Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Dental press j. orthod. (Impr.) ; 27(6): e222154, 2022. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1421348

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this prospective clinical study was to compare the clinical outcomes of three different fixed lingual retainers, in terms of effects on periodontal health and success rate. Methods: Forty five patients aged 13 to 25 years were randomly assigned into three groups, using bonded upper and lower lingual retainers. The study groups were as follows: Group 1- Bond-A-Braid®, Group 2- everStick® ORTHO, Group 3- Super-Splint. The follow-up appointments were performed two weeks (Baseline=T0), one month (T1), three months (T2), and six months (T3) after the application of retainers. Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), Probing Depth (PD), Bleeding in Probing (BOP) and Retainer Failure were assessed at each appointment. Results: The everStick Ortho group showed significantly lower PI values on the upper-lower lingual side after three (p=0.008) and six (p=0.001) months. The everStick Ortho group had significantly lower upper lingual (GI) levels after six months, and lower lingual side levels after one month. The Super-Splint group showed significantly lower PD values on the upper lingual side after six months. The everStick Ortho group presented significantly lower BOP levels after six months on the upper lingual side. No significant differences between the groups (p>0.05) in terms of retainer failure were found. Conclusions: The everStick Ortho group presented better results in terms of periodontal health. The failure rates of the retainers were similar.


RESUMO Objetivo: O objetivo do presente estudo clínico prospectivo foi comparar a taxa de sucesso de três tipos de contenção lingual fixa e seus efeitos clínicos sobre a saúde periodontal. Métodos: Quarenta e cinco pacientes, com idades entre 13 e 25 anos, usando contenções fixas coladas nas arcadas superior e inferior foram agrupados, aleatoriamente, nos três seguintes grupos: Grupo 1 - Bond-A-Braid®; Grupo 2 - everStick® ORTHO; e Grupo 3 - Super-Splint. As consultas de acompanhamento foram feitas após duas semanas (inicial = T0), um mês (T1), três meses (T2) e seis meses (T3) da instalação das contenções. Em todas as consultas, foram avaliados o Índice de Placa (IP), Índice Gengival (IG), Profundidade de Sondagem (PS), Sangramento à sondagem (SAS) e Falha da Contenção. Resultados: O grupo everStick Ortho mostrou valores de IP significativamente menores nas faces linguais dos dentes superiores e inferiores após três (p=0,008) e seis (p=0,001) meses. O grupo everStick Ortho também apresentou níveis significativamente menores de IG na face lingual dos dentes superiores após seis meses, e face lingual dos dentes inferiores após um mês. O grupo Super-Splint mostrou valores significativamente menores de PS na face lingual dos dentes superiores após seis meses. O grupo everStick Ortho apresentou níveis significativamente menores de SAS na face lingual dos dentes superiores após seis meses. Quanto à falha na contenção, não houve diferença significativa (p>0,05) entre os grupos. Conclusões: O grupo everStick Ortho apresentou os melhores resultados em termos de saúde periodontal. As taxas de falha das contenções foram semelhantes.

2.
Korean Journal of Orthodontics ; : 447-453, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-647432

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We compared the shear bond strength (SBS) of lingual retainers bonded to bovine enamel with three different resins using direct and indirect methods. METHODS: Both ends of pre-fabricated twisted ligature wires were bonded to bovine enamel surfaces using Light-Core, Tetric N-Flow, or Transbond XT. Phosphoric acid-etched enamel surfaces were primed with One-Step prior to bonding with Light-Core or Tetric N-Flow. Transbond XT primer was used prior to bonding with Transbond XT. After 24 hours in water at 37degrees C, we performed SBS tests on the samples. We also assigned adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores after debonding and predicted the clinical performance of materials and bonding techniques from Weibull analyses. RESULTS: Direct bonding produced significantly higher SBS values than indirect bonding for all materials. The SBS for Light-Core was significantly higher than that for Tetric N-Flow, and there was no significant difference between the direct bonding SBS of Transbond XT and that of Light-Core. Weibull analysis indicated Light-Core performed better than other indirectly bonded resins. CONCLUSIONS: When the SBS of a wire retainer is of primary concern, direct bonding methods are superior to indirect bonding methods. Light-Core may perform better than Transbond XT or Tetric N-Flow when bonded indirectly.


Assuntos
Adesivos , Resinas Compostas , Esmalte Dentário , Ligadura , Cimentos de Resina , Água
3.
Korean Journal of Orthodontics ; : 295-301, 2005.
Artigo em Coreano | WPRIM | ID: wpr-650957

RESUMO

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of thermocycling on shear bond strength and mode of failure of orthodontic bonded retainer using flowable composite resin and to ascertain whether the flowable composite resin is useful for use as adhesive for orthodontic bonded retainers. One hundred and sixty freshly extracted human premolars were collected and eighty bonded retainer specimens were fabricated. They were randomly separated into 2 groups (Group G: general composite resin-CharmFil(R), Group F: flowable composite resin-CharmFil Flow(R), wire: Tri-flex(R)). Each group was divided into 2 subgroups (Subgroup 24: stored in water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours for baseline data, Subgroup T: stored in water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours and thermocycled between 5 +/- 2 degrees C and 55 +/- 2 degrees C for 500 cycles before testing the in vitro shear bond strength). Shear bond strength was measured and mode of failure was evaluated with a stereomicroscope. There was no statistical difference in shear bond strength and mode of failure between the bonded retainer using general composite resin and flowable composite resin. Therefore, in considering shear bond strength and mode of failure, it is sufficient to use flowable composite resin as resin adhesives for bonded retainers.


Assuntos
Humanos , Adesivos , Dente Pré-Molar , Água
4.
Korean Journal of Orthodontics ; : 143-153, 2002.
Artigo em Coreano | WPRIM | ID: wpr-643987

RESUMO

The bonded orthodontic retainer constructed from composite and multistrand orthodontic wire provides an esthetic and efficient system for maintained retention. This study was designed to measure shear bond strength of bonded retainers and to suggest a optimal combination of a multistrand wire and bonding method used when bonded retainer was fabricated. 160 sound maxillary and mandibular premolars were used for 80 test samples. After Uniformizing bonding area, length of wire, and thickness of composite, multistrand wire was bonded to fabricated a bonded retainer by direct or indirect bonding method. Shear bond strength and extension length of each sample were measured by a universal testing machine. The results of this study were as follows: 1. In vitro shear bond testing found 6-stranded, 0.0155 inch wires to have the largest shear bond strength and 3-stranded, 0.0195 inch wires to have the least shear bond strength. But, These difference was not statistically significant(p<0.05). 2. In vitro extension testing found 3-stranded, 0.0155 inch wires to have the largest extension length and 3-stranded, 0.0195 inch wires to have the least extension length(p<0.05). The larger diameter wire was used, the larger extension length was shown. But, the strand of wire is not related to the extension length of wire. 3. In comparison with direct bonding method, larger shear bond strength and extension length was shown in indirect bonding method(p<0.05).


Assuntos
Dente Pré-Molar , Contenções Ortodônticas , Fios Ortodônticos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA