Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 44(1): 81-85, Jan.-Feb. 2018. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-892946

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Objective To The standard technique for obtaining a histologic diagnosis of prostatic carcinomas is transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Acute prostatitis which might develop after prostate biopsy can cause periprostatic inflammation and fibrosis. In this study, we performed a retrospective review of our database to determine whether ABP history might affect the outcome of RP. Materials and Methods 441 RP patients who were operated in our clinic from 2002 to 2014 were included in our study group. All patients' demographic values, PSA levels, biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen pathology results and their perioperative/ postoperative complications were evaluated. Results There were 41 patients in patients with acute prostatitis following biopsy and 397 patients that did not develop acute prostatitis. Mean blood loss, transfusion rate and operation period were found to be significantly higher in ABP patients. Hospitalization period and reoperation rates were similar in both groups. However, post-op complications were significantly higher in ABP group. Conclusion Even though it does not affect oncological outcomes, we would like to warn the surgeons for potential complaints during surgery in ABP patients.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Prostatite/etiologia , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Prostatite/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Aguda , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
2.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(6): 1172-1177, Nov.-Dec. 2015. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-769770

RESUMO

Objectives: There is no trial comparing bipolar cautery and ligation for occlusion of vas in non-scalpel vasectomy. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of these vasectomy occlusion techniques. Materials and Methods: Between January 2002-June 2009, patients were allocated in alternate order. We recruited 100 cases in cautery group and 100 cases in ligation group. Non-scalpel approach was performed during vasectomy and fascial interposition was performed in all cases. First semen analysis was done 3 months after vasectomy. Vasectomy success was defined as azoospermia or non-motile sperm lower than 100.000/mL. Results: Four patients from the cautery group were switched to the ligation group due to technical problem of cautery device. Thus, data of 96 patients as cautery group and 104 patients as ligation group were evaluated. After vasectomy, semen analyses were obtained from 59 of 96 (61.5%) patients in cautery group and to 66 of 104 (63.5%) patients in ligation group. There was no statistical significant difference between the two groups in terms of the success of vasectomy (p=0.863). Conclusion: Although bipolar cautery technique is safe, effective and feasible in non-scalpel vasectomy, it has no superiority to ligation. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of the success and complications between the two groups.


Assuntos
Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cauterização/métodos , Vasectomia/métodos , Escolaridade , Ligadura/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Análise do Sêmen , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(5): 906-910, Sept.-Oct. 2015. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-767060

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Introduction: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the duration of prophylactic antibiotic administration in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy. Material and Methods: A total of 367 patients undergoing a prostate biopsy between September 2007 and June 2009 was reviewed retrospectively and divided into 2 groups according to prophilaxy: oral ciprofloxacin (750 mg every 12 hours) for 3 or more days in Group-1 and single day in Group-2. Demographic characteristics of patients, symptoms, PSA values, IPSS scores, prostate sizes, pathologic results and complications were compared between the groups. Results: The mean age of all patients was 63.92 years and the mean PSA was 13.61ng/ dL. The pre-biopsy mean IPSS score was 12.47 and mean prostate volume 52.53 mL. For 78.2% of patients the current biopsy was their first biopsy. Cancer detection rate was 24.2%. Fever was observed in 3 (1.2%) patients in Group-1 and 5 (4.0%) patients in Group-2. Local infections occurred in 2 (0.8%) and 1 (0.8%) patients respectively in Groups 1 and 2. Acute prostatitis was observed in only 1 (0.8%) patient in Group-2. Accepted after revision: None of the patients developed septicemia or other serious infection. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of fever, local infections (epididimitis, orchitis, etc.) and acute prostatitis. Conclusions: In a selected patient population single dose prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin can be safely administered compared to other regimens of 3 or more days. Increasing the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis does not decrease infectious complications.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Biópsia por Agulha/métodos , Ciprofloxacina/administração & dosagem , Próstata/patologia , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Biópsia por Agulha/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Prostatite/prevenção & controle , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(3): 442-448, May-June 2015. ilus
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-755864

RESUMO

ABSTRACTIntroduction:

Tumor diameter is a reliable parameter to estimate tumor volume in solid organ cancers; its use in prostate cancer is controversial since it exhibits a more irregular pattern of growth. This study aimed to examine the association between the tumor volume estimations based on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy results and the tumor volume measured on the pathological specimen.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 237 patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) were included in this retrospective study. The differences and correlations between cancer volume estimations based on TRUS guided biopsy findings and cancer volume estimations based on post-prostatectomy pathology specimens were examined. In addition, diagnostic value of TRUS guided biopsy-based volume estimations in order to predict clinically significant cancer (>0.5 cc) were calculated.

Results:

The mean cancer volume estimated using TRUS biopsy results was lower (5.5±6.5 cc) than the mean cancer volume calculated using prostatectomy specimens (6.4±7.6 cc) (p<0.041). TRUS guided biopsy examination resulted in 5 false positive and 15 false negative cases. There was a significant but weak correlation between the two parameters (r=0.62, p<0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of TRUS guided biopsy in predicting the presence of clinically significant cancer was 93.4% (95% CI, 89.1-96.1) and 50.0% (95% CI, 20.1-79.9), respectively.

Conclusions:

TRUS guided biopsy-derived estimations seem to have a limited value to predict pathologically established tumor volume. Further studies are warranted to identify additional methods that may more accurately predict actual pathological characteristics and prognosis of prostate cancer.

.


Assuntos
Adulto , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/métodos , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Carga Tumoral , Prognóstico , Próstata/cirurgia , Próstata , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Próstata , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA