RESUMO
@#Introduction: Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients are often malnourished during diagnosis and before treatment. This study determined the prevalence of malnutrition and factors associated with malnutrition among HNC patients. Methods: A crosssectional study among HNC in-patients before radiotherapy was conducted. Malnutrition status of the patients was determined using scored Patient GeneratedSubjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA). Nutritional parameters of muscle mass, fat mass, albumin, energy and protein intakes were collected. Nutrition impact symptoms (NIS) of the patients were assessed using a validated Head and Neck Symptoms Checklist© (HNSC©). Results: Fifty HNC patients were recruited in this study and the age range of patients was 21 to 78 years old, with gender distribution of 78% males and 22% females. More than half of the patients were malnourished, with 20% severely malnourished before radiotherapy. The lack of dietitian referral before treatment was found to significantly affect nutritional status (p=0.027). There was a significant negative relationship between energy intake (r=0.342, p=0.015) and protein intake (r=0.386, p=0.006) with PG-SGA, indicating lower energy and protein intakes related with poor nutritional status. The result showed a significant positive relationship between NIS score (r=0.731, p<0.001) and PG-SGA, indicating the lower the NIS, the better the nutritional status among HNC patients. More than half of the HNC patients had difficulty chewing. Conclusion: A strong association between nutritional status and NIS showed the importance of dietary management in HNC patients. Early identification of the nutritional status of HNC patients can ensure optimal nutritional status to improve treatment outcomes.
RESUMO
@# Introduction: Malnutrition is a frequent complication in cancer patients and can negatively affect treatment outcome. Preliminary audit conducted at the Oncology Clinic, National Cancer Institute (NCI), found that only 5.8% of outpatients underwent nutrition screening using the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST), and only 2.6% of dietitian referrals were recorded. This audit aims to determine the rate of adherence to nutritional screening, and to implement remedial measures for improved patient care. Methods: This was a cross-sectional audit comprising three phases, namely initial audit, remedial measures and re-audit. Criteria audited include screening rate using MST and dietitian referral based on MST scores. Standards were set at 100% for both criteria. Data collected for initial audit were patients’ MST scores records and total dietitian referral forms retrieved from Electronic Medical Records. After initial audit, self-administered questionnaires for nurses and physicians were developed to identify barriers. Measures implemented for change included patientadministered MST to shorten screening time, and procedure flowchart to facilitate referral. After 6 months, a re-audit was conducted. Results: Total subjects for initial audit and re-audit were 349 and 390, respectively. Initial audit and re-audit showed screening rate using MST increased significantly from 6.3% to 79.5%, but there was no significant change for the dietitian referral rate. Conclusion: This clinical audit has led to a change in the policy in NCI outpatient clinics whereby nurses directly schedule dietitian referrals without going through physicians for patients with MST scores ≥2. Continuous audit and monitoring are necessary to facilitate improvement in MST implementation for better outpatient care.