RESUMO
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of combining modified manipulative reduction with functional training for the treatment of acute anterior disc displacement without reduction.Methods:Sixty anterior disc displacement patients aged from 19 to 55 years were randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group, each of 30. The experimental group was given modified manipulative reduction, while the control group was provided with traditional manipulative reduction. After the manipulative reduction, both groups received 3 months of functional training. Visual analog scale (VAS) ratings, maximum active mouth opening, a mandibular movement index and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were employed before and immediately after the reduction and after the functional training to evaluate their effectiveness. An oral health-related quality of life scale was also used. The number of attempts needed to achieve successful reduction and the overall success rate were compared between the two groups.Results:There was significant improvement in the average VAS ratings, maximum active mouth opening, mandibular movement index and oral health-related life quality of both groups after the experiment. Immediately after reduction, the maximum active mouth opening and mandible movement in the experimental group were significantly higher than in the control group, on average. Further improvement was observed after the treatment such that there was no significant difference between the two groups. After the functional training, however, the experimental group′s average VAS and oral health-related life quality scores were significantly better than the control group′s averages. According to MRI right after reduction, the success rate of the experimental group (96.7%) was significantly better than among the control group (80%). After the functional training the corresponding values were 86.7% and 73.3%. That difference was no longer significant. There was also no significant difference in the number of attempts needed to achieve successful reduction.Conclusion:The modified manipulative reduction not only has a higher success rate, but also can immediately improve mouth opening and mandible mobility. Combined with functional training, it can effectively reduce pain and improve life quality.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE:To provide reference for promoting the rational use of Dexamethasone sodium phosphate injection in the clinic. METHODS:Special comment criteria and evaluation rules was formulated,medical records of 1273 inpatients receiving Dexamethasone sodium phosphate injection were collected from our hospital during Jul. 2014-Jun. 2015. Rationality of drug use was evaluated and analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS:The most use amount and case number of Dexamethasone sodium phosphate injection were in the departments of blood/oncology,obstetrics,emergency minimally invasive surgery,gastrointestinal surgery,emergency trauma of orthopedics and thyroid breast surgery;while much less were in departments of new pediatrics, infection and rehabilitation. There were 138 cases of irrational use of Dexamethasone sodium phosphate injection found in special comment, and the total irrational use rate was 10.84％ . The types of irrational use included inappropriate indication (contraindication,59.42％),inappropriate drug combination(18.84％),inappropriate drug selection (15.94％),inappropriate usage and dosage(3.62％)and inappropriate drug dosage forms or drug delivery methods(2.17％),etc. The irrational use rate of Dexamethasone sodium phosphate injection monthly declined steadily by month from 30.35％ in Jul. 2014 to 7.81％ in Jun. 2015 through the special comment;then a consensus of 5 points for the drug use formed in our hospital. CONCLUSIONS:There are irrational situations in the clinical use of Dexamethasone sodium phosphate injection in our hospital,especially in the cases of inappropriate indications. The rationality of the drug can be improved by the development of the special comment. This work should continue to be carried out in the future and perfected.