RESUMO
Objective To explore the relationship between different blood glucose levels and prognosis in patients with acute severe craniocerebral injury.Methods Clinical data of 120 patients with acute severe craniocerebral injury from Jun.2014 to Jun.2017 in Department of Neurosurgery,Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University were analyzed retrospectively.The patients were divided into the group of acute severe craniocerebral injury and the group of acute extra-severe craniocerebral injury according to the Glasgow coma score (GCS).Blood glucose levels were detected at the time of admission,the 1st day,the 3rd day,the 7th day and the 14th day after operation.According to the blood glucose levels on admission,the patients were divided into the normal blood glucose group,the blood glucose value of 6.1-10.0 mmol/L group,the blood glucose value ＞ 10.0 mmol/L group.The prognosis was evaluated by Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) 3 months after discharge.The relationship between the blood glucose levels and GOS score in different groups was analyzed.Results The blood glucose levels in the group of acute extra-severe craniocerebral injury were higher than those in the group of acute severe craniocerebral injury,and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).Of the patients with acute severe craniocerebral injury,54 had good prognosis,and 16 had poor prognosis.Of the patients with acute extra-severe craniocerebral injury,28 had good prognosis,and 22 had poor prognosis.The rate of good prognosis were 77.1％ and 56％ respectively,and the difference had statistical significance (P=0.014,x2=6.025).The good prognosis of patients with normal blood glucose group was 23 and the poor prognosis was 4,with a good prognosis rate of 85.2％ (23/27).Among patients with blood glucose of 6.1-10.0 mmol/L,30 had good prognosis and 8 had poor prognosis,with a good prognosis rate of 78.9％(30/38).Among patients with blood glucose ＞10.0 mmol/L,31 had good prognosis and 24 had poor prognosis,with a good prognosis rate of 56.4％ (31/55).With the increase of blood glucose,the good prognosis rate gradually decreased and the poor prognosis rate gradually increased,and the difference was statistically significant(P=0.010,x2=9.283).Conclusion Blood glucose level has influence on the prognosis of patients with acute severe craniocerebral injury,and the good prognosis of patients with acute severe craniocerebral injury is severely affected by hyperglycemia.
RESUMO
Objective: To investigate the effects of complex prescription astragalus mongholicus injection(复方黄芪注射液) on the serum concentrations of neuron-specific enolase(NSE),myelin basic protein(MBP) and S100 protein B(S100B) in cases with acute severe craniocerebral injury.Methods: One hundred and ninety-six patients with acute severe craniocerebral injury were randomly divided into two groups.The treated group was treated with complex prescription astragalus mongholicus injection plus conventional treatments including dehydration,antibiotics,organ functional support,nerve nutrition,prevention of complication,etc;the control group was treated with conventional treatments alone.The concentrations of NSE,MBP and S100B in plasma at admission and at 4,7 and 10 days after treatment were determined;the Glasgow coma score(GCS) at admission and at 1 week and 2 weeks after hospitalization and the Glasgow outcome scale(GOS) after 3 months were compared to observe the long-term efficacy in the patients.Results: After treatment,the concentrations of serum NSE,MBP and S100B in the treatment group were all lower than those in the control group,the differences being significant(NSE(14.62?3.38)?g/L vs.(21.54?5.68) ?g/L,MBP(7.52?1.06) mg/L vs.(10.21?2.01) mg/L,S100B(0.90?0.28) ?g/L vs.(1.20?0.34) ?g/L,all P0.05);the GCSs of the patients at 1 week,2 weeks and GOS at 3 months after treatment in the complex prescription astragalus mongholicus injection group were significantly higher than those in the control group(GCS, 1 week(9.8?2.6)score vs.(7.2?2.1) score,2 weeks(10.6?3.0) score vs.(7.8?2.2) score;GOS,3 months after treatment(4.8?1.0) score vs.(3.6?0.8) score,all P