RESUMO
Objective To compare the clinical results of surgical and conservative treatment of acute patellar dislocations.Methods Retrospective analyzed the clinical data of 35 patients with acute patellar dislocations from June 2004 to October 2009,and divided the patients into 2 groups.One group with 18 patients underwent surgical treatments,and the other group with 17 patients underwent conservative treatments,record the number of relapses cases of both the two groups.A radiographic examination was performed in the evaluation of the patients,and the Kujala questionnaire was applied with the intention of analyzing the improvement of pain and quality of life.Results All patients were followed up for more than 12 months.(1) The conservative treatment group exhibited a higher number of recurrent dislocations (7 patients) (41.2％) than the surgical treatment group,which did not have any relapses (x2 =9.265,P =0.002).(2) The patellar tilt returned to normal in the surgical group,while 8 patients returned to normal in the conservative group,with statistical difference between groups (x2 =10.980,P =0.001).And the lateral shift ratio returned to normal in the surgical group,while 6 patients returned to normal in the conservative group,with statistical difference between groups(x2 =7.667,P =0.006).(3)The surgical treatment group obtained a significantly better mean score on the Kujala test than preoperative ((90 ± 5) vs.(58 ± 6),t =16.465,P ＜ 0.01) ; The conservative treatment group,compared with the preoperative,is not improved obviously ((72 ± 6) vs.(62 ± 8),t =0.943,P ＞ 0.05) ;Postoperative group comparison,surgical group was higher than that in conservative group,there was significant difference between two groups (t =12.256,P ＜ 0.01).Conclusion For acute patellar dislocation,surgical treatment can significantly restore patellar stability,improve the function of knee joint.