RESUMO
Objective To evaluate the short-term outcomes and postoperative inflammatory cytokine changes in patients with lung cancer treated with robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Methods A total of 270 patients with lung cancer treated by minimally invasive surgery were selected for the study, and the surgical procedures were selected according to the patients' economic conditions and preferences. Among them, 132 patients completed the operation through RATS, and 138 patients completed the operation through VATS. The clinical data of the two groups were compared. Results All patients successfully completed radical lung cancer surgery, and no perioperative deaths were reported. Intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage time, postoperative hospital stay, number of lymph nodes dissected, and number of lymph nodes dissected groups were more advantageous in the RATS group compared with the VATS group (P < 0.05). In terms of operative time, total postoperative chest drainage, and hospitalization cost, the VATS group had an advantage (P < 0.05). The postoperative levels of CRP, PCT, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and TNF-α increased in both groups, compared with preoperative levels, and the increases in the RATS group were lower than those in the VATS group. Conclusion RATS offers technical and short-term efficacy advantages for the treatment of lung cancer but comes with the disadvantage of high cost. Post-operative inflammatory cytokine elevation is lower in the RATS group, and inflammatory response to the organism is less severe.
RESUMO
Objective To compare the perioperative efficacy and safety of da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for treatment of anterior mediastinal tumors through subxiphoid versus lateral thoracic approaches under the laryngeal mask anesthesia. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 102 patients with anterior-mediastinal tumors treated by RATS under laryngeal mask anesthesia completed by the same operator. Forty-five patients underwent the subxiphoid approach (subxiphoid group), and 57 patients were treated with the lateral thoracic approach (lateral thoracic group). The operating time, intraoperative bleeding, and total postoperative drainage volume in the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results All patients successfully completed resection of the anterior mediastinal tumor without the occurrence of perioperative death. In terms of total postoperative drainage volume, postoperative drainage time, postoperative hospital stay, and VAS pain on postoperative days 2 and 3, the subxiphoid group was more advantages (P < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of operative time, docking time, total operative time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative day 1 VAS pain score, or postoperative complications (P > 0.05). Conclusion The subxiphoid approach of RATS is safe and feasible for resection of anterior mediastinal tumors. Compared with the lateral thoracic approach, the subxiphoid approach has advantages in terms of rapid postoperative recovery and postoperative pain.