RESUMO
El pico de masa ósea (PMO) se alcanza entre los 20 y 35 años, pero la aposición ósea continúa hasta alcanzar el pico de fortaleza ósea (PFO). Se crea así una ventana entre ambos picos que podría ser evaluada mediante marcadores bioquímicos de recambio óseo, ya que durante dicho período la densidad mineral permanece constante. El objetivo fue determinar el final de la aposición ósea mediante marcadores bioquímicos óseos. Se evaluaron por décadas entre 20 y 49 años de edad 139 sujetos sanos de ambos sexos (69 hombres y 70 mujeres), determinando fosfatasa alcalina ósea (FAO), osteocalcina (OC), propéptido amino terminal del colágeno tipo 1 (P1NP) y telopéptido C-terminal del colágeno tipo 1 (CTX). Los marcadores correlacionan negativamente con la edad (OC: r= -0,3; p<0,01; P1NP: r= -0,4; p< 0,01 y CTX: r= -0,4; p<0,01), exceptuando FAO. En hombres de 20-29 años, P1NP y el CTX fueron significativamente mayores vs. 30-39 años (p<0,05 y p<0,001, respectivamente), y entre 30-39 años vs. de 40-49 años en P1NP y CTX (p<0,05; p<0,001, respectivamente). En mujeres de 20-29 años, P1NP y CTX fueron significativamente mayores vs. 30-39 años (p<0,0001 y p<0,01, respectivamente). Conclusión: los marcadores de remodelado óseo más sensibles y específicos permitirían determinar bioquímicamente el fin de la aposición ósea que se produce entre el PMO y el PFO. Si bien es necesario ampliar el número de sujetos evaluados, los datos que surgen de la presente investigación sentarían las bases para futuros estudios epidemiológicos referidos al fin de la aposición ósea. (AU)
Peak bone mass is achieved between 20-35 years; however bone apposition continues to reach an optimal skeleton strength. The window between peak bone mass and peak bone apposition may be evaluated by biochemical bone turnover markers. The objective of this study was to determine the end of bone apposition through biochemical bone markers in both sexes. A total of 139 subjects (69 men and 70 women) were divided by decades between 20 and 49 years of age. Bone alkaline phosphatase (BAL), osteocalcin (OC), type I collagen propeptide (P1NP) and type I collagen C-terminal telopeptide (CTX) were evaluated. Except BAL, the other bone markers negatively correlated with the age [OC (r= -0.3; p<0.01); P1NP (r= -0.4; p<0.01) and CTX (r= -0.4; p<0.01)]. Regarding men aged 20 to 29 years, P1NP and CTX were significantly higher vs. 30-39 years (p<0.05 y p<0.001, respectively) and. vs. 40-49 years (p<0.05; p<0.001, respectively). In women, the results were similar. Regarding 20-29 years, P1NP and CTX were higher vs. 30-39 years (p<0.001 y p<0.01, respectively). Bone remodeling rate decreases after the third decade, suggesting the end of the apposition period of peak bone mass. Conclusion: The most specific and sensitive bone markers would biochemically determine the end of bone apposition that extends between the peak of bone mass and the peak of bone strength. Although it is necessary to increase the number of subjects evaluated, the data that emerge from the present study would establish the bases for future epidemiological studies referring to the end of bone apposition. (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Reabsorção Óssea/fisiopatologia , Biomarcadores , Osteoblastos/fisiologia , Osteoclastos/fisiologia , Osteogênese/fisiologia , Osso e Ossos/metabolismo , Densidade Óssea/fisiologia , Osteocalcina/sangue , Cálcio/sangue , Fatores Etários , Remodelação Óssea/fisiologia , Creatinina/sangue , Colágeno Tipo I/biossíntese , Colágeno Tipo I/sangue , Densitometria , Fosfatase Alcalina/sangue , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controleRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The fears and side effects of a prolonged hormone replacement therapy on the postmenopausal symptoms reinforce a growing interest about alternatives. The present study was performed to investigate whether black cohosh root extract (BCRE) can be used or not as an alternative to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in order to relieve postmenopausal symptoms. MATERIAL & METHODS: Randomized, double-blind prospective clinical trial examined the effects of BCRE and HRT on Kupperman index, biochemical bone markers, lipid profiles, and side effects in 74 women with postmenopausal symptoms. Treatments included placebo (Festal(R)) (n=12), BCRE (Feramin(R)) (n=32) and HRT (Premarin(R)) (n=30) for 3 months. Kupperman index, biochemical bone markers (osteocalcin and deoxypyridinoline), and lipid profiles (total cholesterol, triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol) were measured at 0, 1 and 3 months. Side effects were checked at 3 months. RESULTS: BCRE was significantly effective in lowering of Kupperman index as much as HRT at two control times (1 month: p<0.05, 3 months: p<0.001). It also showed slightly favorable effects on biochemical bone markers and lipid profiles but not statistically significant. Fewer side effects were seen in BCRE than HRT. CONCLUSION: BCRE appears to be a safe and effective alternative to HRT for early postmenopausal symptoms and may be especially useful in women with intolerances or contraindications to traditional HRT.
Assuntos
Feminino , Humanos , Colesterol , Cimicifuga , Terapia de Reposição Hormonal , Estudos Prospectivos , TriglicerídeosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The fears and side effects of a prolonged hormone replacement therapy on the postmenopausal symptoms reinforce a growing interest about alternatives. The present study was performed to investigate whether black cohosh root extract (BCRE) can be used or not as an alternative to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in order to relieve postmenopausal symptoms. MATERIAL & METHODS: Randomized, double-blind prospective clinical trial examined the effects of BCRE and HRT on Kupperman index, biochemical bone markers, lipid profiles, and side effects in 74 women with postmenopausal symptoms. Treatments included placebo (Festal(R)) (n=12), BCRE (Feramin(R)) (n=32) and HRT (Premarin(R)) (n=30) for 3 months. Kupperman index, biochemical bone markers (osteocalcin and deoxypyridinoline), and lipid profiles (total cholesterol, triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol) were measured at 0, 1 and 3 months. Side effects were checked at 3 months. RESULTS: BCRE was significantly effective in lowering of Kupperman index as much as HRT at two control times (1 month: p<0.05, 3 months: p<0.001). It also showed slightly favorable effects on biochemical bone markers and lipid profiles but not statistically significant. Fewer side effects were seen in BCRE than HRT. CONCLUSION: BCRE appears to be a safe and effective alternative to HRT for early postmenopausal symptoms and may be especially useful in women with intolerances or contraindications to traditional HRT.
Assuntos
Feminino , Humanos , Colesterol , Cimicifuga , Terapia de Reposição Hormonal , Estudos Prospectivos , TriglicerídeosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the changes of bone mineral density (BMD), biochemical bone markers, and lipid profiles according to the duration of menopause in postmenopausal osteoporosis patient receiving continuous hormonal replacement therapy (c-HRT). METHOD: Sixty seven patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis who have been under c-HRT for more than two years were used as subjects and divided into two groups according to the time past menopause: group I (0~10 years), group II (over 10 years). The changes of BMD, biochemical bone markers, lipid profiles on one year and two years of c-HRT were comparatively analyzed in each group. RESULTS: 1) BMD of lumbar vertebra was increased and biochemical bone markers were decreased after c-HRT in both groups, but BMD of femur from both groups showed no statistical significant changes. 2) The changes in lumbar vertebra, deoxypyridinoline and osteocalcin were significantly higher after first one year than next one year of c-HRT in both groups, with no statistical differences between two groups. 3) Total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol were decreased, but HDL-cholesterol and triglyceride showed no significant changes after c-HRT in both groups. CONCLUSION: The effects of c-HRT on BMD, biochemical bone markers, lipid profiles were not influenced by postmenopausal period. And the effects of c-HRT during first one year were more prominent than those of c-HRT during next one year.