Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University ; (12): 938-941, 2011.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-839964

RESUMO

To compare clinical outcomes of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and to identify the indicators for each approach. Methods A total of 258 patients underwent transperitoneal(n=116) or retroperitoneal (n=142) laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for RCC. The operation time, blood loss during operation, fasting period after surgery and hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Results The operation time was 80-315 min(a mean of [167±66.8] min) for transperitoneal approach and 85-280 min(a mean of [152± 48.8] min) for retroperitoneal approach (P=0.034). The blood loss was 50-1,000 ml (a mean of [181±140.4] ml) for transperitoneal approach and 50-800 ml(a mean of [171±132.9] ml) for retroperitoneal approach(P=0.544). The fasting period of surgery was 1-5 d (a mean of [2.8±1.3] d) for transperitoneal approach and 1-5 d (a mean of [2.9±1.2] d) for retroperitoneal approach(P=0.801). The hospital stay was 3-9 d (a mean of [6.6±1.5] d) for transperitoneal approach and 3-8 d (a mean of [6.5±1.6] d) for retroperitoneal approach(P = 0. 477). Conclusion Transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches both can yield satisfactory surgical outcomes in laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. The transperitoneal approach is suitable for tumors with a larger size.

2.
Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University ; (12): 938-941, 2011.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-839959

RESUMO

Objective To compare clinical outcomes of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and to identify the indicators for each approach. Methods A total of 258 patients underwent transperitoneal (n = 116) or retroperitoneal (n = 142) laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for RCC. The operation time, blood loss during operation, fasting period after surgery and hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Results The operation timewas 80-315 min (a mean of [167 ±66. 8] min) for transperitoneal approach and 85-280 min (a mean of [152± 48.8] min) for retroperitoneal approach (P = 0. 034). The blood loss was 50-1,000 ml (a mean of [181±140. 4] ml) for transperitoneal approach and 50-800 ml (a mean of [171 ± 132. 9] ml) for retroperitoneal approach(P = 0. 544). The fasting period of surgery was 1-5 d (a mean of [2. 8±1. 3] d) for transperitoneal approach and 1-5 d (a mean of [2. 9 ±1. 2] d) for retroperitoneal approach(P = 0. 801). The hospital stay was 3-9 d (a mean of [6. 6±1. 5] d) for transperitoneal approach and 3-8 d (a mean of [6. 5±1. 6] d) for retroperitoneal approach(P = 0. 477). Conclusion Transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches both can yield satisfactory surgical outcomes in laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. The transperitoneal approach is suitable for tumors with a larger size.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA