Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery ; (12): 475-484, 2023.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-986816

RESUMO

Objective: To methodically assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted total rectal mesenteric resection (RTME), laparoscopic-assisted total rectal mesenteric resection (laTME), and transanal total rectal mesenteric resection (taTME). Methods: A computer search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Ovid databases to identify English-language reports published between January 2017 and January 2022 that compared the clinical efficacy of the three surgical procedures of RTME, laTME, and taTME. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the NOS and JADAD scales for retrospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials, respectively. Direct meta-analysis and reticulated meta-analysis were performed using Review Manager software and R software, respectively. Results: Twenty-nine publications comprising 8,339 patients with rectal cancer were ultimately included. The direct meta-analysis indicated that the length of hospital stay was longer after RTME than after taTME, whereas according to the reticulated meta-analysis the length of hospital stay was shorter after taTME than after laTME (MD=-0.86, 95%CI: -1.70 to -0.096, P=0.036). Moreover, the incidence of anastomotic leak was lower after taTME than after RTME (OR=0.60, 95%CI: 0.39 to 0.91, P=0.018). The incidence of intestinal obstruction was also lower after taTME than after RTME (OR=0.55, 95%CI: 0.31 to 0.94, P=0.037). All of these differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the three surgical procedures regarding the number of lymph nodes cleared, length of the inferior rectal margin, or rate of positive circumferential margins (all P>0.05). An inconsistency test using nodal analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between the results of direct and indirect comparisons of the six outcome indicators (all P>0.05). Furthermore, we detected no significant overall inconsistency between direct and indirect evidence. Conclusion: taTME has advantages over RTME and laTME, in terms of radical and surgical short-term outcomes in patients with rectal cancer.


Assuntos
Humanos , Robótica , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Metanálise em Rede , Estudos Retrospectivos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/métodos , Reto/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Saudi Medical Journal. 2014; 35 (9): 1150-1153
em Inglês | IMEMR | ID: emr-154790

RESUMO

To analyze strategies of operative management [OM] and non-operative management [NOM], mortality, and morbidity of hepatic trauma patients. We retrospectively reviewed 296 consecutive patients with hepatic trauma at the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, 101st Hospital of PLA, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China a single level one trauma center between January 2003 and December 2012. Data on demographics, mechanism of trauma, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade, initial management, and outcome were collected for this Study. A total of 101 [34%] patients were of low-grade, while 195 [66%] were of high-grade. Hepatic trauma with associated injury of other organs was noted in 205 [69.3%] patients. The initial management was OM for 119 [40.2%] and NOM for 177 [59.8%], 12 patients later required laparotomy. Surgical intervention included perihepatic packing in 6, liver parenchyma suturing in 29, liver parenchyma suturing and hemostasis in 50, segmental resection in 19, and right hepatectomy in 2. The overall mortality rate was 9.1%, and the mortality rate of 8.4% was due to hepatic injuries. All hemodynamically stable patients can be managed by NOM with excellent results, while high-grade hepatic injuries require OM due to hemodynamic instability, or concomitant injuries

3.
Chinese Journal of Cardiology ; (12): 155-158, 2007.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-304948

RESUMO

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To observe the relationship between abdominal obesity and left ventricular weight/function.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A total of 495 patients [265 males, mean age (55 +/- 12) years] with hypertension (139), diabetes (65), metabolic syndrome (285), diabetes complicated with hypertension (11) were enrolled in this study. Visceral adipose area (VA), the subcutaneous adipose (SA), the total abdominal adipose (TA) were measured by computerized tomography (CT) and left ventricular weight and function were obtained by echocardiography. Patients were divided into three groups according to the VA (I. VA<75 cm(2), n=173, II. VA>75 and < 110 cm(2), n=153, III. VA >or= 110 cm(2), n=169).</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Left ventricular mass (LVM) and LVM index (LVMI) increased and LVEF and E/A decreased in proportion to increasing VA. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) rate was significantly higher in group II and III compared to group I and LVEF was significantly reduced in group III compared to group I and II. There are significant correlation between LVMI and VA, SA, TA as well as between LVEF and VA after adjusting gender, age and blood pressure. Logistic regression analysis showed that VA is an independent predictor for LVH.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The abdominal adipose accumulation is closely related to the left ventricular weight and function.</p>


Assuntos
Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gordura Abdominal , Fisiologia , Diabetes Mellitus , Diagnóstico por Imagem , Hipertensão , Diagnóstico por Imagem , Pacientes Internados , Síndrome Metabólica , Diagnóstico por Imagem , Obesidade , Radiografia , Ultrassonografia , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Remodelação Ventricular
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA