RESUMO
Resumen Introducción: Evaluar la empatía es cada vez más necesario dentro de diferentes áreas de investigación. Objetivo: El presente estudio presenta un análisis de las propiedades psicométricas del cuestionario Test de Empatía Cognitiva y Afectiva (TECA) que evalúa la empatía desde una perspectiva integral; siendo uno de los pocos construidos originalmente en el lenguaje español. Método: Sé evaluó la fiabilidad y validez de constructo en 607 adultos (137 hombres/ 470 mujeres) estudiantes de población mexicana. Resultados: Los resultados muestran una adecuada fiabilidad del instrumento en general (α = .86). Sin embargo, los análisis factoriales exploratorios y confirmatorios sugiere la necesidad de revisar los ítems. Discusión: La incorporación de metodologías robustas que consideran la naturaleza ordinal de las escalas Likert, como el análisis factorial con la incorporación del intercepto aleatorio permiten mejorar el ajuste de los modelos sin alterar la estructura factorial original. Por último, la invariancia métrica no es alcanzada entre la muestra española original y la mexicana. Conclusiones: El TECA se puede aplicar en población mexicana pero se sugiere una revisión en la construcción de los ítems.
Abstract Introduction: Assessing empathy is an increasing necessity within different research areas. Objective: The present study aims to analyse psychometric properties of the Cognitive and Affective Empathy Test (TECA) questionnaire that assesses empathy from a comprehensive perspective; being one of the few originally built in the Spanish language. Method: The reliability and construct validity were evaluated in 607 adults (137 men / 470 women) students from the Mexican population. Results: The results show adequate reliability of the instrument in general (α = .86). However, the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyzes suggest the need to review the items. Discussion: The incorporation of new methodologies such as robust factor analysis for ordinal type data (i.e. like Likert scales), with the incorporation of the random intercept, allows improving the fit of the models without altering the original factorial structure. Finally, metric invariance is not reached between the original Spanish sample and the Mexican one. Conclusions: The TECA can be applied in the Mexican population but a review of the construction of the items is suggested.
RESUMO
RESUMO A literatura vem apontando um crescente interesse pelos estudos sobre como a empatia, em seus componentes cognitivo e afetivo, desenvolve-se em pessoas com Transtorno do Espectro Autista (TEA). Assim, esta revisão integrativa da literatura teve o objetivo de investigar a empatia, em seus componentes cognitivo e afetivo, em indivíduos com TEA e fatores associados. Para isso, efetuou-se uma busca por artigos científicos nas bases de dados PubMed, ERIC e PsycINFO. Adotaram-se as palavras-chave e marcadores booleanos Autism [or] ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder) [and] Empathy. Como resultado, foram recuperadas 180 publicações, das quais 26 foram analisadas. Os critérios de inclusão foram estudos empíricos - correlacionais e de intervenção - que abordassem as relações entre empatia e TEA, indexados nas bases de dados aqui mencionadas entre os anos de 2005 e 2020. As categorias resultantes da análise foram: empatia afetiva e cognitiva, diferenças associadas ao gênero na empatia e diferenças associadas à idade e ao Quociente de inteligência(QI) em pessoas com TEA. Verificou-se que a empatia cognitiva, que envolve a inferência de emoção do estado mental de outra pessoa, pode ser reduzida em pessoas com TEA, enquanto a empatia afetiva, que se refere à capacidade de compartilhar a emoção dos outros, não apresenta déficit. Além disso, alguns estudos apontaram para a importância do ensino de responsividade empática em crianças com TEA. Contudo, não foram encontrados artigos em bases brasileiras sobre o tema, assinalando uma importante lacuna de pesquisas sobre a empatia em pessoas com autismo no cenário nacional.
ABSTRACT Literature has shown a growing interest in studies on how empathy, regarding its cognitive and affective components, can be developed in people with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Thus, this integrative literature review aimed to investigate empathy, in its cognitive and affective components, in individuals with TEA and associated factors. For this, a search for scientific papers was carried out in the PubMed, ERIC, and PsycINFO electronic databases. The keywords and Boolean operators Autism [or] ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder) [and] Empathy were adopted. As a result, 180 publications were found, and 26 were analyzed. The inclusion criteria were empirical pieces of research - correlational and intervention - that addressed the relationship between empathy and ASD, indexed in the databases already mentioned between 2005 and 2020. The categories resulting from the investigation were: affective and cognitive empathy, gender differences in empathy, and differences related to age and Intelligence Quotient (IQ) in individuals with ASD. The studies showed that cognitive empathy, which involves the inference of emotion from another person's mental state, can be reduced in people with ASD, while affective empathy, which refers to the ability to share the emotions of others, does not suffer the same deficit. In addition, some studies have pointed to the importance of teaching empathic responsiveness in children with ASD. No studies were found in Brazilian databases on the topic, signaling an important research gap on empathy in people with autism on the national scene.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The cognitive, Affective, and Somatic Empathy Scale (CASES) suggests novel three components structure of empathy. Although CASES developed to assess the trait empathy of both children and adult, the validation in adult sample is not yet conducted. This study developed Korean version of CASES (CASES-K) and examined the psychometric properties in young adult for first time. METHODS: Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to test whether the factor structure suggested in initial development study is valid in Korean young adult population. 350 young adults participated, and 44 of them also answered to other empathy scales for validation. The construct validity was ascertained through a series of correlational analysis with widely used trait empathy scales. RESULTS: The result of confirmatory factor analysis supports the three-factor model of empathy consists of affective, cognitive and somatic facets. The construct validity was ascertained through a series of correlational analysis with widely used trait empathy scales. The result of correlational analysis supports the validity of CASES-K, and especially the separation of somatic empathy from affective empathy. CONCLUSION: The current study provides the first evidence of the validity and utility of the CASES-K in young adult population. The result also supports the commonality of three factor structure of empathy in both East Asian and Caucasian, from the children to adults.