Efficacy of rivastigmine on activities of daily living in Sri Lankan patients with Alzheimer disease and on improving caregiver burden: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: This open label, parallel group, prospective cohort study investigated the efficacy of rivastigmine treatment on activities of daily living (ADL) in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) and the possible benefits of this therapy on caregiver stress levels. METHODS: Thirty eight consecutive patients with mild to moderate AD were recruited; 22 received rivastigmine 3-6 mg twice daily (treatment group) for 20 weeks. Sixteen patients who did not receive rivastigmine served as the control group. The 17-item ADL Index was used to assess ADL and to determine the presence of functional deterioration. Caregivers were evaluated with the Caregiver Stress Scale (CSS). Each patient was required to have a committed caregiver and all caregivers were interviewed and administered the ADL Index and the Caregiver Stress Scale (CSS) at the start of treatment (week 0) and at the end of 20 weeks of treatment (week 20). RESULTS: Patients in the control group showed a significant decline in ADL Index score at 20 weeks compared to rivastigmine-treated patients (difference in mean ADL Index score = 8.5; p < 0.001). At week 20, mean change from baseline scores for CSS total and individual domain scores were better for caregivers in the treatment group than those in the control group (CSS total mean difference = 19.2). CONCLUSION: We conclude that treatment of AD patients with rivastigmine for 20 weeks produces a significant improvement in patient ADL functioning, and lower levels of caregiver stress.

Comparison of one week and two weeks of triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in a Sri Lankan population: a randomised, controlled study.

INTRODUCTION: Resistance of Helicobacter pylori to antibiotics may be particularly high in parts of the tropics. Infection may prove difficult to eradicate in such situations, and there is some evidence of benefit in increasing the duration of treatment (triple therapy) from 1 week to 2 or 3 weeks. AIM: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of 1 week versus 2 weeks of triple therapy for eradication of H. pylori in a Sri Lankan population. METHODS: Eighty two patients aged 18-70 years with gastritis or peptic ulcer and testing positive for H. pylori infection were randomly allocated to two treatment groups. Both groups received omeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 250 mg, and tinidazole 500 mg. Group A (n = 42) received the trial medication twice daily for 1 week and the Group B (n = 40) twice daily for 2 weeks. H. pylori eradication was defined as a negative 14C labelled urea breath test at 2 weeks after completion of the therapy. RESULTS: H. pylori infection was eradicated in 36 (85.7%) patients in Group A and 36 (90%) patients in Group B (p = 0.9). Twenty three (55%) patients in Group A and 17 (43%) in Group B reported adverse effects attributable to trial medication (p = 0.387); none were serious. Three (7.5%) patients in Group B discontinued treatment due to adverse events that developed on days 7, 9 and 10. CONCLUSION: Twice daily treatment with clarithromycin, tinidazole, and omeprazole for 1 week is well tolerated and provides as good a rate of H. pylori eradication as 2-week therapy in Sri Lankan patients.

Breast examination of older women in a teaching hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Breast examination during routine physical examination may help detect breast cancer and effect early treatment. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether doctors routinely perform breast examination in older women, and to assess attitudes of patients and doctors to this examination. METHODS: A questionnaire based survey of 150 women over 65 years attending a teaching hospital, and 51 doctors working in this hospital. RESULTS: Very few women had a breast examination performed by a doctor. All thought breast examination was important, and would give consent for this examination. Although the great majority of doctors thought breast examination should be done routinely only very few do so. CONCLUSION: Older women have a positive attitude towards breast examination, but this is not reflected by the practice of doctors. There is a need for change in attitudes and training among doctors so that breast examination would be performed routinely.