Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine ; : 650-658, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-52020

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect and safety of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program in high-risk cardiac patients and compare these results to those of control CR participants without high-risk criteria. METHODS: A total of 12 high-risk cardiac patients were recruited as subjects. The high-risk criteria were: advanced heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of less than 30%, a recent history of cardiac arrest or dangerous arrhythmia, and cardiac device insertion. Another 12 CR participants without any high-risk criteria mentioned above were recruited as controls. Both groups underwent 6 to 8 weeks of CR exercise training. Exercise tolerance tests were performed before and after completion of the CR program. After CR completion, both groups were evaluated and their results were compared. RESULTS: After completion of the CR exercise program, both groups showed significant increases in peak oxygen uptake (VO(2peak)) and LVEF. In the control group (n=12), VO(2peak) increased from 25.9 to 31.8 mL/kg/min (changing rate, +21.4%±22.1%) and LVEF increased from 56.1% to 59.1% (changing rate, +5.3%±8.4%). In the high-risk group (n=12), VO(2peak) increased from 16.8 to 21.0 mL/kg/min (changing rate, +28.6%±21.4%) and LVEF increased from 26.1% to 29.4% (changing rate, +16.1%±12.9%). There was no serious cardiovascular event during all exercise hours. CONCLUSION: High-risk cardiac patients who completed a supervised CR program demonstrated significant improvements in VO(2peak) and LVEF without any serious cardiovascular event. The improvement rate was similar to that of control group.


Assuntos
Humanos , Arritmias Cardíacas , Desfibriladores , Tolerância ao Exercício , Parada Cardíaca , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Oxigênio , Reabilitação , Volume Sistólico
2.
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine ; : 658-667, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-114397

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term effects and advantages of ultrasound (US)-guided selective cervical nerve root block with fluoroscopy (FL)-guided transforaminal block. METHODS: From March 2009 to November 2012, 162 patients received steroid injections for lower cervical radicular pain. A total of 114 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All procedures were performed by using US or FL. We compared the intravascular injections during the procedure with the effects and functional scales at 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure between the two groups. Successful treatments occurred when patients obtained significant pain reliefs (as measured by >50% improvements in the verbal numerical scale [VNS] score and >40% improvements in the neck disability index [NDI] score) and reported a patient satisfaction score of 3 or 4 points at 12 months after the injection. Image analysis of intravascular injection and chart review were performed. Logistic regression was performed to reveal the correlations between successful treatments and variables (patient's age, gender, duration of the disease, cause, injection method, and radiologic finding). RESULTS: The VNS and NDI improved 3 months after the injection and continued to improve until 12 months for both groups. But there were no statistical differences in changes of VNS, NDI, and effectiveness between these two groups. The proportion of patients with successful treatment is illustrated as 62.5% in US-guided group and 58% in FL-guided group at 12 months. There were no significant differences between the groups or during follow-up periods. Three cases of the intravascular injections were done in FL-guided group. CONCLUSION: The US-guided selective cervical nerve root blocks are facilitated by identifying critical vessels at unexpected locations relative to the foramen and to protect injury to such vessels, which is the leading cause of reported complications from FL-guided transforaminal blocks. On treatment effect, significant long-term improvements in functions and pain reliefs were observed in both groups after the intervention. However, significant differences were not observed between the groups. Therefore, the US-guided selective cervical nerve root block was shown to be as effective as the FL-guided transforaminal block in pain reliefs and functional improvements, in addition to the absence of radiation and protection vessel injury at real-time imaging.


Assuntos
Humanos , Fluoroscopia , Seguimentos , Modelos Logísticos , Pescoço , Bloqueio Nervoso , Satisfação do Paciente , Radiculopatia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ultrassonografia , Pesos e Medidas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA