RESUMO
Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of the treatment on postoperative pain of anal disease by ear-point taping and pressuring. Methods Using random number table method,118 patients with postoperative pain of anal diseases were divided into 5 groups, namely 26 cases of analgesia group treated by main ear-point, 20 cases of group one treated by analgesia compatibility ear-point, 22 cases of group two treated by analgesia compatibility ear-point, 27 patients of group three treated by analgesia compatibility ear-point, and 23 patients of control group. The main ear-point for analgesia included TF(4) and the sensitive point matching with diseased area;Based on the main ear-point, compatibility ear-point group one add to AT(4)、CO(18)、AH(6a);compatibility ear-point group two add to CO(7)、HX(2)、HX(5);compatibility ear-point group three add to AH(6a)、AT(4)、HX(5);and the control group was treated with oral indomethacin tablets. All five groups were treated for 30 min, and the clinical analgesic efficacy and safety were evaluated. Results Pain scores decreased rates of the main ear-point analgesia group, compatibility ear-point analgesia group one, compatibility ear-point analgesia group two, compatibility ear-point analgesia group three, and the control analgesia group at 10 min after treatment was (6.49±1.98)%, (5.90±1.52)%, (6.10±2.22)%, (6.64±2.25)%, and (7.61± 1.10)%respectively. Compared with the control group , the main ear-point analgesia group or the compatibility ear-point analgesia group one or the compatibility ear-point analgesia group two, the difference was significant (P0.05). Conclusion The effects of 10 min treatment of ear-point taping and pressuring treating postoperative pain of anal disease was significantly better than the control group,however the 30 min treatment did not show significant difference.
RESUMO
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of standardized seton therapy combined with the counterparts drainage improved surgical approach on the treatment of high anal fistula,and to form the technical specifications and application programs.Methods 120 patients of high anal fistula (simple and complex) from three centers were randomly divided into a treatment group and a control group,60 cases in each group.SPSS 16.0 was used to make a statistical analysis on actual enrolled patients,fall off and excluded patients.Demographics,distribution of cases and baseline data were also compared between the two groups to determine the efficacy and safety.The treatment group was treated with a modified hanging line with their counterpart drainage; while the control group was treated with traditional low cut high hanging line method.The length of healing time,hung off times,healing time,postoperative pain,anal and manometry were observed in both groups.Results Among 120 cases,118 eases were effective and 2 eases excluded off Healing time of the treatment group (29.87±3.93)d was less than the control group(35.32±8.61)d,P＜0.05.Hang off time of the treatment group (13.73±3.15)d was less than the control group (14.98±6.84) d,P＜0.05.Although the postoperative pain scores of the treatment group was lower than the control group,but with not statistical significance.Anal manometry was within the normal range,and anal function was not affected.Conclusion The quantitative hung up with the improved counterparts drainage surgical methods were safe and effective in the treatment of high anal fistula.