El lenguaje de la insuficiencia cardiaca con fracción de eyección preservada en los últimos treinta años: un análisis bibliométrico / The language of heart failure with ejection fraction preserved in the last thirty years: a bibliometric analysis

Resumen Introducción: Los estudios bibliométricos permiten realizar un análisis cuantitativo y cualitativo de la producción científica en un campo determinado. En el área de la cardiología, la producción científica ha crecido sustancialmente durante las últimas décadas; sin embargo, existe poca información acerca del manejo integral de la insuficiencia cardiaca con fracción de eyección preservada (ICFEp). Objetivo: Realizar un análisis bibliométrico que proporcione una evaluación detallada del nivel de producción científica de la ICFEp. Método: Estudio bibliométrico descriptivo en el que se realizó una búsqueda en la literatura científica en los últimos 30 años respecto a la ICFEp, para lo cual se utilizó la estrategia de búsqueda "heart failure" AND "preserved ejection fraction" entre 1988 y 2018 en las bases de datos Web of Science, Scopus y Medline a partir de FABUMED y PubReMiner. Resultados: Se encontraron 2830, 4136 y 7943 publicaciones en las bases de datos Medline, Scopus y Web of Science, respectivamente. Los países destacados por su volumen de publicación fueron los Estados Unidos, el Reino Unido y Alemania. En Latinoamérica, los países más productivos fueron Brasil, Argentina y Chile, mientras que Colombia solo tuvo una publicación. Conclusiones: Este análisis bibliométrico es pionero en señalar la evolución de la investigación científica de la ICFEp en los últimos 30 años. Los resultados obtenidos representan un incentivo a la comunidad científica para priorizar la investigación sobre la ICFEp con el fin de mejorar el abordaje integral de los pacientes y, con ello, su calidad de vida.

Abstract Introduction: Bibliometric studies are defined as the quantitative and qualitative analysis of scientific production in each field. The scientific production in the area of cardiology has had a substantial growth during the last decades. Despite this, there is currently little information about heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Objective: To provide a detailed assessment of the current status and level of scientific production of HFpEF over the past 30 years. Method: Bibliometric study based in scientific literature concerning HFpEF for the period of 1988 - 2018 using the terms "heart failure" AND "preserved ejection fraction" in the databases of the Web of Science, Scopus and Medline using FABUMED and PubReMiner. Results: We found 2830, 4136 and 7943 publications in Medline, Scopus and Web of Science databases, respectively. The countries with higher scientific production in general were: United States, United Kingdom and Germany. In Latin America, the most productive countries were Brazil, Argentina and Chile. Colombia only had one publication. Conclusions: This is the first bibliometric analysis to highlight the production, evolution and current situation of scientific research about the HFpEF in the last 30 years, a call is made to the scientific community worldwide and especially in our country, Colombia, to focus in the scientific production on this subject. The above mentioned, in order to clarify the pathophysiology, reduce morbidity, mortality and improve the quality of life of patients suffering from HFpEF.

Development of group psychotherapy in China: A review from bibliometric perspective / 中国心理卫生杂志

Objective:To figure out the development status of group psychotherapy and its problems and trends in China.Methods:Properties and contents,intervention programs and methods of 386 chosen articles from key journals of psychology and Doctor & Master Thesis in the group psychotherapy area were examined with bibliometric analyses and content analysis.Result:It showed a fast increase in properties and contents for the last 15 years.The proportion of clinical and sub-clinical study was 1 ∶ 4.Totally 53.9％ of studies focused on anxiety and depression,89.4％ were quantitative studies and 86.9％ were effect studies.As for the intervention programs,36.5％ were CBT,90.0％ were short-term treatment group below 12 times,35.6％ were lack of details in introductions and 67.8％ had other missing descriptions of group leader.As for the methods,34.9％ of participants were undergraduates,experimental (34.9％) and comprehensive (44.6％) methods were dominant,and difference test (58.3％) was most widely used statistical analysis.The self-report effect evaluation accounted for about 91.4％,and the follow-up studies were less than 22％.Totally 42.9％ of studies were lack of ethical consideration.Conclusion:The status of group psychotherapy in China is still in its early developmental phase,which need further standardization and improvement.