RESUMO
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>The objective of this article is to summarize the development of evaluation and treatment of posterior malleolus fracture (PMF).</p><p><b>DATA SOURCES</b>Data used in this review were mainly from English literature of PubMed data base. Study selection Articles were included in this review if they were related to the PMF or trimalleolar fracture.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>No consensus was found regarding what sizes of posterior malleolus fragments would lead to ankle instability thus affecting prognosis and should be fixed. X-ray measurement is unreliable, while CT scan is widely recommended and it can recognize the occult posterior malleolus fractures associated with tibia shaft fractures, which are always undetected previously. Direct posterior malleolus fixation is suitable to stabilize syndesmotic injury. The basic and clinical researches support direct reduction and buttress plate fixation of posterior malleolus fracture through the posterolateral approach. Operative indications and timing of weight bearing are still in discussion.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Knowing whether ankle instability occurs and the proper methods to diagnose, evaluate, and operate can help manage the fracture. Further biomechanical research on ankle stability and clinical study to compare various treatment methods are required.</p>
Assuntos
Humanos , Traumatismos do Tornozelo , Cirurgia Geral , Fraturas Ósseas , Cirurgia Geral , Procedimentos Ortopédicos , Métodos , Fraturas da Tíbia , Cirurgia GeralRESUMO
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To assess the value of preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer after radical operation.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Clinical data of 140 patients with colorectal cancer undergoing radical operation in the Department of General Surgery of General Hospital of PLA from July 2005 to July 2011 were analyzed retrospectively. According to preoperative NLR, patients were divided into the low NLR group (NLR<5, n=105) and the high NLR group (NLR≥5, n=35). The overall 5-year survival rates of two groups were compared and the independent risk factors were examined by univariate analysis and Cox model.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The overall 5-year survival rates of the low and high NLR groups were 74.8% and 54.7% respectively with significant difference (P=0.03). Univariate analysis revealed depth of tumor, lymph nodes metastasis, TMN stage and NLR were associated with survival (P<0.05, P<0.01). Cox model showed that NLR was independent risk factor of prognosis (RR=1.068, 95%CI:1.009-1.129, P=0.02).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Preoperative NLR≥5 predicts poorer prognosis of colorectal cancer patients.</p>
Assuntos
Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Colorretais , Sangue , Diagnóstico , Patologia , Metástase Linfática , Linfócitos , Patologia , Neutrófilos , Patologia , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To explore the prognostic factors of anorectal malignant melanoma (ARMM).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Medical records and follow-up data of 34 patients with ARMM treated in the Chinese PLA General Hospital from March 1993 to November 2011 were analyzed retrospectively.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>There were 26 abdominoperineal resections(APR) and 8 wide local excisions (WLE). Twenty patients underwent postoperative adjuvant therapy, including chemotherapy in 14 cases, radiotherapy in 2 cases, traditional Chinese medicine therapy in 4 cases and immunotherapy in 16 cases. Postoperative follow-up was carried out in all the patients and the mean follow-up period was 27 months. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 76.3%, 39.6% and 20.6% respectively, while the 1-, 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 60.6%, 30.8% and 12.8% respectively. APR and postoperative immunotherapy could significantly reduce the local recurrence rate. According to the Kaplan-Meier method, gross type of tumor, mural involvement, lymph metastasis, and clinical staging had significant effects on overall survival, while lymph metastasis and postoperative immunotherapy on disease-free survival. Cox proportional hazards model indicated that the clinical staging and postoperative immunotherapy were significant predictive factors.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Early diagnosis and correct choice of surgical method are the keys to the treatment. Postoperative immunotherapy can prolong disease-free survival.</p>
Assuntos
Humanos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Metástase Linfática , Melanoma , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>The Da Vinci system is a newly developed device for colorectal surgery. With advanced stereoscopic vision, lack of tremor, and the ability to rotate the instruments surgeons find that robotic systems are ideal laparoscopic tools. Since conventional laparoscopic total mesorectal excision is a challenging procedure, we have sought to assess the utility of the Da Vinci robotic system in anterior resections for rectal cancer.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Between November 2010 and December 2011, a total of 22 patients affected by rectal cancer were operated on with robotic technique, using the Da Vinci robot. Data regarding the outcome and pathology reports were prospectively collected in a dedicated database.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>There were no conversions to open surgery and no postoperative mortality of any patient. Mean operative time was (220 ± 46) minutes (range, 152 - 286 minutes). The median number of lymph nodes harvested was (14.6 ± 6.5) (range, 8 - 32), and the circumferential margin was negative in all cases. The distal margin was (2.6 ± 1.2) cm (range, 1.0 - 5.5 cm). The mean length of hospital stay was (7.8 ± 2.6) days (range, 7.0 - 13.0 days). Macroscopic grading of the specimen was complete in 19 cases and nearly complete in three patients.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Robotic anterior resection for rectal surgery is safe and feasible in experienced hands. Outcome and pathology findings are comparable with those observed in open and laparoscopy procedures. This technique may facilitate minimally invasive radical rectal surgery.</p>