RESUMO
OBJECTIVE:To provide reference for the rational use of narcotic drugs. METHODS:The utilization of narcotic drugs for inpatients in our hospital during 2012-2014 were collected from HIS,and analyzed statistically in respects of consumption amount,consumption sum,DDDs,B/A,DDC and consumption amount of the different departments,and so on. RESULTS:The quantity and consumption amount of Morphine sulfate sustained-release tablets,Oxycodone hydrochloride sustained-release tablets and Codeine phosphate tablet ranked the first 3 places during 2012-2014. Morphine sulfate sustained-release tablets,Oxycodone hy-drochloride sustained-release tablets and Fentanyl transdermal patch(8.4 mg)steadily occupied the first 3 places in the list of con-sumption sum. In the list of DDDs,Fentanyl transdermal patch and Morphine sulfate sustained-release tablets took up the first 3 places;Morphine hydrochloride injection,Bucinnazine hydrochloride injection and Meperidine hydrochloride injection occupied the last 3 places. B/A value of Morphine sulfate sustained-release tablets and Fentanyl transdermal patch(8.4 mg) in 2012,Oxycodo-ne hydrochloride sustained-release tablets in 2014,Fentanyl transdermal patch(2.5 mg)in 2013 and 2014 were all equal to 1 and synchronized well. Others were all biased. DDC of narcotic drugs kept stable in 3 years,and DDC of Oxycodone hydrochloride sus-tained-release tablets took up the first place,followed by Fentanyl transdermal patch (8.4 mg). Narcotic drugs were consumed in 19 departments,but mainly in the department of oncology and general surgery. In the department of oncology,the consumption amount and sum of oral formulation were both significantly higher than other dosage forms,accounting for more than 88% and 52% respectively. CONCLUSIONS:The variety and dosage form of narcotic drugs could meet the clinical needs and its application is basically reasonable. Besides,the utilization of narcotic drugs in the department of oncology consistent with the basic principles of WHO three steps cancer analgesia treatments.
RESUMO
INTRODUCCIÓN: los traumatismos se han relacionado siempre con el dolor como síntoma acompañante que influye negativamente en la evolución del paciente. OBJETIVO: valorar la atención a los pacientes politraumatizados en lo referente a la evaluación y tratamiento del dolor. MÉTODO: se realizó un estudio observacional, retrospectivo, de corte transversal, de enero a diciembre de 2013, en una muestra de 60 pacientes que ingresaron con diagnóstico de politrauma, en el Hospital Militar Central "Dr. Carlos J. Finlay". Se emplearon como descriptores estadísticos medidas de resumen de los datos cualitativos (razones y proporciones). RESULTADOS: el 83,3 % de los pacientes refirió dolor al menos una vez durante el ingreso; en 51,7 % se le evaluó el síntoma, utilizando la escala verbal simple en el 26,7 %; en el resto no se usó ninguna escala. Los antinflamatorios no esteroideos se indicaron en todos los casos, con gran variabilidad en relación a las dosificaciones e intervalos de administración. Fue escasa el uso de opioides (6,7 %), ketamina (3,4 %), anestésicos locales (3,4 %) y coadyuvantes (1,7 %). Prevaleció la indicación a demanda, administrándose la analgesia en este grupo en el 46,7 %. No se evaluó la reducción del dolor en el 50 % de los casos en que se administró la analgesia, constatándose su reducción solo en el 42,9 %. En el 91,7 % de la muestra se valoró el tratamiento como inadecuado. CONCLUSIONES: la evaluación y el tratamiento analgésico son inadecuados, confirmando la necesidad de implementar estrategias para mejorar el control del dolor en el trauma.
INTRODUCTION: trauma has been related always with pain as an accompanist symptom that affects negatively the evolution of the patient. This work aspire to value the attention to polytrauma patient refers to evaluation and treatment of the pain. METHODS: an observational, retrospective, transversal study was made, since January until December of 2013. The sample was 60 patients received in "Dr. Carlos J. Finlay" Military Central Hospital with polytrauma. Stadistics measures descriptors were employed (reasons and proportions). RESULTS: the 83.3 % of the patients reports pain, at least one time during the intern; only 56.0 % of these were evaluated; in 51.7 % of the sample were evaluated the symptom; in 26.7 % of the sample was used a verbal scale; the rest of the patients were no evaluated. In all of cases were used non-steroids anti-inflammatory drugs, with doses and administration intervals vary. The use of opioids (6.7 %), ketamina (3.4 %), local anesthesics (3.4 %) and support drugs (1.7 %) were poor. Prevail the demand indication (88.3 %), using indicate analgesia in 46.7 % of the sample. The reduction of pain was evaluated in 50.0 % of cases that received analgesia; verify it only in 42.9 % of patients. In 91.7 % of the sample was valued the treatment as inadecuated. CONCLUTIONS: the evaluation and treatment of pain is deficient, confirm the necessity of implement strategies of properties actuations.