Distancia intercanina e intermolar en dentición mixta y permanente

Problemas de espacio de crecimiento transversal en ambos maxilares pueden ser predichos al conocerse la distancia del ancho intercanino e intermolar. El objetivo del estudio fue determinar valores de medidas transversales de arcadas en pacientes con dentición mixta y dentición permanente del posgrado de Ortodoncia del Instituto Latinoamericano de Estudios Superiores. Estudio observacional descriptivo de corte transversal, se tomaron las distancias lineales horizontales intercaninas temporarios y permanentes, y la distancia intermolar en primeros molares permanentes en modelos de estudio de pacientes entre el 2014 y el 2019. Participaron 144 pacientes de 8 a 32 años, 41,67% tenía más de 15 años, 65,28% eran mujeres y el 52,78% tenía dentición permanente. Los promedios de distancia intercanina maxilar fueron 33,22 ± 3,95 mm en hombres y 33,34 ± 3,90 mm en mujeres, la mandibular 27,30 ± 2,81 y 27,40 ± 2,92 mm respectivamente. La distancia intermolar maxilar en hombres fue de 34,16 ± 3,27 y 34,15 ± 3,26 mm en mujeres; la mandibular fue de 33,97 ± 3,27 y 33,94 ± 3,27 mm respectivamente. Los promedios de la distancia intercanina son similares por edad y sexo, mientras que los promedios de la arcada inferior son menores a los de la arcada superior en ambos sexos. Los promedios para la distancia intermolar son similares por edad, sexo y arcada.

Transverse growth space problems in both maxillaries can be predicted by knowing the intercanine and intermolar width distance. The objective of the study was to determine values of transverse measures of arcades in patients with mixed dentition and permanent dentition of the postgraduate degree in Orthodontics of the Latin American Institute of Higher Studies. Descriptive observational cross-sectional study, the temporary and permanent intercanine horizontal linear distances were taken as well as the intermolar distance in permanent first molars in patient study models between 2014 and 2019. One hundred and forty-four patients aged from 8 to 32 years old participated, 41.67% were over 15 years old, 65.28% were women and 52.78% had permanent dentition. The mean maxillary intercanine distance was 33.22 ± 3.95 mm in men and 33.34 ± 3.90 mm in women, the mandibular 27.30 ± 2.81 and 27.40 ± 2.92 mm respectively. The maxillary intermolar distance was 34.16 ± 3.27 mm in men and 34.15 ± 3.26 mm in women, the mandibular 33.97 ± 3.27 and 33.94 ± 3.27 mm respectively. The averages of the intercanine distance were similar by age and sex, while the means of the lower arcades were lower than those of the upper arcade in both sexes. Means of the intermolar distance was similar by age, sex, and arcade.

Arch parameters and dental discrepancy (crowding and spacing) in a sample of an Afro-Colombian population / Parámetros de arco y discrepancia dental (apiñamiento y espaciamiento) en una muestra de población Afrocolombiana

The aim of this study was to determine the differences in arch length, inter-canine distance, inter-premolar distance, intermolar distance and arch shape between dental discrepancies (crowding and spacing) in a sample of dental casts from the Afro-Colombian population of San Basilio de Palenque. An analytical, cross-sectional study was conducted on a convenience sample of 63 subjects aged 11 to 57years, of Afro-Colombian origin, with full dentition from first molar to first molar, without extensive caries or restorations, and excluding casts with defects due to loss. The differences between arch (upper and lower) variables were analyzed according to dental discrepancies. Plaster models digitalized with a TR1OS3 Mono scanner with exactitude (6.9 ± 0.9 pm) and precision (4.5 ± 0.9 pm) were analyzed with Orthonalyzer software. Statistical analyses were done on SPSS software (Version 20 for Windows) and Real Statistics. Spacing discrepancy of68.25% was found for upper arch and 66.66% for lower arch; crowding discrepancy of 19.04% for upper arch and 20.63% for lower arch, and an adequate ratio of 12.69% for both arches. No statistically significant difference (p>0.05) was found between arch parameters except for inter-premolar distance on the lower arch. The most frequent arch shape in the population was oval for both upper arch, with 76.19%, and lower arch, with 71.42%. Tooth size was larger in males than females but the difference was not statistically significant.

El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar las diferencias en longitud de arco, distancia intercanina, interpremolar, intermolar y la forma de arco entre discrepancias dentales (apiñamiento y espaciamiento), en una muestra de modelos dentales de la población afrocolombiana de San Basilio de Palenque. Se realizó un estudio analítico transversal, en una muestra por conveniencia de 63 sujetos con un rango de edad entre 11 y 57 años, de origen afrocolombiano, quienes tuvieron dentición completa de primer molar a primer molar, sin caries extensas, ni restauraciones; se excluyeron los modelos con defectos por el vaciado. Se analizaron las diferencias entre las variables de los maxilares (superior e inferior) con las discrepancias dentales. Se utilizaron modelos de yeso que fueron digitalizados con el escánerTR1OS3 Mono con una exactitud de (6.9 ± 0.9 pm) y una precisión de (4.5 ± 0.9 pm)y analizados con el software Orthonalyzer. Los análisis estadísticos se llevaron a cabo utilizando el software SPSS (Versión 20 para Windows) y Real Statistics. Se encontró una discrepancia de espaciamiento de un 68,25% para el arco superior y 66,66% en el arco inferior; y una discrepancia de apiñamiento en el arco superior de 19,04% e inferior de 20,63% y una relación adecuada de 12,69% para los dos arcos. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p>0.05) en los parámetros de arco a excepción de la distancia interpremolar del arco inferior. La forma de arco más frecuente en la población fue ovalada tanto en el arco superior con un 76,19% como en el arco inferior con un 71,42%. En cuanto al tamaño dental, se presentó mayor tamaño en los hombres que en las mujeres, pero este no fue estadísticamente significativo.

Transverse measurements of the jaws of patients with a predominance of nose and mouth breathing in children between 6 and 14 years of age / Medidas transversais dos maxilares de pacientes com predominância de respiração nasal e bucal em crianças de 6 a 14 anos

Objectives: To determine and study the occurrence of possible growth and development anomalies of the craniofacial complex in patients aged between 6 and 14, diagnosed with predominantly mouth and nose breathing patterns, and without having received prior dental treatment. Methods: We performed transverse jaw measurements on 103 patients between 6 and 14 years of age, registered for orthodontic treatment in theMilitary Hospital in the Brasilia area. Divided into two groups: Group 1, patients with predominance of nose breathing and Group 2, patientswith predominance of mouth breathing. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the upper and lower intercanine or upper intermolar distances, between groups 1 and 2. A smaller statistically significant difference was observed in group 2 when evaluating the lower intermolar distance. Conclusion: The group of mouth breathers showed statistically lower values in the lower jaw, thus suggesting a contraction in the posterior arch of patients diagnosed with this breathing pattern.

Objetivos: Verificar e estudar a ocorrência de possíveis anomalias de crescimento e desenvolvimento do complexo craniofacial, de pacientes diagnosticados com o padrão de respiração predominante bucal e nasal, na faixa etária de 6 a 14 anos de idade, sem tratamento ortodôntico prévio.Métodos: Foram realizadas as medidas transversais maxilares em 103 pacientes na faixa etária dos 6 a 14 anos de idade, inscritos para tratamento ortodôntico no Hospital Militar de Área de Brasília. Divididos em dois grupos: 1 pacientes com predominância de respiração nasal e 2 pacientes com predominância de respiração bucal. Resultados: Não foram observadas diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre as distâncias inter-caninos superior e inferior, inter-molares superior, entre os grupos 1 e 2. Foi observada diferença estatisticamente significativa menor no grupo 2 quando avaliada a distância inter-molar inferior. Conclusão: O grupo de pacientes respiradores bucais apresentou valores estatisticamente menores na arcada inferior, sugerindo desta forma uma contração posterior na arcada dos pacientes diagnosticados com este padrão de respiração.