Tratamento da periimplantite por meio da descontaminação do implante: um relato de caso / Treatment of peri-implantitis through implant decontamination: a case report

Os implantes dentários osseointegrados representam uma parte da reabilitação oral, sendo uma alternativa cada vez mais utilizada na Odontologia a fim de substituir dentes perdidos. À semelhança das doenças periodontais, o fator etiológico das doenças periimplantares é o acúmulo de biofilme ao redor dos implantes dentários. Esta patologia também é classificada de acordo com os tecidos acometidos por ela, em mucosite e periimplantite. Para um correto tratamento e sucesso na terapia periimplantar, o diagnóstico deve ser baseado na sua etiologia e, seu tratamento segue variando de acordo com cada caso e estágio da doença. O presente trabalho tem como objetivo relatar o tratamento de um caso de periimplantite por meio da descontaminação da superfície do implante através de uma cirurgia de acesso. Paciente leucoderma, com 56 anos, sexo feminino, procurou atendimento no curso de graduação em Odontologia do centro Universitário da Serra Gaúcha ­ FSG, com queixa de sangramento/supuração, dor e edema na região dos dentes 15 e 16, reabilitados com implantes, e exposição de componentes protéticos. A paciente foi diagnosticada com periimplantite. O plano de tratamento proposto foi de promover a descontaminação da superfície do implante por meio de acesso cirúrgico. Com base no caso clínico apresentado, foi possível concluir que a técnica de tratamento utilizada foi eficaz para a resolução da periimplantite, no período de acompanhamento do estudo (90 dias), demonstrando melhora nos parâmetros clínicos e radiográficos(AU)

Osseointegrated dental implants represent a part of oral rehabilitation, being an increasingly used alternative in Dentistry in order to replace lost teeth. Similar to periodontal diseases, the etiological factor of peri-implant diseases is the accumulation of biofilm around dental implants. This pathology is also classified according to the tissues affected by it, in mucositis and peri-implantitis. For a correct treatment and success in peri-implant therapy, the diagnosis must be based on its etiology, and its treatment continues to vary according to each case and stage of the disease. The present work aims to report the treatment of a case of peri-implantitis through the decontamination of the implant surface through an access surgery. Caucasian female patient, 56 years old, sought care at the graduation course in Dentistry at Centro Universitário da Serra Gaúcha ­ FSG, complaining of bleeding/suppuration, pain and edema in the region of teeth 15 and 16, rehabilitated with implants, and exposure of prosthetic components. The patient was diagnosed with peri-implantitis. The proposed treatment plan was to promote decontamination of the implant surface through surgical access. Based on the presented clinical case, it was possible to conclude that the treatment technique used was effective for the resolution of periimplantitis, in the follow-up period of the study (90 days), demonstrating improvement in clinical and radiographic parameters(AU)

Serum TNF-α level and probing depth as a combined indicator for peri-implant disease

Peri-implant disease (PID) is a general term for inflammatory diseases of soft and hard tissues that occur around implants, including peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Cytokines are a class of small molecule proteins, which have various functions such as regulating innate immunity, adaptive immunity, and repairing damaged tissues. In order to explore the characteristics and clinical significance of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, and tumor growth factor (TGF)-β1 expression levels in serum of patients with peri-implant disease, 31 patients with PID and 31 patients without PID were enrolled. The modified plaque index (mPLI), modified sulcus bleeding index (mSBI), and peri-implant probing depth (PD) were recorded. The levels of serum TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, and TGF-β1 were detected by ELISA. TNF-α, mPLI, mSBI, and PD levels were significantly higher in the PID group. TGF-β1 levels were significantly higher in the control group. There was a significant positive correlation between TNF-α and mPLI, mSBI, and PD. TGF-β1 was negatively associated with TNF-α, mPLI, mSBI, and PD. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that TNF-α and PD were risk factors for the severity of PID. The receiver operating curve analysis showed that high TNF-α levels (cut-off value of 140 pg/mL) and greater PD values (cut-off value of 4 mm) were good predictors of PID severity with an area under the curve of 0.922. These results indicated that TNF-α and PD can be used as a biological indicator for diagnosing the occurrence and progression of PID.

Patient-, implant- and prosthetic-related factors on peri-implant mucositis and bone loss

Abstract Peri-implant diseases, including peri-implant mucositis (PIM) and peri-implantitis, are a chronic inflammatory disorder triggered by bacterial biofilm in susceptible hosts. Potential risk factors for peri-implant diseases include smoking, dental plaque accumulation, poor oral hygiene, genetics, and absence of peri-implant keratinized mucosa. This cohort study aimed to evaluate the influence of patient-, implant-, and prosthetic-related factors on PIM and peri-implant bone loss (PBL) around dental implants after 1 year of loading. A total of 54 subjects (22 males and 32 females) were included in the study. Peri-implant clinical parameters were assessed and standardized periapical radiographs of each dental implant were obtained 15 days after the definitive prosthesis installation (baseline) and at 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up. A total of 173 implants were evaluated. PIM affected 44.8% of the implants and no significant association was found between the investigated parameters and PIM incidence, except for type of implant connection. A significantly higher incidence of PIM (80.0%) was observed for implants with internal hexagon connection type after 1 year of follow-up (p = 0.015). Moreover, a mean PBL of 0.35 ± 1.89 mm was observed and no dental implant was affected by peri-implantitis after 1 year of function. No specific influence of patient, implant, or prosthetic factors on PBL was observed. No association was found between the occurrence of PIM/PBL and the patient-, implant-, and prosthetic-related factors investigated in this cohort study, except for the type of dental-implant connection.

Periimplantite e a importância do especialista em periodontia na manutenção dos tecidos / Periimplantitis and the importance of the periodontic specialist in tissue maintenance

Introdução: A peri-implantite é uma condição patológica associada a placa que ocorre nos tecidos de suporte ao redor de implantes dentários. Se caracteriza pela presença de sinais clínicos proveniente de inflamação na mucosa periimplantar conhecido como mucosite e subsequente perda progressiva do osso de suporte denominado como periimplatite. Objetivo: Classificar os principais sinais e sintomas clínicos da doença periimplantar a fim de estabelecer um diagnóstico, apresentar quais fatores devem ser avaliados durante o planejamento e manutenções de implantes dentários, os fatores de risco locais e sistêmicos, o tratamento e a importância do implantodontista com o periodontista realizar planejamento correto visando um prognostico favorável. Metodologia: Revisão de literatura foi realizada no PubMed, buscando artigos dos anos de 2010 a 2021. Resultado: Os estudos mostraram que o acúmulo de placa bacteriana nos implantes resultará no desenvolvimento de mucosite e podendo posteriormente se estabelecer a peri-implantite. Uma história de doença periodontal, tabagismo e falta de terapia de suporte devem ser considerados como indicadores de risco para o desenvolvimento de peri-implantite. Conclusão: É de suma importância o trabalho simultâneo do implantodontista com o periodontista com o intuito de se obter um bom planejamento e consequentemente reduzir danos a curto e longo prazo nos tecidos periimplantares. O sucesso do tratamento de doenças periimplantares está na prevenção, envolvendo reforço de higiene oral e manutenções periódicas(AU)

Introduction: A peri-implantitis is a plaqueassociated pathological condition that occurs in the supporting tissues around dental implants. If indifferent to the presence of proven clinical signs of inflammation in the peri-implant mucosa known as mucosite and subsequent progressive loss of supporting bone termed as peri-implatite. Objective: To classify the main signs and clinical signs of peri-implant disease an objective to establish a diagnosis, present the factors to be adopted during the planning and maintenance of dental implants, the local and systemic risk factors, the treatment and the importance of the implantodontist with the periodontist carrying out correct planning, a favorable prognosis. Methodology: A literature review was performed in PubMed, looking for articles from 2010 to 2021. Results: Advanced studies show that the accumulation of bacterial plaque in implants will result in the development of mucositis and may subsequently establish peri-implantitis. A history of periodontal disease, smoking and lack of supportive therapy should be considered as risk indicators for the development of peri-implantitis. Conclusion: The simultaneous work of the implantodontist with the periodontist is of paramount importance in order to obtain a good planning and consequently reduce short and long-term damage to the peri-implant tissues. The successful treatment of peri-implant diseases lies in prevention, involving reinforcement of oral hygiene and periodic maintenance(AU)

Effectiveness of ozone therapy in the treatment of periodontal diseases: a systematic review / Eficácia da ozonioterapia no tratamento de doenças periodontais: uma revisão sistemática

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of ozone as an adjuvant factor in the treatment of periodontal diseases. A systematic review was carried out using the PubMed, LILACS/BIREME, CoChrane, and Scielo databases and manual searches. Clinical studies published in English, Spanish, Portuguese, and French, between 1950 and 2020 that evaluated the effects of ozone in the treatment of periodontal diseases were included. The search resulted in 178 articles, of which 24 met the proposed eligibility criteria and were selected for this review. The risk of bias was assessed for each selected study in accordance with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool - version 5.1.0. The selected studies evaluated the effect of ozone therapy on periodontitis, gingivitis, and peri-implant diseases. It was observed that the ozone in its oily form presented the best clinical results. In cases of periodontitis, it was concluded that ozone therapy in the gaseous form did not bring any additional benefit. With respect to gingivitis, ozone provided faster remission compared to the control group. And in peri-implant disease cases, ozone had the capacity to reduce the development of mucositis. Regarding microbiology, it was observed that ozone can continuously and significantly reduce periodontal microorganisms; however, with no difference from control groups. Further studies with adequate control of biases are suggested, using ozone in the oily or aqueous form, which are the most promising forms, also evaluating the possible effectiveness of ozone by-products.

RESUMO O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a eficácia do uso do ozônio como fator adjuvante no tratamento das doenças periodontais. Foi realizada uma revisão sistemática utilizando as bases de dados PubMed, LILACS/BIREME, CoChrane, Scielo e pesquisa manual. Foram incluídos estudos clínicos publicados em inglês, espanhol, português e francês entre 1950 e 2020, que avaliaram os efeitos do ozônio no tratamento de doenças periodontais. A busca resultou em 178 artigos, destes 24 estudos atenderam aos critérios de elegibilidade propostos e foram selecionados para esta revisão. Foi realizada a avaliação do risco de viés em cada estudo selecionado de acordo com a ferramenta de avaliação de risco de viés Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool - versão 5.1.0. Os estudos selecionados avaliaram o efeito da ozonioterapia na periodontite, gengivite e em doenças peri-implantares. Observou-se que a utilização do ozônio na forma oleosa foi a que apresentou os melhores resultados clínicos. Nos casos de periodontite, concluiu-se que a ozonioterapia não trouxe nenhum benefício adicional sob a forma gasosa. Em relação à gengivite, o ozônio proporcionou uma remissão mais rápida do que do grupo controle. E nas doenças peri-implantares, o ozônio foi capaz de reduzir o desenvolvimento da mucosite. Com relação a microbiologia, foi observado que o ozônio pode reduzir contínua e significativamente os microorganismos periodontais, contudo, sem diferença para grupos controle. Sugerem-se mais estudos com controle adequado de vieses, utilizando o ozônio de forma oleosa ou aquosa, formas mais promissoras, além da avaliação de possível eficácia de subprodutos do ozônio.

Avaliação do efeito antimicrobiano em parafuso protético de implantes revestido com filme de carbono tipo diamante dopados com prata depositado por plasma / Evaluation of antimicrobial action in prosthetic screws of implants with diamond-like carbon films doped with plasma deposited silver

Apesar da confiabilidade, as falhas mecânicas e biológicas das reabilitações protéticas sobre implantes ainda são persistentes. A capacidade altamente adaptativa das bactérias e sua colonização na superfície dos implantes e componentes protéticos ainda hoje é um sério problema clínico, causando mucosite e peri-implantite. O objetivo do trabalho foi avaliar o efeito antimicrobiano do fino filmes de carbono tipo diamante (DLC) dopado com nanopartículas de prata, depositado nos parafusos protéticos. Os filmes de DLC e DLC-Ag foram depositados pelo processo conhecido como PECVD (Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapour Deposition). A caracterização do material foi realizada em discos da liga Ti6Al4V pelas análises scratch test, espectroscopia de espalhamento Raman, perfilometria mecânica, goniometria e espectroscopia de energia dispersiva (EDS). A atividade antimicrobiana foi avaliada utilizando uma cepa padrão de Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212). Para avaliar a efetividade dos filmes depositados, foram realizados ensaios nos discos e nos parafusos (isolados e no modelo implante/pilar). Foram utilizados implantes hexágono externo de plataforma regular 4,1 mm com os respectivos pilares. Para todas as análises, as amostras foram divididas em 3 grupos de acordo com o tipo de tratamento: Grupo controle (sem tratamento); Grupo DLC, amostras revestidas com filme de DLC, Grupo DLC-Ag, amostras revestidas com filme de DLC com prata. As amostras foram analisadas por MEV. Também foi avaliada a citotoxicidade dos filmes frente a células de fibroblastos (3T3) através do ensaio de MTT. A caracterização dos filmes por espectroscopia de espalhamento raman e EDS, apresentaram resultados característicos ao DLC e DLC-Ag, como uma distribuição homogênea de carbono, prata e silício. As análises de scratch test, perfilometria mecânica e goniometria, apresentaram filmes com características hidrofóbicas, sendo DLC-Ag o grupo de maior rugosidade e coeficiente de atrito. Os dados obtidos foram analisados estatisticamente com auxílio do programa GraphPad Prism versão 9.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) e realizado os testes ANOVA e de Tukey para comparações entre os grupos (discos), e os testes Kruskal-Wallis e post-hoc de Dunn (parafusos). O nível de significância para todos os testes foi estabelecido em 5%. Os resultados demonstraram que a deposição do filme de DLC e DLC-Ag apresentaram redução de maneira significativa (p<0,05) na contagem de UFC/ml nos discos e parafusos isolados. Porém a dopagem com prata não trouxe um resultado superior ao filme DLC e ambos os materiais se apresentaram como não citotóxico. Concluímos que o revestimento com DLC e DLC-Ag é um material promissor, com efeito antimicrobiano, porém com limitação de aplicação (AU)

Despite the reliability, the mechanical and biological failures in rehabilitating implantsupported dental are still persistent. Mucositis and peri-implantitis are still severe clinical problems due to the high adaptive capacity of bacteria that colonize the surface of implants and prosthetic components. The present study aimed to evaluate, in vitro, the antimicrobial action of thin films of diamond-like carbon (DLC) doped with silver nanoparticles, deposited on prosthetic screws. The deposition of the films was performed by PECVD (Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition). The characterizations were performed of both deposited samples and control (Ti6Al4V) by scratch test analysis, raman scattering spectroscopy, mechanical profilometry, goniometry, and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). The antimicrobial was evaluated activity against Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212). To evaluate the effectiveness of the deposited films, tests were performed on disks and screws (isolated and on the implant/abutment model) Using 30 regular platforms with 4.1 mm external hexagon implants with the respective abutments, distributed into 3 groups according to the type of prosthetic screw treatment (n=10): Group control screw (no treatment); Group screw coated with DLC film, Group screw coated with DLC film doped with silver nanoparticles (Ag-DLC). The samples were also analyzed by SEM The cytotoxicity of the films against (3T3) fibroblast cells was also assessed using the MTT assay. The caracterization was performed from raman spectroscopy and EDS, showed results which are characteristics of DLC and Ag-DLC films, such as a homogeneous distribution of carbon, silver and silicon. The scratch test, mechanical profilometry and goniometry analyzes showed films with hydrophobic characteristics, with Ag-DLC being the group with the higher coefficient of friction values and roughness Data were statistically analyzed using GraphPad Prism version 9.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). ANOVA and Tukey tests were performed, followed by comparisons between groups (disks) and Kruskal-Walis and post-hoc Dunn (screw) tests The significance level for all tests was set at 5%. The results demonstrated that the deposition of the DLC and Ag-DLC film showed a significant reduction (p<0.05) in the CFU/ml count compared to the contro, disks and isolated screwl. However, silver doping did not enhance the DLC films; both materials were non-cytotoxic. It concludes that titanium alloys coated with DLC and Ag-DLC are promising materials with antibacterial properties to prevent peri-implantitis (AU)

PHOTOBIOMODULATION IN DENTAL IMPLANT THERAPY: A REVIEW

Photobiomodulation (PBM) or formerly known as low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is nothing but low-dosage biophotonics for therapy which presents an advancing new era of regenerative modalities in dental implantology. It utilizes light emitting diodes (LEDs), broad light sources and lasers for this purpose. Photobiomodulation is intended for relieving pain and inflammation, regulating immune responses as well as stimulating wound healing and tissue regeneration. This helps in combatting the main pathological causes of implant failures that are, peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis as well as helps promote osseointegration and improve stability of implants. While the scope of photobiomodulation has been thoroughly investigated in in-vitro and animal studies, human clinical trials are still scarce which makes appropriate protocol formation with respect to dosage and mode of delivery among other parameters difficult. A recently introduced and potential application of photobiomodulation in the field of implantology aims to deliver the positive effects of biophotonics through in-situ ambulatory PBM therapy called the smart dental implant (SDI) system. This comprehensive review presents the current and future trends in the application of photobiomodulation in the field of dental implantology.

Emerging titanium surface modifications: The war against polymicrobial infections on dental implants

Abstract Dental implants made of titanium (Ti) material is recognized as the leading treatment option for edentulous patients' rehabilitation, showing a high success rate and clinical longevity. However, dental implant surface acts as a platform for microbial adhesion and accumulation once exposed to the oral cavity. Biofilm formation on implant surfaces has been considered the main etiologic factor to induce inflammatory diseases, known as peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis; the latter being recognized as the key reason for late dental implant failure. Different factors, such as biofilm matrix production, source of carbohydrate exposure, and cross-kingdom interactions, have encouraged increased microbial accumulation on dental implants, leading to a microbiological community shift from a healthy to a pathogenic state, increasing inflammation and favoring tissue damage. These factors combined with the spatial organization of biofilms, reduced antimicrobial susceptibility, complex microbiological composition, and the irregular topography of implants hamper biofilm control and microbial killing. In spite of the well-known etiology, there is still no consensus regarding the best clinical protocol to control microbial accumulation on dental implant surfaces and treat peri-implant disease. In this sense, different coatings and Ti surface treatments have been proposed in order to reduce microbial loads and control polymicrobial infections on implantable devices. Therefore, this critical review aims to discuss the current evidence on biofilm accumulation on dental implants and central factors related to the pathogenesis process of implant-related infections. Moreover, the potential surface modifications with anti-biofilm properties for dental implant devices is discussed to shed light on further promising strategies to control peri-implantitis.

Resumo Implantes dentários em titânio (Ti) são reconhecidos como principal modalidade terapêutica para a reabilitação oral de pacientes edêntulos, demonstrando uma alta taxa de sucesso e longevidade clínica. No entanto, após inserção no ambiente bucal, os implantes dentários agem como substrato para adesão e acúmulo microbiano. A formação de biofilmes em implantes dentários tem sido considerada o principal fator etiológico para induzir doenças inflamatórias conhecidas como mucosite peri-implantar e peri-implantite, sendo está última reconhecida como principal razão para falha tardia dos implantes dentários. Diferentes fatores têm sido atribuídos por promover o acúmulo microbiano em implantes dentários, levando a uma mudança microbiológica e favorecendo o dano tecidual, como a matriz do biofilme, exposição a carboidratos e interação entre reinos. Esses fatores combinados com a organização espacial de biofilmes, reduzida suscetibilidade microbiana, complexa composição microbiológica e a superfície irregular dos implantes dificultam o controle do biofilme e a morte microbiana. Apesar da etiologia bem conhecida, ainda não há consenso sobre o melhor protocolo clínico para controlar o acúmulo microbiano nas superfícies dos implantes dentários e tratar a doença peri-implantar. Nesse sentido, diferentes coberturas e tratamentos de superfície no Ti têm sido desenvolvidos objetivando a redução dos níveis microbianos e o controle das infecções polimicrobianas em implantes. Portanto, essa revisão crítica objetiva discutir a atual evidência em relação ao acúmulo de biofilmes em implantes dentários e fatores chave relacionados ao processo patogênico das infecções peri-implantares. Além disso, o potencial de alterações de superfícies com propriedades antimicrobianas para implantes dentários é discutido para ressaltar futuras estratégias promissoras no controle da peri-implantite.

Efficacy of combined application of glycine powder air-polishing in non-surgical treatment of peri-implant diseases / 北京大学学报(医学版)

OBJECTIVE@#To compare the clinical efficacy of combined application of glycine powder air-polishing and mechanical submucosal debridement in non-surgical treatment of peri-implant diseases.@*METHODS@#A randomized controlled clinical study was carried out on patients diagnosed with peri-implant diseases in the Department of Periodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, between May of 2020 and June of 2021.Twenty-eight patients with totally sixty-two implants were enrolled.The patients were randomly divided into the test group and control group. The patients in the test group (13 subjects/32 implants) received mechanical submucosal debridement using titanium curettes combined with application of glycine powder air-polishing, while the control group (15 subjects/30 implants) received mechanical submucosal debridement using titanium only. Clinical parameters, such as plaque index (PLI), pocket probing depth (PPD), bleeding index (BI) and the percentage of suppuration on probing on implants' level (SoP%) were measured at baseline and 8 weeks after non-surgical intervention. Changes and group differences of clinical parameters of the implants before and 8 weeks after non-surgical intervention were compared.@*RESULTS@#Mean PLI, PPD, BI of both the test group and control group significantly reduced 8 weeks after non-surgical intervention (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the test group achieved lower BI (2.7±0.8 vs. 2.2±0.7, P < 0.05), more reduction of BI (0.6±0.7 vs. 1.1±0.6, P < 0.01) and more reduction of SoP% (21.9% vs. 10%, P < 0.05) after non-surgical intervention. Both the control and test groups exhibited comparable PLI and PPD reductions (P>0.05). For the implants diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis, the test group revealed more signi-ficant reduction in BI and SoP% than the control group (1.0±0.7 vs. 0.4±0.7, P=0.02; 6.3% vs. 0, P=0.012). There was no significant difference existing in PLI and PD improvement between the control group and test group (P>0.05). For the implants diagnosed with peri-implantitis, there was no significant difference existing in PLI, PPD, BI and SoP% improvement values between the test and control groups (P>0.05). No complications or discomforts were reported during the study.@*CONCLUSION@#Both treatment procedures could relieve the inflammation of peri-implant soft tissue. Non-surgical mechanical submucosal debridement combined application of glycine powder air-polishing is associated with significant reduction of soft tissue bleeding and suppuration on probing especially in the implants diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis.

Application of video education combined with Teach-back in implant restoration treatment of patients with chronic periodontitis / 中国实用护理杂志

Objective:To explore the application effect of video education combined with Teach-back in the treatment of patients with chronic periodontitis.Methods:Using non-simultaneous experimental research methods, From January to August in 2019, 41 patients with chronic periodontitis who underwent implant restoration in Shanghai Tenth People′s Hospital was selected by convenience sampling method as the control group, and implemented routine oral health education. From September 2019 to May 2020, 42 patients with chronic periodontitis who underwent implant restoration in Shanghai Tenth People′s Hospital were the observation group, and implemented video education combined with Teach-back. Compare the two groups of oral health care self-efficacy, periodontal clinical indicators, and the incidence of peri-implant mucositis.Results:Comparing 6 months and 12 months after implant restoration, the total scores of oral health self-efficacy and regular oral visits, correct brushing, and balanced diet in the observation group were 66.31 ± 4.32 and 67.19 ± 4.65, 22.04 ± 1.35 and 21.69 ± 1.82, 21.73 ± 1.65 and 22.64 ± 1.82, 22.54 ± 1.62 and 22.86 ± 1.74 respectively, which were higher than the control group 53.93 ± 4.78 and 54.09 ± 5.67, 17.02 ± 2.58 and 17.43 ± 2.16, 17.65 ± 1.74 and 18.54 ± 2.36, 19.14 ± 2.13 and 18.12 ± 2.58, the difference between the two groups at the two time points were statistically significant ( t values were 6.52-12.39, all P<0.05). And the PLI, mSBI, and PIS scores of the observation group were 0.80 ± 0.17 and 0.75 ± 0.14, 0.79 ± 0.19 and 0.81 ± 0.18, 2.08 ± 0.45 and 2.10 ± 0.53, respectively, which were lower than the control group 0.92 ± 0.19 and 0.99 ± 0.21, 1.03 ± 0.17 and 1.16 ± 0.21, 2.45 ± 0.68 and 2.62 ± 0.61, the difference between the two groups at the two time points were statistically significant ( t values were 2.93-8.16, all P<0.05). 12 months after, the incidence of mucositis around implants in the observation group was 7.14%(3/42), which was lower than 26.83%(11/41)in the control group ( χ2=5.73, P<0.05). Conclusions:Video education combined with Teach-back can improve the self-efficacy of oral health care during implant restoration treatment in patients with chronic periodontitis, improve oral health care behavior, thereby improving the periodontal condition around the implant and reducing the incidence of mucositis.

Mucositis periimplantaria asociada a ortodoncia correctiva / Peri-implant mucositis associated to corrective orthodontics

Introducción: Los minitornillos de ortodoncia son dispositivos temporales de anclaje utilizados ampliamente en ortodoncia correctiva. Sin embargo, se ha reportado en la literatura que su tasa clínica de éxito no es completa debido a que pueden existir fallas relacionadas con la pérdida de su estabilidad. Varios factores pueden comprometer el anclaje y están relacionados con el tipo de implante, su manejo quirúrgico y el hospedero. Dentro de este último, se encuentra la inflamación del tejido periimplantario o mucositis que, aunque reversible, es necesario su tratamiento temprano para evitar su progresión a la afectación de tejido duro (periimplantitis). Objetivo: Describir un caso clínico de mucositis periimplantaria asociada a un dispositivo de anclaje ortodóntico temporal. Presentación del caso: Paciente femenina que acudió a la consulta por presentar dolor en la zona anterior del maxilar superior. Durante el examen intraoral se observó que usaba aparatos de ortodoncia con mecanismo de anclaje: dos minitornillos de ortodoncia ubicados al nivel de los caninos superiores. Se realizó la remoción quirúrgica de los minitornillos de ortodoncia, se le indicó el uso de antibióticos y se realizó estudio histopatológico para descartar malignidad. Se diagnosticó con mucositis periimplantaria. Conclusiones: La remoción quirúrgica de los minitornillos de ortodoncia es una excelente alternativa para evitar la progresión de la lesión hacia los tejidos duros. A través de esta técnica lograron eliminar signos de dolor, enrojecimiento y sangrado(AU)

Introduction: Orthodontic miniscrews are temporary anchorage devices widely used in corrective orthodontics. However, it has been reported in the literature that their clinical success rate is not high, due to failures related to the loss of stability. Anchorage may be affected by factors associated to the type of implant, its surgical management and the host. Host-related factors include peri-implant tissue inflammation or mucositis, which though reversible, its early treatment is necessary to prevent expansion into and damage to the hard tissue (peri-implantitis). Objective: Describe a clinical case of peri-implant mucositis associated to a temporary orthodontic anchorage device. Case presentation: A female patient attends clinical consultation with pain in the anterior zone of her upper maxilla. Intraoral examination revealed the presence of orthodontic appliances with an anchorage mechanism: two orthodontic miniscrews located at the level of the upper canines. Surgical removal was performed of the orthodontic miniscrews, antibiotics were indicated and histopathological testing was conducted to rule out malignancy. The patient was diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis. Conclusions: Surgical removal of orthodontic miniscrews is an excellent alternative to prevent the progress of the lesion into hard tissues. Pain signs, reddening and bleeding were all eliminated with the technique applied(AU)

Peri-implant health after supportive mucositis therapy is associated with increased levels of FGF-2

Abstract This study aimed to analyze Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 (FGF-2) levels in the peri-implant crevicular fluid throughout supportive mucositis therapy. Twenty-six participants with Branemark protocol prosthesis were divided into two groups: the control group, characterized by healthy peri-implants, and the mucositis group, presenting a diagnosis of peri-implant mucositis. All participants underwent clinical examination, radiographic analysis, prosthesis removal, and non-invasive peri-implant therapy (mechanical debridement associated with chlorhexidine 0.12%) during a period of 36 days divided into three intervals. Peri-implant crevicular fluid samples were collected at each interval in order to analyze FGF-2 levels by immuno-enzymatic assay. The control and mucositis groups showed difference in keratinized mucosa. The smaller the range of keratinized mucosa the higher susceptibility of peri-implant mucositis. Throughout the treatment intervals, participants were diagnosed in different groups indicating whether or not the non-invasive therapy was able to treat peri-implant mucositis. There was a significant difference of FGF-2 levels between groups, with the higher FGF-2 levels in the control group (p=0.01). After supportive therapy, the mucositis group showed significantly increased FGF-2 levels (p<0.01) compared to initial levels. After 36 days of supportive therapy, there was a reduction of peri-implant mucositis from 70% to 23%. Clinical and laboratory outcomes showed a clear correlation since FGF-2 levels increased after 36 days. It was concluded that the therapy protocol was effective and promoted a regenerative reaction and FGF-2 can be considered a future target for peri-implant mucositis understanding.

Resumo Este estudo teve como objetivo analisar os níveis de FGF-2 no fluido crevicular peri-implantar durante a terapia de suporte da mucosite. Vinte e seis participantes com prótese protocolo Branemark foram divididos em dois grupos: o grupo controle, caracterizado por saúde peri-implanter, e o grupo mucosite, apresentando diagnóstico de mucosite peri-implantar. Todos os participantes foram submetidos a exame clínico, análise radiográfica, retirada da prótese e terapia não invasiva peri-implantar (debridamento mecânico associado à clorexidina 0,12%) durante um período de 36 dias, dividido em três intervalos. Amostras de fluido crevicular peri-implantar foram coletadas em cada intervalo para análise dos níveis de FGF-2, por ensaio imunoenzimático. Os grupos controle e mucosite não apresentaram diferença nos parâmetros clínicos, exceto para mucosa queratinizada. Ao longo dos intervalos de tratamento, os participantes foram diagnosticados em diferentes grupos, indicando se a terapia não invasiva era ou não capaz de tratar a mucosite peri-implantar. Houve diferença significativa dos níveis de FGF-2 entre os grupos, sendo os níveis de FGF-2 maiores no grupo controle (p = 0.01). Após a terapia de suporte, o grupo com mucosite apresentou níveis de FGF-2 significativamente aumentados (p <0.01) em comparação aos níveis iniciais. Após 36 dias de terapia de suporte, houve redução da mucosite peri-implantar de 70% para 23%. Os resultados clínicos e laboratoriais mostraram uma correlação clara, uma vez que os níveis de FGF-2 aumentaram após 36 dias. O protocolo de terapia foi eficaz e promoveu uma reação regenerativa. O FGF-2 pode ser considerado um alvo futuro para o tratamento da mucosite peri-implantar.

Enfermedades perimplantarias: realidades y consecuencias / Peri-implantar diseases: realities and consequences

Introducción: La utilización de implantes dentales como método para reemplazar dientes perdidos ha demostrado ser un tratamiento con una tasa de éxito superior a 89 % en periodos de observación entre 10-15 años; no obstante, el número de implantes continúa incrementándose y, con ello, la prevalencia de enfermedades perimplantarias. Objetivo: Profundizar los conocimientos sobre la enfermedad perimplantaria y los tratamientos existentes. Desarrollo: Como resultado del avance en la rehabilitación, el uso de implantes dentales ha tomado un gran auge en los últimos años y, en particular, en la provincia de Santiago de Cuba; sin embargo, con el uso de esta técnica también se han incremento las complicaciones y los fracasos por múltiples razones. Conclusiones: La enfermedad perimplantaria representa un problema de salud con incidencia creciente, que requiere de un enfoque multidisciplinario, lo que depende de varios principios biológicos que es preciso respetar, tales como el diagnóstico, el plan terapéutico, la ejecución cuidadosa del proceder, el seguimiento posoperatorio y la carga apropiada del implante, que son factores importantes para lograr el resultado deseado.

Introduction: The use of dental implant as method to replace lost teeth has demonstrated to be a treatment with a success rate higher than 89 % in periods of observation between 10-15 years; nevertheless, the number of implants is still increasing and, with it, the prevalence of peri-implantar diseases. Objective: To deepen the knowledge on the peri-implantar disease and the existing treatments. Development: As a result of the advance in rehabilitation, the use of dental implants has taken a great boom in the last years and, in particular, in the province of Santiago de Cuba; however, with the use of this technique the complications and failures have also increased due to multiple reasons. Conclusions: The peri-implantar disease represents a health problem with growing incidence that requires a multidisciplinary approach, what depends on several biological principles that is necessary to respect, such as the diagnosis, the therapeutic plan, the careful implementation of the procedure, the postoperative follow up and the appropriate load of the implant that are important factors to achieve the result desired.

Reabilitação implantossuportada pela técnica "All on four" após periimplantite mandibular: relato de caso / Implant rehabilitation supported by the "All on four" technique after mandibular periimplantitis: case report

Com o avanço da odontologia, os implantes dentários tornaram-se cada vez mais atrativos por oferecerem um melhor conforto, estética e função mastigatória. Todavia, com o aumento da sua utilização também surgiram os problemas, dentre eles a periimplantite. Vista como uma doença irreversível de caráter inflamatório, ela afeta os tecidos ao seu redor, levando à perda. No contexto da Implantodontia, os implantes dentários são afetados pela periimplantite - quando instalada - o que induz à destruição dos tecidos de suporte e proteção adjacentes, ocasionando também a perda destas reabilitações. Portanto, novas reabilitações devem ser planejadas para que possam corrigir os defeitos causados pela doença. Dentre as opções, a técnica "All on four" apresenta-se como vantajosa, po dendo ser escolhida para grandes reabilitações. Logo, o presente artigo tem o objetivo de descrever um caso clínico utilizando a técnica "all on four" que reabilitou um paciente edêntulo em mandíbula, na qual possuía implantes afetados pela periimplantite, optando-se pela remoção e nova instalação de 4 implantes pela técnica escolhida. Após 4 meses, foi realizada a instalação da prótese definitiva... (AU)

With the advancement of dentistry, dental implants have become increasingly attractive as they offer bet ter comfort, aesthetics and masticatory function. However, with the increase in its use, problems also arose, among them the peri-implantitis disease. Seen as an irreversible disease with an inflammatory character, it affects the tissues around it, leading to loss. In the context of Implantology, dental implants are affected by peri-implantitis - when installed - which induces the destruction of adjacent support and protective tissues, also causing the loss of these rehabilitations. Therefore, new rehabilitation must be planned so that they can correct the defects caused by the disease. Among the options, the "All on four" technique presents itself as an advantage and can be chosen for major rehabilitation. Therefore, the present article aims to describe a clinical case using the "all on four" technique that rehabilitated an edentulous patient in the mandible, in which he had implants affected by peri-implantitis, opting for the removal and new installation of 4 implants by the technique chosen. After 4 months, the definitive prosthesis was installed... (AU)

Tratamento de mucosite periimplantar pela técnica de enxerto gengival livre: relato de caso / Treatment of peri-implant mucositis through free gingival graft technique: case report

A Mucosite peri-implantar é considerada a precursora da peri-implantite, ela é uma lesão inflamatória da mucosa peri-implantar na ausência de perda óssea marginal contínua. O objetivo desse relato de caso, foi descrever o tratamento da mucosite periimplantar através da cirurgia de enxerto gengival livre. Foi proposto, portanto, um tratamento reabilitador envolvendo uma abordagem multidisciplinar de forma a resgatar e restabelecer estética, função e bem-estar através do enxerto gengival livre para melhorar as características de mucosa e viabilizar uma previsibilidade de uma prótese definitiva implantosuportada em condições teciduais mais estáveis. O uso do EGL para aumento da gengiva queratinizada na cirurgia de implantes em paciente idosos é uma solução prática e segura para a manutenção da saúde periodontal ao redor do implante... (AU)

Peri-implant mucositis is considered the precursor of peri-implantitis, it is an inflammatory lesion of the peri-implant mucosa in the absence of continuous marginal bone loss. The purpose of this case report was to describe the treatment of peri-implant mucositis through free gingival graft surgery. Therefore, a rehabilitation treatment involving a multidisciplinary approach was proposed in order to rescue and reestablish aesthetics, function and well-being through the free gingival graft to improve the characteristics of the mucosa and enable a predictability of a permanent implant prosthesis under more stable tissue conditions. The use of EGL to increase keratinized gingiva in implant surgery in elderly patients is a practical and safe solution for maintaining periodontal health around the implant... (AU)

Etiologia e tratamento das periimplantites: revisão integrativa / Etiology and treatment of periimplantites: integrative review

Atualmente, o número de dentes perdidos por pessoa tem diminuído, e ainda, os meios para reparar essas perdas têm sido mais rápidos e confortáveis, como é o caso dos implantes dentários. No entanto, algumas complicações podem ocorrer associadas a esses procedimentos, podendo levar a perda dos implantes dentários. O objetivo deste trabalho foi realizar uma revisão integrativa da literatura acerca da etiologia e dos tratamentos utilizados para a periimplantite. Para isto, foi realizada uma busca nas bases de dados BVS, Cochrane Central e PUBMED, utilizando os descritores: "dental implants" e "periimplantitis". Foram encontrados inicialmente 1348 artigos. Após a leitura dos títulos e resumos, foi realizada a remoção das duplicatas e, posteriormente, foram analisados os critérios de elegibilidade, sendo excluídos artigos que tratavam de estudos em animais e aqueles com mais de dez anos de publicação, com base nesses critérios foram selecionados 34 artigos. Foi realizada a leitura completa dos artigos selecionados e as informações sobre etiologia e tratamento foram inseridas em uma tabela. Os principais fatores relacionados a etiologia da periimplantite foram a mucosite periimplantar, tabagismo, doenças sistêmicas, hiperglicemia, presença dos mesmos fatores biológicos e bacterianos da periodontite, falta de descontaminação da superfície do implante, origem infecciosa ocasionada pela negligência na higiene oral, implantes inseridos imediatamente após a extração, entre outras. Quanto ao tratamento, se pode listar uma grande quantidade, dentre eles: o tratamento de mucosite, a terapia periodontal básica, os grânulos de titânio poroso, o mineral ósseo bovino com membrana de colágeno, a terapia foto dinâmica, o tratamento cirúrgico, o uso de antibióticos, as nanopartículas, os lasers, entre outros. Com base nesses achados, é necessário o conhecimento dos fatores etiológicos das periimplantites para que haja sucesso no tratamento e evite a perda dos implantes dentários... (AU)

Currently, the number of teeth lost per person has decreased, and yet, the means to repair these losses have been faster and more comfortable, as is the case with dental implants. However, some complications can occur associated with these procedures, which can lead to the loss of dental implants. The objective of this work was to carry out a integrative review of the literature about the etiology and treatments used for periimplantitis. For this, a search was carried out in the VHL, Cochrane Central and PUBMED databases, using the descriptors: "dental implants" and "periimplantitis". 1348 articles were initially found. After reading the titles and abstracts, the duplicates were removed and, subsequently, the eligibility criteria were analyzed, articles that dealt with animal studies were excluded and those with more than ten years of publication were selected based on these criteria. 34 articles. A complete reading of the selected articles was carried out and the information on etiology and treatment was inserted in a table. The main factors related to the etiology of periimplantitis were periimplant mucositis, smoking, systemic diseases, hyperglycemia, presence of the same biological and bacterial factors as periodontitis, lack of decontamination of the implant surface, infectious origin caused by negligence in oral hygiene, implants inserted immediately after extraction, among others. As for treatment, a large number can be listed, among them: mucositis treatment, basic periodontal therapy, porous titanium granules, bovine bone mineral with collagen membrane, photodynamic therapy, surgical treatment, the use of antibiotics, nanoparticles, lasers, among others. Based on these findings, it is necessary to know the etiologicl factors of periimplantitis in order for treatment to be successful and prevent the loss of dental implants... (AU)

The Effect of Periodontal and Peri-Implanter Health on IL-1 and TNF- Levels in Gingival Crevicular and Peri-Implanter Sulcus Fluid: a Cross-Sectional Study / El efecto de la salud periodontal y peri-implantar en niveles de IL-1ß y TNF-α en el fluido crevicular y sulcus peri-implantador: un estudio transversal

Abstract: It is stated that peri-implanter diseases have destructive effects similar to periodontal diseases. This study aims to compare IL-1β and TNF-α levels in healthy and diseased areas. Forty non-smokers systemically health individuals (40 implants/40 teeth) (age:38-67) were included in the study. In clinical and radiographic examinations; plaque index (PIn), gingival index (GI), periodontal pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL) and marginal bone loss (MBL) values were recorded. The gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and peri-implanter sulcus fluids (PISF) of the patients were collected, and IL-1β and TNF-α levels were measured by ELISA in the samples. The collected data were analyzed with the help of SPSS v.22 package program. Sample PPD score showed a statistically significant difference between the diseased and healthy groups and also sample CAL showed statistically significant higher in Periodontitis(P) compared to periodontally heathy(H) and Gingivitis(G) (p>0.05). IL-1beta and TNF-α levels in GCF/PISF; In the P and Peri-implantitis (PI) group, it was found statistically significantly higher than the H, Healthy-Implant (HI), besides P showed higher levels compared to G (p<0.05). Within the limitations of our study, it can be said that IL-1β and TNF-α among inflammatory cytokines in GCF/PISF will increase in periodontal and peri-implanter diseases, it can also be said that this increase in cytokines may indicate that periodontal and peri-implanter diseases have similar immunological structure. Peri-implant mucositis without periodontitis history has similarity to peri-implantitis and periodontitis in terms of IL-1β and TNF-α levels in GCF/PISF.

Resumen: Se afirma que las enfermedades peri-implantarias tienen efectos destructivos similares a los de las enfermedades periodontales. Este estudio tiene como objetivo comparar los niveles de IL-1β y TNF-α en zonas sanas y enfermas. Cuarenta individuos no fumadores con salud sistémica (40 implantes/40 dientes) (edad:38-67) fueron incluidos en el estudio. En los exámenes clínicos y radiográficos se registraron los valores de índice de placa (PIn), índice gingival (GI), profundidad de la bolsa periodontal (PPD), nivel de fijación clínica (CAL) y pérdida de hueso marginal (MBL). Se recogieron los fluidos creviculares gingivales (GCF) y los fluidos del surco peri-implantario (PISF) de los pacientes, y se midieron los niveles de IL-1β y TNF-α mediante ELISA en las muestras. Los datos recogidos fueron analizados con la ayuda del programa de paquete SPSS v.22. La puntuación PPD de la muestra mostró una diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre los grupos enfermos y sanos y también la muestra CAL mostró estadísticamente significativa más alta en la Periodontitis (P) en comparación con la salud periodontal (H) y la Gingivitis (G) (p>0.05). Los niveles de IL-1beta y TNF-α en GCF/PISF. En el grupo de P y Peri-implantitis (PI), se encontró estadísticamente significativo más alto que el H, implante sano (HI), además P mostró niveles más altos en comparación con G (p<0.05). Dentro de las limitaciones de nuestro estudio, se puede decir que IL-1β y TNF-α entre las citoquinas inflamatorias en GCF/PISF aumentarán en las enfermedades periodontales y peri-implantarias. También se puede decir que este aumento de citoquinas puede indicar que las enfermedades periodontales y peri-implantarias tienen una estructura inmunológica similar. La mucositis peri-implantaria sin antecedentes de periodontitis tiene similitudes con la peri-implantitis y la periodontitis en cuanto a los niveles de IL-1β y TNF-α en la GCF/PISF.

Peri-Implant Diseases and Gastrointestinal Diseases

ABSTRACT@#Peri-implant diseases are serious problems that plagues today’s dentistry, both in terms of therapy and epidemiology. With the expansion of implantology practice and the increasing number of implants placed annually, the frequency of peri-implant diseases has greatly expanded. The clinical manifestations, in the absence of a globally established classification, are peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis, the counterparts of gingivitis and periodontitis, respectively. However, many doubts remain about their features. Official diagnostic criteria, globally recognised by the dental community, have not yet been introduced. The review presented possible association between gastrointestinal diseases and peri-implant diseases. Previous studies had revealed the association with significantly higher levels of bacteria in patient’s gastrointestinal disease at either gingivitis or in periodontitis site. Additionally, pathogenesis of the periodontitis is similar to peri-implant diseases.

Use of wide-field optical fluorescence for visualization of oral biofilm in a patient with peri-implant mucositis: a new approach / Uso da fluorescência óptica de campo amplo para visualização de biofilme oral em paciente com mucosite peri-implantar: uma nova abordagem

ABSTRACT Peri-implant diseases, caused by bacteria from biofilm related to dental implants, are one of the main causes of late loss of implants. In this sense, peri-implant diseases are divided into peri-implant mucositis, when it affects only the soft tissues, and peri-implantitis, when there is a bone involvement, which can lead to the failure of dental implant therapy. Thus, biofilm removal is essential for peri-implant health, allowing long-term success in implant therapy. To improve the visualization of oral biofilm, which is usually transparent or colorless, disclosing agents have been routinely used. However, disclosing agents have allergenic potential and can cause staining extrinsically in restorative and prosthetic materials, leading to aesthetic impairment. Thus, the use of fluorescence has been studied as an alternative for visualization of oral biofilm. Therefore, this report describes the use of wide-field optical fluorescence for visualization of oral biofilm associated with implants and teeth, in a routine appointment and follow-up of a partially edentulous patient with peri-implant mucositis. In addition, this report showed wide-field optical fluorescence can be used in a clinical routine of care of patients with dental implants. In this sense, wide-field optical fluorescence allowed easy and immediate visualization of the mature oral biofilm for its adequate removal, evaluation of the quality of restoration to sealing of screw access-hole of implant and identification of cariogenic lesions, without risk of allergic reactions or staining of prostheses and restorations.

RESUMO Doenças peri-implantares, causadas por bactérias de biofilme relacionadas a implantes dentários, são uma das principais causas de perda tardia de implantes. Nesse sentido, as doenças peri-implantares são divididas em mucosite peri-implantar, quando afeta apenas tecidos moles, e peri-implantite, quando há comprometimento ósseo, o que pode levar ao fracasso da terapia com implantes dentários. Assim, a remoção do biofilme é essencial para a saúde peri-implantar, permitindo sucesso a longo prazo na terapia com implantes. A fim de melhorar a visualização do biofilme oral, que geralmente é transparente ou incolor, agentes reveladores têm sido rotineiramente utilizados. No entanto, esses agentes têm potencial alergênico e podem causar manchas extrinsecamente em materiais restauradores e protéticos, levando a prejuízo estético. Assim, o uso da fluorescência tem sido estudado como alternativa para visualização do biofilme oral. Este relato descreve o uso da fluorescência óptica de campo amplo para visualização do biofilme oral associado a implantes e dentes em uma consulta de acompanhamento de rotina de uma paciente parcialmente edêntula com mucosite peri-implantar. Além disso, este relato evidenciou que a fluorescência óptica de campo amplo pode ser utilizada dentro da rotina clínica de atendimento de pacientes com implantes dentários. Nesse sentido, a fluorescência óptica de campo amplo permitiu a visualização fácil e imediata do biofilme oral maduro para sua remoção adequada, a avaliação da qualidade da restauração do selamento do orifício de acesso do parafuso do implante e a identificação de lesões cariogênicas, sem risco de reações alérgicas ou manchamento de próteses e restaurações.

Prevalence and risk indicators of peri-implantitis after 8 to 10 years of function / Prevalência e indicadores de risco de peri-implantite após 8 a 10 anos em função

Abstract Introduction The investigation of peri-implant diseases risk indicators helps to prevent and target treatment techniques. Objective The aim of this cross-sectional study was to determine the occurrence of peri-implantitis and its potential risk indicator factors, besides to assess the long-term success and survival rates of dental implants after 8 to 10 years of function. Material and method For this, fifty individuals who had received their implant-supported rehabilitation between 2003 and 2005 were included. Data regarding demographics, medical and dental history were collected and a complete clinical examination was performed. Multivariate analysis was used to identify potential risk indicator factors related to the occurrence of peri-implantitis. Overall, 211 implants had been placed; 197 were in function, 9 were still submerged, and 5 had been lost. Result Success and survival rates were 81.5% and 97.6%, respectively. Peri-implant mucositis affected 77.1% of subjects and 52.3% of implants. Peri-implantitis was diagnosed in 14 individuals (29.2%) and 25 implants (12.7%). Subjects with osteoporosis (OR = 2.84) and generalized bleeding on probing (OR = 8.03) were significantly associated with higher odds of peri-implantitis. At the implant level, visible plaque (OR = 4.45) and deep probing depths (OR = 4.47) were significantly associated with peri-implantitis. Conclusion Through these results, our study suggests that osteoporosis and generalized periodontal/peri-implant mucosa inflammation increase the likelihood of peri-implantitis.

Resumo Introdução A investigação dos fatores indicadores de risco para as doenças peri-implantares auxilia na prevenção e direcionamento das técnicas de tratamento Objetivo O objetivo deste estudo transversal foi determinar a ocorrência de peri-implantite e seus potenciais fatores indicadores de risco, além de avaliar as taxas de sucesso e sobrevida em longo prazo dos implantes dentários após 8 a 10 anos de função Material e método Foram incluídos cinquenta indivíduos que receberam sua reabilitação implanto-suportada entre 2003 e 2005. Dados demográficos, história médica e odontológica foram coletados e um exame clínico completo foi realizado. A análise multivariada foi utilizada para identificar potenciais fatores indicadores de risco relacionados à ocorrência de peri-implantite. Ao todo, 211 implantes foram colocados; 197 estavam em função, 9 ainda estavam submersos e 5 haviam sido perdidos. Resultado As taxas de sucesso e sobrevivência foram de 81,5% e 97,6%, respectivamente. A mucosite peri-implantar afetou 77,1% dos indivíduos e 52,3% dos implantes. A peri-implantite foi diagnosticada em 14 indivíduos (29,2%) e 25 implantes (12,7%). Indivíduos com osteoporose (OR = 2,84) e sangramento generalizado à sondagem (OR = 8,03) foram significativamente associados a uma maior chance de peri-implantite. Ao nível do implante, a placa visível (OR = 4,45) e as maiores profundidades de sondagem (OR = 4,47) foram significativamente associadas à peri-implantite. Conclusão Por meio desses resultados, nosso estudo sugere que a osteoporose e a inflamação generalizada da mucosa periodontal / peri-implantar aumentam a probabilidade de peri-implantite.