239159

RESUMO

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the efficacy of the erlotinib versus gefitinib in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Fifty patients with untreated advanced EGFR mutation- positive NSCLC were randomly divided into gefitinib group (n=27) and erlotinib group (n=23). The progression-free survival, objective response rate and disease control rate were evaluated to compare the efficacy of gefitinib and erlotinib.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>There were no significant differences in the objective response rate (P=0.711) and disease control rate (P=0.861) between the two groups. The progression-free survival of gefitinib group and erlotinib group was 8.0 months and 10.0 months, respectively. The efficacy of the two drugs was similar (P=0.293).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>There is no significant differences between gefitinib and erlotinib in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.</p>


Assuntos
Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Tratamento Farmacológico , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Cloridrato de Erlotinib , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Tratamento Farmacológico , Mutação , Quinazolinas , Usos Terapêuticos , Receptores ErbB , Metabolismo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA