Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-900140

RESUMO

Objective@#: The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for distal adding on (AO) or distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated by posterior spinal fusion (PSF) to L3 with a minimum 2-year follow-up. @*Methods@#: AIS patients undergoing PSF to L3 by two senior surgeons from 2000–2010 were analyzed. Distal AO and DJK were deemed poor radiographic results and defined as >3 cm of deviation from L3 to the center sacral vertical line (CSVL), or >10° angle at L3–4 on the posterior anterior- or lateral X-ray at ultimate follow-up. New stable vertebra (SV) and neutral vertebra (NV) scores were defined for this study. The total stability (TS) score was the sum of the SV and NV scores. @*Results@#: Ten of 76 patients (13.1%) were included in the poor radiographic outcome group. The other 66 patients were included in the good radiographic outcome group. Lower Risser grade, more SV-3 (CSVL doesn’t touch the lowest instrumented vertebra [LIV]) on standing and side bending films, lesser NV and TS score, rigid L3–4 disc, more rotation and deviation of L3 were identified risk factors for AO or DJK. Age, number of fused vertebrae, curve correction, preoperative coronal/sagittal L3–4 disc angle did not differ significantly between the two groups. Multiple logistic regression results indicated that preoperative Risser grade 0, 1 (odds ratio [OR], 1.8), SV-3 at L3 in standing and side benders (OR, 2.1 and 2.8, respectively), TS score -5, -6 at L3 (OR, 4.4), rigid disc at L3–4 (OR, 3.1), LIV rotation >15° (OR, 2.9), and LIV deviation >2 cm from CSVL (OR, 2.2) were independent predictive factors. Although there was significant improvement of the of Scoliosis Research Society-22 average scores only in the good radiographic outcome group, there was no significant difference in the scores between the groups. @*Conclusion@#: The prevalence of AO or DJK at ultimate follow-up for AIS with LIV at L3 was 13.1%. To prevent AO or DJK following fusion to L3, we recommend that the CSVL touch L3 in both standing and side bending, TS score is -4 or less, the L3/4 disc is flexible, L3 is neutral (<15°) and ≤2 cm from the midline and the patient is ≥ Risser 2.

2.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-892436

RESUMO

Objective@#: The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for distal adding on (AO) or distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated by posterior spinal fusion (PSF) to L3 with a minimum 2-year follow-up. @*Methods@#: AIS patients undergoing PSF to L3 by two senior surgeons from 2000–2010 were analyzed. Distal AO and DJK were deemed poor radiographic results and defined as >3 cm of deviation from L3 to the center sacral vertical line (CSVL), or >10° angle at L3–4 on the posterior anterior- or lateral X-ray at ultimate follow-up. New stable vertebra (SV) and neutral vertebra (NV) scores were defined for this study. The total stability (TS) score was the sum of the SV and NV scores. @*Results@#: Ten of 76 patients (13.1%) were included in the poor radiographic outcome group. The other 66 patients were included in the good radiographic outcome group. Lower Risser grade, more SV-3 (CSVL doesn’t touch the lowest instrumented vertebra [LIV]) on standing and side bending films, lesser NV and TS score, rigid L3–4 disc, more rotation and deviation of L3 were identified risk factors for AO or DJK. Age, number of fused vertebrae, curve correction, preoperative coronal/sagittal L3–4 disc angle did not differ significantly between the two groups. Multiple logistic regression results indicated that preoperative Risser grade 0, 1 (odds ratio [OR], 1.8), SV-3 at L3 in standing and side benders (OR, 2.1 and 2.8, respectively), TS score -5, -6 at L3 (OR, 4.4), rigid disc at L3–4 (OR, 3.1), LIV rotation >15° (OR, 2.9), and LIV deviation >2 cm from CSVL (OR, 2.2) were independent predictive factors. Although there was significant improvement of the of Scoliosis Research Society-22 average scores only in the good radiographic outcome group, there was no significant difference in the scores between the groups. @*Conclusion@#: The prevalence of AO or DJK at ultimate follow-up for AIS with LIV at L3 was 13.1%. To prevent AO or DJK following fusion to L3, we recommend that the CSVL touch L3 in both standing and side bending, TS score is -4 or less, the L3/4 disc is flexible, L3 is neutral (<15°) and ≤2 cm from the midline and the patient is ≥ Risser 2.

3.
Artigo em Coreano | WPRIM | ID: wpr-104017

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective radiographic study. OBJECTIVES: We wanted to describe and quantify the common variations in the sagittal lumbar spine. SUMMARY OF THE LITERATURE REVIEW: No previous study of the spinopelvic parameters with a large cohort of asymptomatic young men was performed on subjects with the same ethnic background. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 166 young males without disease, trauma or a history of operation on the spine or lower extremities were included. The sagittal standing radiographs of the whole spine on 36 inch film were taken. The distances from the plumb line of C7, T12, the lumbar apex and the bicoxofemoral head to the posterosuperior corner of the sacrum were measured. Thoracic kyphosis, thoracolumbar kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, the segmental vertebral slopes, the sacral slope and the pelvic incidence were measured. Groups 1 and 2 were classified by having a sacral slope less than 35degrees (group 1: apex below L4, group 2: above L4). Group 3 had a sacral slope between 35degrees and 45degrees, and group 4 had a sacral slope greater than 45degrees. RESULTS: The average age was 21.8 years (range: 19~26 years). Group 1 contained 37 cases, group 2 had 44, group 3 had 62 and group 4 had 23. Thoracolumbar kyphosis was significantly increased in group 1 and lumbar lordosis and pelvic incidence were increased in groups 3 and 4. Thoracic kyphosis and the vertebral slope of T12 did not demonstrate any difference between the groups. CONCLUSION: The sagittal spinopelvic parameters showed significant changes according to the morphology of the lower lumbar spine. Understanding the patterns of variation in the spinopelvic parameters may help surgeons to plan treatment for various spinal lesions.


Assuntos
Animais , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos de Coortes , Cabeça , Incidência , Cifose , Lordose , Extremidade Inferior , Estudos Prospectivos , Sacro , Coluna Vertebral
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA