Fracturas de la extremidad proximal de húmero en tres y cuatro fragmentos en el anciano: ¿Tratamiento conservador o artroplastia reversa? / Fractures of the humeral proximal extremity in three and four fragments in the elderly patient: conservative treatment or reverse arthroplasty?

OBJETIVO Comparar los resultados funcionales obtenidos en dos cohortes de pacientes ancianos tratados de forma quirúrgica (artroplastia reversa de hombro) versus tratamiento conservador. MATERIAL Y METODOS Estudio ambispectivo, no aleatorizado. Se incluyeron pacientes de 75 años o más, 15 tratados de forma quirúrgica y 16 siguieron tratamiento conservador. Seguimiento mínimo de 12 meses. A los 3, 6 y 12 meses de la fractura evaluamos las escalas ASES, Constant-Murley and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (DASH) y EVA. Además evaluamos los resultados radiológicos y las complicaciones. RESULTADOS No encontramos diferencias significativas para las escalas ASES, DASH, ni EVA .El grupo tratado de forma quirúrgica obtuvo a los 12 meses una puntuación media en la escala Constant mayor, diferencia estadísticamente significativa(75.1 þ/-10.3 vs. 51.9 þ/-12.4 p » 0.001). Además presentaban mayor rango de movilidad para flexión y rotación externa (128.9 þ/-17 versus 99.3 þ/-20.1 p » 0.001, and 35.7 þ/-13.9 vs. 23.4 þ/-15.5 p » 0.032). El 43% de los pacientes tratados mediante artroplastia reversa presentaban tuberosidades normoposicionadas y mejores resultados en las escalas versus pacientes con tuberosidades ausentes o malposicionadas. El grupo sometido a cirugía no presentó mayor tasa de complicaciones.CONCLUSIONES El tratamiento conservador en las fracturas de EPH en tres y cuatro fragmentos en pacientes ancianos ofrece buenos resultados en cuanto a dolor y funcionalidad en la mayoría de pacientes. Falta por definir qué pacientes por tener alta demanda funcional serían candidatos a tratamiento quirúrgico de entrada

OBJECTIVE This study compared functional results in two cohorts of older adults with three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) per Neer's classification treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) or nonoperative management. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ambispective, non-randomized study with two cohorts of patients aged 75 or older treated with RSA (n » 15) or nonoperative management (n » 16) with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. We analyzed the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant-Murley, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores and the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at 3, 6, and 12 months. In addition, we recorded radiological findings and surgical complications. RESULTS The mean Constant-Murley score at 12 months was significantly higher for the RSA group (75.1 þ/- 10.3 vs. 51.9 þ/- 12.4, p » 0.001). There were no differences in ASES, DASH, and VAS scores. Statistically significant differences for flexion and external rotation in abduction favored the RSA group (128.9 þ/- 17.0 versus 99.3 þ/- 20.1, p » 0.001, and 35.7 þ/- 13.9 vs. 23.4 þ/- 15.5, p » 0.032, respectively). For the RSA group, tuberosity positioning was correct in 43% of subjects. These patients presented better scores than those with malpositioned or absent tuberosities but with no statistical significance. Complications in the surgical group were not higher. CONCLUSIONS Nonoperative treatment is a valid option regarding pain and functionality in elderly patients with three- and four-part PHFs. Characteristics of patients with high demands who may be candidates for the initial surgical treatment remain to be defined

Tuberosity Healing after Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures: Is there Clinical Improvement? / Consolidação dos tubérculos na artroplastia reversa do ombro após fratura proximal do úmero: Existe melhoria nos resultados funcionais?

Abstract Objective To compare the functional results of patients with complex proximal humerus fracture submitted to total shoulder reverse arthroplasty with and without tuberosity healing. The secondary goal was to know the tuberosity healing rate after reverse shoulder arthroplasty with our surgical technique. Methods A retrospective, cohort type study, with a prospective database collection. In total, 28 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria: age ≥ 65 years, reverse shoulder arthroplasty for complex proximal humerus fracture (type-3 or -4, according to Neer), and a minimum of 24 months of follow-up. At six months of follow-up, all of the patients were evaluated radiographically for tuberosity, and then they were divided into 2 groups: those with healed tuberosities and those with non-healed tuberosities. A clinical evaluation using the Constant score, active range of motion and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at the last follow-up was also performed. Results Tuberosity healing occurred in 21 patients (76.3%). There were statistically significant differences in the Constant scoring system (p < 0.001), forward elevation (p = 0.020), internal rotation (p = 0.001) and external rotation (p = 0.003) when comparing the group of healed tuberosities with the group of non-healed tuberosities. No differences were found regarding the VAS score. Conclusion Tuberosity healing results in an improvement of the functional outcomes of patients submitted to reverse shoulder arthroplasty as a treatment for complex proximal humeral fractures in the elderly.

Resumo Objetivo Comparar os resultados funcionais entre pacientes com fratura complexa do úmero proximal submetidos a artroplastia reversa com tubérculos consolidados e tubérculos não consolidados. O objetivo secundário foi determinar a taxa de consolidação dos tubérculos com este tipo de prótese. Métodos Estudo de tipo coorte, retrospectivo, com coleta prospectiva de dados. No total, 28 pacientes cumpriram os critérios de inclusão: idade superior a 65 anos, prótese reversa do ombro por fratura complexa do úmero proximal (3 ou 4 partes, segundo Neer), e tempo de seguimento mínimo de 24 meses. Aos seis meses, todos os pacientes foram avaliados radiograficamente quanto à consolidação dos tubérculos e divididos em dois grupos: grupo com tubérculos consolidados e grupo com tubérculos não consolidados. A avaliação funcional realizou-se segundo o sistema de pontuação de Constant, da amplitude de movimento ativo, e da Escala Visual Analógica (EVA) à data da última consulta. Registaram-se todas as complicações. Resultados A consolidação dos tubérculos ocorreu em 21 pacientes (76,3%). Verificou-se diferenças estatisticamente significativas no sistema de pontuação de Constant (p < 0.001), elevação anterior (p = 0.020), rotação interna (p = 0.001) e externa (p = 0.003), quando se comparou o grupo dos tubérculos consolidados com o grupo dos tubérculos não consolidados. Não houve diferenças significativas na EVA entre os 2 grupos. Conclusão A consolidação dos tubérculos traduz uma melhoria dos resultados funcionais em pacientes submetidos a artroplastia reversa do ombro como tratamento de fraturas complexas do úmero proximal em idosos.

Complicaciones de la artroplastía de hombro: reporte de un caso / Shoulder arthroplasty complications: case report

Resumen: Antecedentes: La infección e inestabilidad se encuentran entre las complicaciones de más difícil manejo en la cirugía protésica de hombro. La inestabilidad acumula hasta la mitad de los casos, mientras que la infección por hongos representa menos de 1% del total de infecciones y pueden causar daño severo a nivel óseo y de partes blandas. Métodos: En este caso clínico se presenta una infección fúngica por Candida parapsilosis en una hemiartroplastía de hombro indicada por una fractura de húmero proximal. Se dio tratamiento quirúrgico en dos tiempos y administración de fluconazol durante ocho semanas previo al segundo tiempo quirúrgico. En la revisión se colocó una prótesis reversa como tratamiento definitivo; sin embargo, el paciente sufrió varios episodios de luxación en el postoperatorio. Fue necesaria una segunda cirugía de revisión protésica para sustituir por componentes de mayor estabilidad. Durante la misma, se extrajeron muestras que fueron analizadas, obteniéndose resultados negativos para infección. Resultados: Actualmente tras tres años de seguimiento, el paciente se encuentra bien, sin limitaciones en su labor diaria y tiene un Constant Score de 50.5. Discusión: Reportamos nuestra experiencia en esta situación excepcional. A nuestro conocer, éste es uno de los primeros casos en los que la infección fúngica y la luxación protésica coinciden en un mismo paciente. Esta situación es un reto para el cirujano, el cual tiene que tratar las dos complicaciones prácticamente a la vez. No se dispone de una evidencia científica para establecer un criterio unificado para el tratamiento de las complicaciones tras cirugía de revisión de artroplastía de hombro, especialmente en la prótesis reversa o megaprótesis.

Abstract: Background: Infection and instability are the complications of prosthetic shoulder surgery of more difficult management. Instability builds up to half of the cases, while the fungal infection accounts for less than 1% of all and can cause severe damage to bone and soft tissue. Methods: In this case clinical fungal infection by Candida parapsilosis is presented in a shoulder hemiarthroplasty indicated by a fracture of the proximal humerus. He received surgical treatment in two-stages and administration of fluconazole for eight weeks prior to the second surgical time. In revision surgery was placed a reverse prosthesis as definitive treatment; however, the patient suffered several episodes of dislocation in the postoperative period; a second revision prosthetic surgery was necessary to use more stable components. During this surgery, we extracted samples that were analyzed, obtaining negative results for infection. Results: Now after three years of follow-up, the patient is well, no limitations in their daily work and has a Constant Score of 50.5. Discussion: We report our experience in this exceptional situation. We know, this is one of the first cases where the fungal infection and dislocation prosthetics in the same patient meet. This situation is a challenge for the surgeon, which has to treat complications two practically at the same time; we do not have scientific evidence to establish a criterion unified for the treatment of complications after surgery for revision of arthroplasty of the shoulder, especially in reverse or mega-denture prosthesis.