Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Journal of Medical Research ; (12): 123-127, 2017.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-608194

RESUMO

Objective To compare the therapeutic effects of 1470nm diode laser vaporization prostatectomy and bipolar transurethral plasmakinetic prostatectomy (TUPKP) for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).Methods From June 2015-February 2016 a total of 95 patients diagnosed with BPH were randomly divided into 2 group:52 patients were treated with TUPKP while 43 patients with 1470 diode laser.All patients were followed up with mean operative time,intra-operative blood loss,postoperative hospital stay,postoperative catheterization time,postoperative complications,international prostate symptom score (IPSS),score of life quality (QoL),maximum flow rate (Qmax),post-void residual (PVR) before and after surgery.Results Compared with data of preoperation,postoperative IPSS,QoL,Qmax,PVR in 6 months revealed significant improvement in both of two groups.IPSS of TUPKP group and 1470 group respectively dropped to 6.3 ± 2.6 and 6.7 ± 2.4.In TUPKP group,PVR reduced to 23.1 ± 20.9ml and in 1470 group decreased to 24.3 ± 19.9ml.While Qmax increased to 18.5 ± 3.1 ml/s and 18.7 ± 2.8ml/s respectively in TUPKP and 1470 group.In TUPKP group,operation time were 60.1 ± 14.9min,significantly less than that in 1470 group of 69.3 ± 12.9min (P < 0.05).Compared with catheterization time in 1470 group of 33.9 ± 9.4h,the time in TUPKP group of 73.9 ± 37.6h was shorter with significant difference (P < 0.05).While Curative effect of two groups of showed no significant difference (P > 0.05).Conclusion The clinical curative effect of two operation methods for patients with BPH showed no significant difference.1470 group had longer operation time,while TUPKP group had less intraoperative bleeding and postoperative recovery.

2.
National Journal of Andrology ; (12): 914-922, 2016.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-262303

RESUMO

<p><b>Objective</b>To evaluate the safety and effect of transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in comparison with bipolar transurethral plasmakinetic prostatectomy (TUPKP) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>We searched the databases of PubMed, SCI, Ovid, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, VIP, and Wangfang Data for controlled clinical trials about HoLEP versus TUPKP in the treatment of BPH published up to April 2016. The studies were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the data extracted, and their quality evaluated by 2 reviewers independently, followed by a meta-analysis using the RevMan 5.3 software.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>A total of 7 studies were included, involving 2031 cases. In comparison with TUPKP, HoLEP showed significantly longer operation time (WMD = 24.61, 95% CI 11.88, 37.34, P lt; 0.001), shorter hospital stay (WMD =-1.91, 95% CI -3.74, -0.07, P = 0.04), shorter bladder irrigation time (WMD = -21.50, 95% CI -34.95, -8.06, P = 0.002), shorter catheter-indwelling time (WMD = -27.60, 95% CI -48.17, -7.03, P = 0.009), less hemoglobin loss (WMD = - 0.42, 95% CI -0.78, -0.07, P = 0.02); lower postvoid residual urine (PVR) at 3 months (WMD = -3.35, 95% CI -4.46, -2.23, P<0.001) and 6 months after surgery (WMD =-1.11, 95% CI -2.18, -0.05, P = 0.04); higher maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) (WMD = 0.42, 95% CI 0.04, 0.80, P = 0.03) and fewer urinary tract irritation symptoms (OR =0.58, 95% CI 0.41, 0.81, P = 0.002) at 12 months after surgery. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in the volume of resected tissue, serum sodium reduction, urethral stricture, erectile dysfunction, retrograde ejaculation, or transient urinary incontinence (P>0.05), or in the improvement of the quality of life (QoL) at 1, 3 and 12 months, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months, Qmax at 1, 3 and 6 months, or International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) at 6 months after surgery (P>0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>HoLEP is preferred to TUPKP in clinical application for its advantages of higher Qmax at 12 months after surgery, lower PVR at 3 and 6 months, higher peri-operative safety, faster recovery, and fewer urinary tract irritation symptoms. However, for the quantity and quality limitations of the included publications, our findings are to be further supported by large-sample, multi-center, and high-quality prospective controlled clinical studies.</p>

3.
Chinese Journal of Urology ; (12): 678-681, 2013.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-442062

RESUMO

Objective To compare the safety and short-term efficacy of thulium laser resection of the prostate (TMLRP) and bipolar transurethral plasmakinetic prostatectomy (TUPKP) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients.Methods A total of 100 patients diagnosed with BPH were randomly divided into 2 groups:TMLRP group (50 cases) and TUPKP group (50 cases).There was no significant difference of preoperative variables such as age,prostate volume,PSA,IPSS,Qmax and PVR between the two groups (P>0.05).The perioperative parameters and therapeutic effects were recorded and compared between the two groups.Results Comparison between TMLRP group and TUPKP group included:operating time ((61.2±24.2) min versus (30.1±15.9) min),catheterization time ((1.8±0.4) d versus (3.2±0.6) d)and postoperative hospital stay ((3.3±0.8) d versus (4.1±1.3) d).Significant differences in these parameters were found between the two groups(P<0.05).Compared with TUPKP group,the blood loss and postoperative bladder irrigation were significantly less in TMLRP group.One month postoperatively,there were 4 cases of urethral stricture in TUPKP group.Three months postoperatively,IPSS,QOL,Qmax and PVR were significantly improved in both groups (P<0.01),but no significant difference detected between the 2 groups (P<0.05).Conclusions TMLRP is superior to TUPKP in term of safety and tolerability (decreased blood loss,complication rate and short recovery time),and as efficacious as TUPKP in efficacy.Compared with TUPKP,operating time were significantly longer in TMLRP group

4.
Chinese Journal of Urology ; (12): 515-517, 2012.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-427324

RESUMO

Objective To evaluate the value of sonourethrography in the diagnosis of dysuria after bipolar transurethral plasmakinetic prostatectomy. Methods Sixty male patients with dysuria after bipolar transurethral plasmakinetic prostatectomy underwent sonourethrography and re-operation.The clinical data of these patients were reviewed. Results The sonourethrographic findings were similar with the operative findings in 57 cases.In the 60 cases,there were 11 cases with bladder neck closure,10 cases with bladder neck stricture,30 cases with urethral stricture (16 located at membranous urethra,12 located at pars cavernosa urethra and 2 in external orifice of urethra),5 cases with prostate remnant,1 case with calculi in prostatic urethra,2 cases with dysfunction of detrusor of bladder and 1 case with flap of internal urethral orifice,Conclusions Sonourethrography could be a reliable diagnostic method for dysuria after bipolar transurethral plasmakinetic prostatectomy.It may be helpful for clinical treatment.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA