Evaluation of the effect of analgesics for cancer patients using their pain descriptions

<b>Purpose</b>: The present study aims to evaluate the effect of analgesics in cancer patients based on their pain descriptions. <b>Methods</b>: The relationship between the words that patients used to describe their pain due to cancer and the efficacy of treatment with analgesics such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or opioids was evaluated. <b>Results</b>: We recorded 529words that were used by 164patients to describe their pain and pain quality and classified them into 108types of pain.For patients who used the actual word 'dull' or one with a similar meaning, treatment with opioids was effective. However, treatment with opioids was less effective in patients who used words such as "numb" and "tingling". <b>Conclusion</b>: We were able to gain a good understanding of cancer pain by listening to the actual words that patients used when complaining of pain. These findings suggested that we could choose a suitable medication through evaluation of the actual words cancer patients used to describe their pain and successfully relieve their pain. Palliat Care Res 2009: 4(1): 207-213

The current state of patient education for opioids by doctors, nurses and pharmacists, and evaluation of a pamphlet

The first step of cancer medical treatment is to eliminate anxiety about opioids. It is recommended to use printed matter in the "Guideline for Cancer Pain Management" edited by Japanese Society of Palliative Medicine,but few medical professionals actually use it. We developed the Opioids' pamphlet designed by Aichi Prefectural Society of Hospital Pharmacists; abbreviated OPA. This pamphlet is little burdened for readers; focusing on eliminating anxiety about opioids. Evaluation of the utility of the OPA and the actual conditions of patient education about the use of opioids by medical professionals were investigated, since there have been no reports on these issues. A questionnaire survey was conducted in hospitals with more than 150 beds in Aichi Prefecture. It targeted doctors, pharmacists and nurses who were practicing palliative care using opioids. There were many pharmacists and nurses who had been consulted about opioids, and most of the consultations were about addiction. 60% of pharmacists and 30% of nurses voluntarily performed patient education. Awareness of the guideline for of cancer pain management was low. OPA, which was reviewed based on the guideline, was applicable to 99% of the cases where the nurses were consulted. Its size and contents were highly acclaimed. Therefore, OPA is extremely valuable in clinical practice. Palliat Care Res 2009; 4(1): 214-227