Comparison of a Double Lumen Endobronchial Tube with a Single Lumen Tube with Bronchial Blocker for One Lung Anesthesia / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: Double lumen endobronchial tube and single lumen tube with bronchial blocker are most frequently used tubes for one lung anesthesia. This study compared the double lumen endobronchial tube with the single lumen tube with bronchial blocker to determine whether there were objective advantages of one over the other during one lung anesthesia. METHODS: Sixty patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Thirty patients were intubated with a left-sided double lumen endobronchial tube, and thirty patients were intubated with a single lumen tube with bronchial blocker. Each group was subdivided into two groups with a person intubating (i,e, certified anesthesiologist or resident) to compare the easiness of intubation according to the type of tube. Fiberoptic flexible bronchoscope was used in all patients. The following were studied 1) time required to position each tube until satisfactory placement achieved, 2) frequency of malposition after initial placement with fiberoptic bronchoscopy, 3) surgical exposure ranked by surgeons blinded to type of tube used, 4) easiness of tracheobronchial toilet (TBT). RESULTS: 1) Statistically significant differences were observed in time required to place each tube by resident(double lumen tube 5.73+/- 0.48 min. versus single lumen tube with bronchial blocker 4.18+/-0.70 min (P<0.05) and in easiness of TBT (double lumen tube 18/30 versus single lumen tube with bronchial blocker 27/30) (P<0.05). 2) No differences were observed in time required to position each tube by anesthesiologist, the frequency of malposition and surgical exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Single lumen tube with bronchial blocker is better in easiness of intubation by resident and in easiness of TBT than double lumen endobronchial tube. But the selection of two tubes depends upon type of surgery and familiarity of each tube by the anesthesiologist.

Clinical Evaluation of Univent Tube for One Lung Ventilation / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: Univent tube(endotracheal tube with a movable blocker), introduced by Inoue et al in 1982, has properties to overcome the disadvantages of double lumen endotracheal tube for one lung anesthesia. This study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of Univent tube for one lung ventilation. METHODS: Univent tube was inserted to the patients for open thoracic surgery and positioned to the side of bronchus under the guidance of fiberoptic bronchoscope that was scheduled to lung collapse. One lung anesthesia was performed with the inflation of cuff of blocker. Each case was anaylzed with respect to ease or difficulty of positioning of blocker, tube displacement, efficacy of lung collapse and adequacy of single lung ventilation. RESULTS: In the 69 patients out of 80 patients, adequate positioning was performed by first trial. In the two patients, insertion of bronchial blocker was failed that resulted in replacement with a double lumen tube. Observed disadvantages were delayed deflation(10 patients) of affected lung and displacement of bronchial cuff into the main tracheal lumen during position change or surgical manipulation(7 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Univent tube is useful for one lung anesthesia but there are several distinct limitaitons in the safe use.