RESUMO
Objective To investigate the incidence of recurrence and occurrence rate of recurrence of hand-foot-and-mouth disease (HFMD)in Jiangbei District of Ningbo City between 2012 and 2014,analyze the influencing fac-tors,and provide a scientific basis for the prevention and control of HFMD.Methods Data of HFMD in Jiangbei in 2012-2014 were collected from China Disease Surveillance Information System,immunization data were from Im-munization Programme Information System of Ningbo City,the recurrent infectious cases were selected and analyzed by descriptive epidemiological methods.Results The occurrence rate of recurrent HFMD in Jiangbei in 2012-2014 was 5.40% ,the median month of patients with single occurrence and recurrence of HFMD were 33.77(20.03, 47.83)and 38.26(22.05,54.75)months respectively,median month of patients with the initial occurrence were 23.93(15.87,36.87)months,median of time interval of recurrent HFMD was 10.27(5.23,16.06)months. The oc-currence rate of recurrence was the highest in 3- years old group(χ2= 37.51,P<0.001). Most were scattered chil-dren and children in child-care center. Female was a protective factor of recurrence of HFMD (OR,0.73[95% CI, 0.57-0.92]),while children in child-care center was a risk factor (OR,1 .46[95% CI,1 .16-1 .84]). The median attack rate of recurrence in HFMD group and control group in blocks within 7 days were 10.36(9.29,11.44)/100000 and 8.95(8.16,9.74)/100000 respectively,there was significant difference(Z= -2.68,P<0.001). In-oculation frequency between recurrent HFMD group and control group was not significantly different (Z= -1.38,P= 0.17).Conclusion The epidemic of recurrence of HFMD was serious in Jiangbei District of Ningbo City between 2012 and 2014,boys and children in child-care center should be paid attention,contacts with patients should be re-duced,and targeted prevention and control measures should be carried out.
RESUMO
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of three different methods of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE).Methods The clinical data of patients with LCBDE treated in our hospital by the same surgeon from January 2010 to December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed.These patients were divided into three groups according to the 3 surgical methods:Group A:15 patients were treated with laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE).Group B:85 patients were treated with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration followed by primary duct closure (LCBDEPDC).Group C:20 patients were treated with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and T tube drainage (LCBDE-TD).The study measured the TBIL,inner diameter of common bile duct,costs,length of operation,postoperative hospital stay,peritoneal drainage time,and operation-related complications.Results The operations were successfully carried out in the 3 groups of patients.When compared with group C,group A and group B had significantly shorter operative time,shorter postoperative hospital stay,shorter peritoneal drainage time,lower hospital costs,and earlier return to work (P＜0.05).The only significant difference between group A and group B was the peritoneal drainage time.There was no significant difference in the incidences of postoperative complications between the 3 groups (P＞0.05).Conclusions The three different methods of LCBDE had their own indications.LTCBDE was better than primary suture,and LCBDEPDC was better than T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.
RESUMO
Objective To investigate the preventive effect of postoperative pancreatic leakage by continuous invaginated pancreaticoenterostomy in pancraticoduodenectomy. Methods Twenty-twopancraticoduodenectomy procedures were performed by continuous invaginated pancreaticoenterostomy with 4-0 absorbable suture and the results were compared with those of 12 end-to-side invagination interrupted suture procedures and 23 pancreatic duct jejunum anastomosis procedures. Results All continuous invaginated pancreaticoenterostomy cases were performed successfully with the average time of 13 minutes, and one biliary leak occurred postoperatively; and there was no pancreatic anastomotic leak and no death. The mean hospital stay of the patients was 15 days. While the mean time of end-to-side invagination interrupted suture procedures was 20 minutes, one biliary leak and one abdominal infection occurred, and one patient died of abdominal bleeding. The mean time of pancreatic duct jejunum anastomosis procedures was 18 minutes, and one pancreatic leak and one upper gastrointestinal bleeding occurred. The mean postoperative hospital stay of these patients was 19 days. Conclusions Continuous invaginated pancreaticoenterostomy is applicable to any situation in the residual pancreas, and has the advantages of easy to operate, time saving and less complications, thus it is an effective improvement of pancreaticoenterostomy.