Should indications for laterally extended endopelvic resection (LEER) exclude patients with sciatica? / 부인종양

Objective@#Previously, indications for laterally extended endopelvic resection (LEER) have excluded patients with sciatica because R0 resection has not been deemed possible [1].Because laparoscopy optimizes visualization and thus provides for meticulous dissection, we hypothesized that R0 resection can be achieved by means of laparoscopic LEER in patients with sciatica. This video article aimed to clarify the technical feasibility of laparoscopic LEER performed for laterally recurrent previously irradiated cervical cancer with concomitant sciatica. @*Methods@#We investigated technical feasibility of laparoscopic LEER performed as a salvage therapy following abdominal radical hysterectomy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy in a patient suffering laterally recurrent cervical carcinoma with concomitant sciatica. The recurrent tumor involved the right external and internal iliac artery and vein, ileocecum, rectosigmoid colon, right ureter, right obturator nerve, and right sciatic nerve, with a resulting fistula between the tumor and the rectosigmoid colon, and severe sciatica.Resection of all these structures was essential for achievement of R0 status, and such resection means concomitant femoral bypass with prosthetic graft interposition and gastrointestinal/urinary tract resection. @*Results@#Laparoscopic LEER with femoral-femoral artery bypass could be conducted without any postoperative complications. Pathological R0 resection could be achieved, and local recurrence could have been controlled. However, the patient died from liver and lung metastasis at 1 year after this resection surgery. @*Conclusion@#Laparoscopic LEER for a laterally recurrent previously irradiated cervical cancer with concomitant sciatica was technically feasible, however, further study involving a greater number of patients and longer follow-up period is warranted to determine the stringent indications.

Should indications for laterally extended endopelvic resection (LEER) exclude patients with sciatica? / 부인종양

Objective@#Previously, indications for laterally extended endopelvic resection (LEER) have excluded patients with sciatica because R0 resection has not been deemed possible [1].Because laparoscopy optimizes visualization and thus provides for meticulous dissection, we hypothesized that R0 resection can be achieved by means of laparoscopic LEER in patients with sciatica. This video article aimed to clarify the technical feasibility of laparoscopic LEER performed for laterally recurrent previously irradiated cervical cancer with concomitant sciatica. @*Methods@#We investigated technical feasibility of laparoscopic LEER performed as a salvage therapy following abdominal radical hysterectomy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy in a patient suffering laterally recurrent cervical carcinoma with concomitant sciatica. The recurrent tumor involved the right external and internal iliac artery and vein, ileocecum, rectosigmoid colon, right ureter, right obturator nerve, and right sciatic nerve, with a resulting fistula between the tumor and the rectosigmoid colon, and severe sciatica.Resection of all these structures was essential for achievement of R0 status, and such resection means concomitant femoral bypass with prosthetic graft interposition and gastrointestinal/urinary tract resection. @*Results@#Laparoscopic LEER with femoral-femoral artery bypass could be conducted without any postoperative complications. Pathological R0 resection could be achieved, and local recurrence could have been controlled. However, the patient died from liver and lung metastasis at 1 year after this resection surgery. @*Conclusion@#Laparoscopic LEER for a laterally recurrent previously irradiated cervical cancer with concomitant sciatica was technically feasible, however, further study involving a greater number of patients and longer follow-up period is warranted to determine the stringent indications.

Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer / 부인종양

OBJECTIVES: Intraoperative tumor manipulation and dissemination may possibly compromise survival of women with early-stage cervical cancer who undergo minimally-invasive radical hysterectomy (RH). The objective of the study was to examine survival related to minimally-invasive RH with a “no-look no-touch” technique for clinical stage IB1 cervical cancer. METHODS: This retrospective study compared patients who underwent total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (TLRH) with no-look no-touch technique (n=80) to those who underwent an abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH; n=83) for stage IB1 (≤4 cm) cervical cancer. TLRH with no-look no-touch technique incorporates 4 specific measures to prevent tumor spillage: 1) creation of a vaginal cuff, 2) avoidance of a uterine manipulator, 3) minimal handling of the uterine cervix, and 4) bagging of the specimen. RESULTS: Surgical outcomes of TLRH were significantly superior to ARH for operative time (294 vs. 376 minutes), estimated blood loss (185 vs. 500 mL), and length of hospital stay (14 vs. 18 days) (all, p < 0.001). Oncologic outcomes were similar between the 2 groups, including disease-free survival (DFS) (p=0.591) and overall survival (p=0.188). When stratified by tumor size (<2 vs. ≥2 cm), DFS was similar between the 2 groups (p=0.897 and p=0.602, respectively). The loco-regional recurrence rate following TLRH was similar to the rate after ARH (6.3% vs. 9.6%, p=0.566). Multiple-pelvic recurrence was observed in only 1 patient in the TLRH group. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the no-look no-touch technique may be a useful surgical procedure to reduce recurrence risk via preventing intraoperative tumor spillage during TLRH for early-stage cervical cancer.

Unexpected result of minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer / 부인종양

No abstract available.