RESUMO
Objective@#To understand the working categories of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) nursing and its existing problems, and to provide a realistic basis for the construction of primary PCI in clinical nursing.@*Methods@#Qualitative interviews were used to carry out semi-structured and personal in-depth interviews among 5 doctors and 27 nurses in 5 hospitals. 7 step analysis of Colaizzi was used to analyze the data.@*Results@#The working categories of primary PCI nursing involves professional team management, early identification, preoperative preparation, evaluation and predictive nursing, disease observation, safe transfer, psychological nursing and health guidance.@*Conclusion@#Primary PCI nursing is still in the stage of continuous optimization, but some parts of the process are not standardized and the nursing behavior is inconsistent. Primary PCI nursing needs to form nursing behavior norms under the guidelines of evidence-based medicine.
RESUMO
Objective To understand the working categories of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) nursing and its existing problems, and to provide a realistic basis for the construction of primary PCI in clinical nursing. Methods Qualitative interviews were used to carry out semi-structured and personal in-depth interviews among 5 doctors and 27 nurses in 5 hospitals. 7 step analysis of Colaizzi was used to analyze the data. Results The working categories of primary PCI nursing involves professional team management, early identification, preoperative preparation, evaluation and predictive nursing, disease observation, safe transfer, psychological nursing and health guidance. Conclusion Primary PCI nursing is still in the stage of continuous optimization, but some parts of the process are not standardized and the nursing behavior is inconsistent. Primary PCI nursing needs to form nursing behavior norms under the guidelines of evidence-based medicine.
RESUMO
Objective To study the application of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA),carbohydrate antigens19-9 (CA19-9) and carbohydrate antigens72-4 (CA72-4) in the diagnosis of gastric cancer.Methods A total of 78 patients with gastric cancer underwent treatment in our hospital from August,2007 to June,2011 were enrolled as the case group.A total of 78 patients with benign gastric diseases and 78 healthy residents of the same period and district were randomly selected as the benign group and healthy control group,respectively.Measurements of serum CA72-4,CA19-9,CEA of all the cases and control group were performed.And the measurements of the three groups were statistically compared.Results The Serum concentration of CA72-4,CA19-9,CEA were significantly higher than the other two groups [CEA:(27.56 ± 18.36) μg/L vs (2.44 ±0.97) μg/L vs (2.37 ± 1.25) μg/L,F =145.346,P ＜0.0001 ; CA19-9:(99.87 ±80.53) kU/L vs (18.21 ±10.36) kU/Lvs (17.48 ±9.66) kU/L,F=78.503,P＜0.0001; CA72-4:(56.13 ±39.26)kU/L vs (5.77 ±2.95) kU/L vs (3.62 ±2.18) kU/L,F =133.892,P ＜0.0001].And the positive rate of the gastric cancer group were significantly higher than those of the other two groups [CEA:69.23％,10.26％and 7.69％; CA19-9:57.69％,23.07％ and 20.51％; CA72-4:83.33％,10.26％ and 8.97％].The combination of the 3 measurements obtained the highest accuracy of diagnosis,while for single measurement,CA72-4 had the highest accuracy.Conclusion CEA,CA19-9 and CA72-4 have a significant meaning in the early diagnosis of gastric cancer,which has high sensitivity and specificity.The detection rate of the gastric cancer will be improved if the test of CEA,CA19-9 and CA72-4 are combined.
RESUMO
Objective To compare and analyze the changes of CEA,CA19-9,CA72-4 in different pathologictypes of gastric cancer.Methods 93 patients with gastric cancer were divided into different groups according to the histological types,pathologic types and TNM staging.The levels of CEA,CA19-9,CA72-4 of the patients were measured,then the results were compared and analyzed.Results The level of serum tumor marker of the moderately differentiated group was obviously higher than that of well-differentiated group(P ＜ 0.05),while the level of serum tumor marker of the poorly differentiated group was obviously higher than that of moderately differentiated group (P ＜ 0.05).The differences of levels of CEA,CA19-9,CA72-4 between the well-differentiated group,moderately differentiatedgroup and poorly differentiated group were statistically significant(F =61.433,57.882,125.547,all P ＜ 0.05).The differences of levels of CEA,CA19-9,CA72-4 between patients of TMN Ⅰ stage,TMN Ⅱ stage,TMN Ⅲ stage,TMN Ⅳstage were statistically significant(F =189.624,95.236,80.342,all P ＜ 0.05).The difference of serum tumor marker between different histological groups was not statistically significant (all P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion The concentration of serum CEA,CA19-9,CA72-4 will be higher if the gastric tumor is poorly differentiated or invades deeply,but the concentration of serum tumor has nothing to do with the histological types of the tumor.